1 882

The ancient Siberian Semirechye was recently called Serika and Lukomorye, and Great Tartary became the successor of Great Turan, and after the collapse of 1775 it began to be called Siberia. It was precisely Siberia that, according to the historian I. Tashkinov, was the Homeland of the Slavs, whose statehood is as well known as the state formations of the Scythians and Huns, who once dominated the vast expanses of Siberia and it was during the Huns’ invasion of Europe that the appearance of the tribe of Sabirs and Savirs was noted (Serbs).

The Serbs, also known as Serbs, Subirs, Serfs, Issedons, Sindons, etc., had their ancient homeland in the territory of present-day Siberia, which in the Middle Ages was called Serika, in ancient times Prehistoric India, and in the Avesta it was called Hapta-Hindu, then there is Semirechye.

In the book of the modern Russian historian Ivan Tashkinov “Slavs. Northern Source" (Tomsk. 2012), the history of population migrations in Siberia is examined in detail. A hypothesis has been put forward that it was Siberia that was the ancient center of culture and the ethnogenetic cauldron of the peoples of the world.

As Tashkinov, one of the many peoples of ancient Siberia, writes, the Serbs of the North lived in the North in Siberia, in a country of numerous rivers. The part of the Siberian lands where the ancient Serbs lived during the time of Ptolemy, referring to ancient sources, was called Prehistoric India (India Superior), and later, based on the inhabited lands, this territory began to be called Serika (Serbika) and the Serbs (more broadly, the Slavs) are the oldest inhabitants Siberia. Ptolemy (150 AD) and Pliny the Elder wrote about the Serbs, they give a fairly detailed description of Seriki. Serika is a densely populated, vast country. According to Ptolemy, Serica enters India (India Superior) from the west, borders on Asiatic Scythia (Scythi), located beyond the Urals (Imaum), Terra Incognita in the northeast, China (Sinae) or China in the east, and India (southern) on south.

Below is a fragment of a medieval map, according to C. Ptolemy. Here we see India Superior, India Meridion, India Gangptic and also India on the Indochina Peninsula. The India Superior we are interested in is India Upper (Prehistoric, Initial) located in the northeast of Hindustan, in Siberia.

Here are some references to the Serbs in written documents of antiquity and the Middle Ages.

The oldest written mention of the Serbs is in the reports of Herodotus (5th century BC) and Diodorus Siculus. They mention a lake in Lower Egypt called SERBONIS.

Strabo (1st century BC) writes about the Kanthos/Skamanros river, calling it by its original name Sirbis (SIRBIS, SIRBIKA).
Tacitus (50 AD) describes a tribe of Serbs (SERBOI) living in the North Caucasus and Black Sea region.

Pliny (69-75 AD) reports that Maeotians and Serbs live next to the Cimmerians. The Meotians are related peoples with the Sindians (SINDI, SINDON) and Mitannians, and the Siberian Issedons, Sindians, Sindons, i.e. rivermen, known to us now as chaldons, they still live and thrive in the territory of Siberia.

Ptolemy (150 AD) reports that the Serbs live between the mountains and the Ra (Volga) river. We also remember that the Serbs were called Raska.

Procopius (6th century AD) calls the Serbs Sporae (SPOROI) and says that now (6th century AD) they are called Antae and Slavs (Antae, Sclavenes). Procopius says that all the Slavs were called Serbs and disputes - this is very important evidence.

“Your country is called Racea because your ancestors lived scatteredly, that is, sporadic” (Herberstein).
One of the reliable sources on the general history of Serbs and Russians is the “father of history” Herodotus. He says: “The Thracian people, after the Indians, are the most numerous on earth. If the Thracians were only unanimous and under the rule of one ruler, then, I think, they would be invincible and much more powerful than all nations. But since they could never come to unanimity, this was the root of their weakness.”

Herodotus tells us that the country of Rasia is huge, and that the Danube originates in Rasia.

Serbia in the Middle Ages was called by two names, Serbia and Rasia, i.e. Raska. Greeks of races, i.e. Thras (Thracians), were considered Serbs, i.e. Serbs were considered a race.

Greek writers say that Thrasia, i.e. Russia, in ancient times, extended from the Black Sea to the Adriatic. This means that Rasia covered the entire mother Serbian territory. When Herodotus first mentions the Sarbats (Sarmatians), he finds them in Russia, on the Don. Thus, according to Herodotus, the Russians are in Serbia and on the Danube, and the Serbs are in Russia and on the Don.

Herodotus also calls the Tyrrhenian Sea the Sarbian (Sardonian) Sea. This says that the Rasen (Etruscans) were also called Serbs, since we are talking about their sea.

The French historian E. Prico de Saint-Marie calls the Serbs Scordisci, distorted from Sorbians, and says: “The Scordisci tribe during the Romans was so numerous that they owned Illyria, Pannonia, Moesia and Thrace.” Prico then finds the Scordisci in Herzegovina, Montenegro, Bosnia, Old Serbia, Moesia and Macedonia.
Another French historian Di Cange says: “Scordiskorum Thraciae populationes”, which in translation reads: “The Serbs are Russian, i.e. Russian people."

Lorenz Surowiecki, Polish Slavist of the 19th century. His joint work with the Slovak Slavist P. Safarik “On the Origin of the Slavs”, page 66, 1828:

“...the name SERB, as a universal name for all tribes of Vindic (Indian) origin, is older than Slav...”
The Russian Empress Catherine the Great was of Lusatian-Serbian origin, which historians have proven by the title of her father (he was the prince of the Anhalt-Zerbst region (Anhalt-Zerbst) - previously called “Srbishte”, her origin was also written in the Parisian magazine “Figaro” dated 07/08 .1984). In her youth, Catherine was called “Northern Semiramis.” Personally, she said to herself that she was of the Slavic race and wrote to Baron Friedrich Grim in 1784 that the Slavic language was the original language of all people.

In the letter, he calls on all Serbs to fight against the Turks and asks to remember “their glorious and heroic ancestors, first of all the Serbian king Alexander the Great, who defeated many kings and conquered many countries.”

Modern Russian linguist Alexander Dragunkin believes that the initial “s” usually disappears when translated into Western languages: soot - ash, swara - war, deal - deal. Perhaps, in this way, the initial “s” disappeared in the name of the Siberian people and their king Spor (Spor) - pores (Por). Now, as we have already learned, Siberia in the past had the name of India, and our people still have a legend about its king Pore.

Yes, you heard right, Alexander the Great was in Siberia, but more on that in the following articles.

The hypothesis of the “Siberian ancestral home of the Indo-European peoples,” as Tashkinov writes, was first stated and substantiated by N.S. Novgorodov in his books “Tomsk Lukomorye” and “Siberian ancestral home”.

According to this hypothesis, Siberia is prehistoric India (India Superior), from ancient maps you can find the translation as “Upper India”, i.e. original. The territory of Siberia, called Semirechye (Hapta-Hindu) in ancient sources, is Upper, Primordial or Prehistoric India (India Superior), the country of the Issedons (Essedons, Essedons, Sindons).

Hapta-Hindu is the Avestan name for the geographical region in which the Aryan tribes lived before their exodus to Iran and India. Hapta-Hindu is Semirechye, literally from Avestan: “seven rivers.” But if we focus on historical and mythological materials, then we should consider Hapta-Hindu India Prehistoric, First, Primordial or Upper (India Superior).

According to the Vedas and the legends preserved among the people, after the world cataclysm, known to us from the Bible as the global flood, our ancestors fled from flooding in elevated areas. Later, as the water began to recede, they settled in the lands washed by the rivers Iriy (Irtysh), Ob, Yenisei, Angara, Lena, Ishim and Tobol. But Tashkinov notes that according to the Rig-Veda, these West Siberian rivers were: Ob, Irtysh, Tobol, Yenisei, Tom, Chulym, Vakh.

Well, let’s try to restore the ancient names of the Siberian rivers of Semirechye (Hapta-Hindu) according to the Rig Veda:
Hydasp (Chulym) is a tributary of the Indus (Ob) River, which flows parallel to the Akesin (Tom) River, and which is also a tributary of the Indus. According to our constructions we get:

Hydaspes is Chulym (Us), Indus is Ob, and the Akesin (black, dark) river is Tom (dark).

Sarasvati is Irtysh, Artis, Arta Su. From the following constructions: sara = race = arsa - arta su (Irtysh).

If the Yenisei and its mouth are the Ganges, then the Angara is the Ganges. Ancient Indian toponymy was also preserved by such Siberian rivers as the Indigirka - the mountainous Indus and the Indiga.

But here are other data from some scientists about the Indian toponymy of Siberian rivers in ancient times, based on their construction we get: Hydaspus is the Irtysh, the Yenisei is Akesin, the Angara is the Ganges and the Ob is the Indus.

Below are the modern locations of the rivers of Siberia.

Abulkasim Ferdowsi wrote about the Ob as the main river of the Aryans in the immortal poem “Shahnameh”. The city of Visagan is also mentioned there, and we already know Vasyugan as a country of rivers and swamps. It is interesting that the country of Subir in Sumerian was called Su-bir, Subar, Subur or Subartu. In Ugaritic sources (Amarna letters) this country is named as SBR, now known to us as Siberia, the cradle of many peoples and the ancient homeland of the Serbian people.

Thanks to the famous Serbian historian and ethnologist of the 19th century Milos Milojevic and other sources, Serbian folk songs have come down to us, in which India and Siberia are often mentioned.

On the left is an old Serbian folk song - translated into Russian. Collection: Milos S. Milojevic, “Songs and customs of the total Serbian people”, 1869, Book 1. Ritual songs.

In the ancient book of India, Rig-Veda (Treasure of Knowledge), the giant “Srb-inda” is mentioned in the 32nd hymn.

The Siberian Semirechye also had other ancient names - this is the land of the Holy Race and Belovodye, with the main priestly center located in the area of ​​​​present-day Omsk, but in the Rig-Veda and Avesta it is noted only as Hapta-Hindu, i.e. Semirechye.

Strange Elongated Skulls Discovered

Scientists tied the name of the Siberian Semirechye to Punjab (India), but “Panj ob”, translated as “five rivers,” which is not true. Also tied to Central Asia, the area of ​​​​Lake Balkhash, but earlier this region was called “Jetesui” - the country of robbers. Jete - robbers, vagabonds, so called the Mughals because they maintained a nomadic, predatory lifestyle, and “sui” translated: side, direction, area. This was later changed to “Dzhetysu” (seven rivers). And it was done like this, the Siberian Cossacks were resettled to Central Asia by deception, and the territory adjacent to Lake Balkhash began to be called Semirechye, the Siberian Cossacks became sevens, this will be written about later.

In the Avesta, Hapta-Hindu is called the region where the Aryans lived and is characterized by the presence of many great rivers. In the Rig-Veda, the region of great rivers is mentioned in a story describing the feat of Indra when he freed the rivers from damming. The demon Arbuda with the serpent Vritra (VRTRA, see NizhneVartovsk) blocked the flow of large rivers, and trouble came to the lands of the Aryans (flood, waters of Manu). It is said about Indra that he killed the water demon Arbud. Facts such as the disappearance of the sun below the horizon at the beginning of the eighth month in autumn are also described, as a result of which a time of long twilight begins, a dark night lasting a hundred days and a long dawn of thirty days. This forms the basis of the legend associated with the Arctic, and every incident in it can be understood and naturally explained by the Arctic theory. And the damming of rivers by ice, the onset of cold, and the northern lights does not fit in with the territory of Punjab (India) and Central Asia (Balkhash).

The coming cold spell froze the rivers, as a result they were backed up by a dam, and the entire overlying area was flooded, and the habitat of the Slavic-Aryans, Hapta-Hindu (Semirechye), was also flooded. The Aryans were forced to settle in areas with higher elevations of the earth's surface, and some migrated south to warmer climes. It was from this moment that the development of the Mediterranean by our ancestors began, and the surviving inhabitants of Antlan (Atlantis) also settled there. Before the cataclysm, this territory was controlled by the Atlanteans; subsequently, rivalry and a strict demarcation of residence arose between them. In those days, there were still wild tribes of people, like the Neanderthals, and if our ancestors exterminated them, the settlers from Antlan began to interbreed with them, creating new types of race in opposition to their rivals.

Scientists count up to 27 species of ancient representatives of archanthropes. In antediluvian times, when our ancestors settled in the European part of the continent, not occupied by ice, they were forced to conquer these territories from the archanthropes.

In post-flood times, after many migrations from the territories of Siberia, the Issedons, Sindons, Sabirs, Savirs, Serbs, etc., uniting with the descendants of the Kostenov-Streltsy culture, will create Russian civilization. In all its parameters, it is opposed to European, Western civilization. The coordinate scale of Russian civilization is completely different from that of Western civilization. Unfortunately, some of the Western peoples were subject to genetic mixing with archanthropes and they have a different psychotype, hence the rejection of our culture. Western civilization is built on rationalism, the predominance of the material over the spiritual. The belief that force can organize and build the whole world, the post “White Pages of the History of Siberia (Part 2)” was posted about this.
Below are territories liberated from archanthropes.

The Kostenkovites are the same Cro-Magnons; they gave rise to the development of European civilization and writing. On the territory of modern Serbia, the oldest of all settlements in Europe was discovered, it is more than 8000 years old BC, and it was named Lepenski Vir. Scientists talk about it as the source of European civilization.

From Lepenski Vir came the Vinčansky letter, which was fully consistent with the Etruscan and, to a large extent, Phoenician writing, from which the rest of the later types of European and Middle Eastern writing originated.

The “Vinča” civilization was discovered at the beginning of the 20th century in the village of Vinča, near Belgrade on the banks of the Danube. The technology of writing occurs in the Vinca civilization at a time when the development of other parts of the world cannot be measured against Vinca. At that time, there is not a single mention of any urban settlements in Mesopotamia, and the wait for Rome is still more than 3000 years. Many centuries would pass before the organization of the early city-states, and therefore such an early (6500-5500 BC) appearance of the use of writing in the middle reaches of the Danube is surprising and very significant.

Part I. Behind the shadow of myths

The greatness of time is afraid of the pyramids,
everything else melts into the distance,
Only the invisible Autolycus,
draws a trace of history.

The boundaries of centuries are erased,
eras are foggy,
And the myths of ancient books -
as beautiful as gods.

It is tempting to view the distant past through the prism of myths. I ask my opponents not to be too zealous, because the author himself is not confident in his conclusions based on ancient legends.

Prehistoric history has been preserved in literary adaptations by ancient authors and in folk epics.

Myths are myths, and, for example, the ancient work about Troy and the war under its walls turned out to be pure truth in all its details. Thanks to archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann.

We also see it among the Vyatichi Slavs. Prince Gyurgiy and his ally Stoslav came to Moskov. Here, during Lent, a “strong lunch” took place. And then the chronicles became silent about Moscow. But many legends “About the conception of the city of Moscow” have been preserved not from Borovitsky, but from Tagansky, the hill, and long before Yuri Dolgoruky. On this hill, archaeologists have dug up no less than Schliemann at Troy.

As we see, myths can have a very real basis.

Let's enter the magical world of ancient legends and try to discern an era covered in the haze of time.

Myths and Hyperborea

There are many works that report on a mysterious people contemporary with the ancient Greeks. Greek thinkers called that people Hyperboreans, and report that they were in close contact with them, even learned from them. They adopted some things in religion. A whole cult of the god Apollo was compiled, connecting the Greeks with that mysterious people.

The ancients were convinced that the Greek sun god Apollo and his sister, the hunting goddess Artemis, came from distant Hyperborea. Their mother Leto lived here before moving to Greece. Hyperborean women helped Leto deliver her pregnancy and give birth to Artemis and Apollo. For some time, Apollo lived among the Hyperboreans and there he acquired a prophetic gift, although, according to myths, he did not possess this gift from birth.

Herodotus, Diodorus, Democritus, Pliny directly stated that their Greek civilization was “grown” by the Hyperborean, more ancient and highly developed.

In their myths, the Greeks sent Apollo to Hyperborea for wisdom on a silver arrow, and the people were taught by the Hyperboreans Abaris and Aristaeus, the servants of Apollo. Enlighteners had the gift of clairvoyance, endowed people with cultural values, music, philosophy, introduced them to the art of creating poems and hymns, and participated in the construction of the Delphic Temple with the symbolic center of the world, Omphalus.

Let's draw the first conclusions.

Conclusion one.

The Greeks and even the god Apollo constantly learned from someone and adopted knowledge. Against this background, statements like “all the wisdom of Europe from the ancient Greeks” are apparently a strong exaggeration.

Conclusion two.

Hyperborea is described in detail by the Greeks. All their myths speak of a blessed land of happy and wise people.

Conclusion three.

This wonderful country is practically contemporary with the creators of myths.

Scientists and Hyperborea.

Such a mythological heritage gave rise to the desire to find out where this earthly paradise was, if, of course, it existed in reality.

First, complete denial.

As usual, supporters of Hyperborea also had opponents.

The idea has been expressed that for several centuries swindlers in the person of the Druids instilled in the Greeks a myth about a country that did not exist in reality. However, this version does not explain the emergence of myths about an unknown northern country in ancient Indian and Persian epics (in Indian legends - Mahabharata, Rigveda, Purana, in Persian - Avesta, etc.). Similar myths are known among the modern peoples of the north of Russia. And paleoclimatologists have obtained interesting information. The results of well analyzes showed that in the period from 130 to 70 thousand years ago there was a warm climate in the north.

The real possibility of the existence of an unknown northern civilization is beginning to emerge. But based on the dating of the fertile climate, this supposed culture is clearly not contemporary with the ancient Greeks.

World ocean level. Chronology.

Mythological dictionaries call Hyperborea and its people mythical. The famous Mercator map adds mystery. The publication of the map dates back to the 16th century, but it is unclear when the topographic survey was carried out. For many thousands of years, the state of the Arctic Ocean has been significantly different from the map.

Over the past 500 thousand years, four great glaciations have occurred on earth. Even 30 thousand years ago, the thickness of the glacier at the latitude of Kyiv reached two kilometers, like today in Antarctica. In Europe, this last glacier began to melt about 18 thousand years ago.

Geochronologists have compiled a graph of possible changes in the level of the World Ocean. About 30 thousand years ago, thanks to the glaciation of the planet, the level of the World Ocean dropped by 100 meters! Subsequently, it slowly increased and about 15 thousand years ago it immediately rose by 20 meters. Finally, about 7 thousand years ago, the sea level rose abruptly by another 6 meters and remains approximately at this level to this day.

All changes in the level of the World Ocean are associated with ecological and climatic disasters, which are described in the myths and tales of the peoples of the world.

As we see, the legendary global flood took place in history, which means it could actually flood Mercator’s Hyperborea. According to the established dates, the period of the warm climate of the north and the beginning of the last glaciation are quite consistent. It remains a mystery when the authors of this knowledgeable map lived.

Two versions suggest themselves. First, information about the Hyperboreans came to the ancient Greeks in the form of myths of other peoples. The same thing happened in Asia. Someone brought their epic and over time it acquired a local flavor. Version two - if we agree that Hyperborea really existed, then we should look for it not in the north.

Where did the silver arrow take Apollo?

The earliest dating option for the Temple of Apollo at Delphi is the 2nd millennium BC. But at this time, in the north, the fertile islands had long since sunk, and the climate had changed. All that remains are modern rocky islands and a permafrost-covered mainland coastline. It’s unlikely that it occurred to Apollo to fly on ice, and what’s the point in that - everything interesting is already at the bottom. What then served as the basis for the myths, was it just the eternal dream of milk rivers with jelly banks?

Traces are real and myths.

Based on a generalization of ethnographic and historical material, Ph.D. S.V. Zharnikova localized the ancestral home of the Indo-Aryan peoples between the White Sea and the Northern Ridges, and from the east and west, the Ural Mountains and the Scandinavian Peninsula.

St. Petersburg scientists visited the uninhabited islands of the White Sea and discovered sanctuaries and pyramids. Whose? Who is the builder?

After the end of the Great Patriotic War, secret harbors of German submarines located in stone grottoes were discovered along the northern sea route. The Germans used ready-made grottoes. Conducting construction work secretly with the resources of that time was unrealistic. Who are the grotto builders? Another mystery.

In 2000, a megalithic sanctuary dedicated to the Sun God was found on the highest plateau of Khibiny. Members of the expedition claim that the central element of the sanctuary is exactly like the Omphalos in the Temple of Apollo at Delphi. Russian researchers called the find the “Kola Omphalus.”

It was here, according to supporters of northern Hyperborea, that a people was formed that became the progenitor of many nations. Those who reached the Sayan and Altai laid the foundation for the Turkic peoples; who remained on the territory of Eastern Europe became the basis of the Indo-European peoples, including the Slavs. Indirect confirmation of this is the myths of the Indo-Iranians, which tell about fair-faced sages who came from behind the northern mountains, and even the complete coincidence of the DNA of modern Russians with the DNA of 100 million Indian men. The Indians and I have the same ancestor, the same one who lived 5000±200 years ago on the Russian plain and in the steppes of southern Russia.

The exploration of the Russian north is just getting underway.

Despite the scant information from historians looking for Hyperborea in the Arctic, the ancient world had extensive ideas about the life of the Hyperboreans.

Pythia - who are they?

And here are the myths about direct contacts of the Greeks with the Hyperboreans.

A number of legends are associated with the Hyperboreans bringing crops to the island of Delos to Apollo. After the girls sent with gifts did not return home, the Hyperboreans began to leave gifts on the border of Greece (Plin. Nat. hist. IV 26; Herodot. IV 32 - 34). By the way, such arbitrariness over someone else’s freedom is not the first that happened in Delphi. Apollo himself appointed the first priests of his temple. The servants were Cretan sailors sailing past the island of Delos.

Now let's take a closer look at the legends.

The Greeks endowed the Hyperboreans with the gift of clairvoyance. Surviving Slavic sources say that their priests also possessed this gift.

Based on what has been said and taking into account that all this happens after the global flood, when Hyperborea is no longer in the north, we have the right to see the Slavs as farmers bringing gifts to the Greeks. The historian Rybakov and the geneticist Klyosov noticed these workers in Europe already 5 thousand years ago. Various Greek sources describe Scythian farmers living in the Black Sea and North Caucasus steppes. Interesting Scythians. Some call them nomads, and then others call them sedentary farmers, who very much resemble the Slavs. The Greeks did not think much about identifying their barbarian neighbors.

Here is the answer to who they were and where the girls with the gifts went. Stolen Hyperboreans, i.e. Slavic women were forced to serve as Pythia in the Delphic temple of Apollo for predictions, or they tried to get from them children with the hereditary gift of divination.

And on the Internet there is one broken record: “low-class Greek women were Pythia”! We read myths. The first Pythia were virgins. After seducing the young priestess, local old women began to be appointed Pythia.

Greek women predicted only in a state of drug intoxication from the gas escaping from the cleft of the mountain in the temple of Apollo. And the Hyperborean girls apparently could predict without the drug, and that’s why they paid with freedom.

Before being assigned to work in the temple of Apollo, local women were required to undergo a casting for professional suitability. Not every applicant had the necessary data for divination. These details are reported by Plutarch, who himself was for some time a minister of the temple at Delphi.

The clairvoyant gas in the Temple of Apollo on the island of Delos was recently examined by American scientists. The result was published in the journal Geology. It is a mixture of hydrocarbon gases with a significant proportion of ethylene. Inhaling such a mixture, any person falls into a trance and utters all sorts of words. Delphic gases have the most powerful narcotic effect on women. Now it’s clear why ladies were chosen to divine.

Delphic phenomenon.

The Pythia was predicted to be 1400 years old. For charlatanism without exposure, something is too much. The last of the prophecies was given by the Delphic oracle in 392 AD - “accepted Christianity will destroy the Roman Empire.” The collapse of the empire, as is known, began in 395, i.e. three years after the prophecy.

Modern scientists have developed a different version of the Delphic Oracle phenomenon from the generally accepted point of view (CHP). Researchers believe that our planet is surrounded by an energy information field, which contains everything that was and everything that will be. Modern philosophers explain this in a simple passage. Information is located in an environment where there is no concept of time. Information simply exists, and it does not require time to exist. Information about the future is stored next to the past and present. It's all about how to connect to this wealth.

Now we know contemporaries who have received the gift of clairvoyance from nature. They talked about current events, the past and predicted the future. This is Wolf Messing, Vanga, Dzhuna Davitashvili. Yes, you yourself can name many similar names. No mysticism or fantasy. Of course, among psychics there are also falsifiers, it’s too rich a place. But there are also those who are not exposed, but on the contrary are asked to help, even state security forces, for example, during counter-terrorism operations.

The information shell of the Earth is huge. By connecting to such a field, an unprepared person will be in mortal danger. And indeed the Pythia did not have a long life, apparently not only because of the inhalation of narcotic gases. But scientists are convinced that with proper preparation, anyone could “connect” to this information field without drugs and without risking their lives, as, for example, the Slavic priests did. We should not forget that history knows examples when ancient technologies were used in the 20th century after their secondary discovery.

Pythagoras: name and studies.

Here is another fulfilled prophecy of the Oracle at Delphi.

There is a well-known poetic Slavic legend about how the Slavic Pythia of the Temple of Apollo, breaking a celibacy dinner, gave birth to a boy who later took the name Pythagoras.

The birth of Pythagoras was predicted by the Delphic oracle. In the prophecy Pythagoras is called " great son of the sun god Apollo" A very piquant prophecy confirming the Slavic legend.

There is a legend according to which Pythagoras himself took a name for himself, showing who he considered to be his parents. Pythia and the Egyptian sun god Horus. What does the Egyptian god have to do with it? Well, firstly, Horus is the same god of the Sun and in him Pythagoras saw his god of the Sun - Apollo. And, secondly, Pythagoras studied in Egypt, where, apparently, he made a name for himself. Pythagoras studied for more than 40 years in different countries of Asia and Africa.

What knowledge Greece gained in the person of Pythagoras beyond its borders cannot be counted, among them the Vedas and clairvoyance, the cultures of the Chaldeans and Persian magicians, the highest Brahmic and yogic initiation in India.

Returning home, Pythagoras founded his own theological school. A whole movement of his followers in Greek culture is known - the Pythagoreans.

The first census of the Slavs.

Let us return to the gifts brought to Greece by the Hyperborean maidens. I wonder where those gifts came from and in what ways.

An amazing northern civilization has been at the bottom of the ocean for many millennia, and supposedly its people walk around Europe with gifts. Who are these people who have preserved information about the ancient and mighty; surviving descendants or their students? Among the known religions, only one Vedas calls an entire people relatives of the gods - these are the Slavs. They are the grandchildren of DazhdBog.

The Slavs appear in the arena of history “unexpectedly” for historians, at the same time on a vast territory, having one language and one religious culture. That culture that contains echoes of the ancient knowledge of the Hyperboreans. Linguists, and now geneticists, also see the settlement of the Proto-Slavs in the vastness of Eurasia.

History does not know any mass migrations of people from south to north at the beginning of the second millennium AD, not a single chronicle about that. Only from the middle of the 12th century did roads begin to be created between Kiev and Suzdal. And before that? Only Apollo flew on his arrow along the route Delphi - North Pole - Delphi.

Or maybe his route was different? In fact, it was not from the Arctic Ocean that the Hyperboreans Abaris and Aristaeus came to Greece, and it was not among the ice hummocks that future gifts for the Greeks matured.

Here is another conclusion.

Since the ancient peoples, including the Greeks, saw Hyperborea, and in the vastness of the Arctic there has been nothing but ice for tens of thousands of years, it means that we were not looking for a fertile country there.

Key to Hyperborea.

According to historian V. Rybnikov, the ancient Greeks, speaking about Hyperborea, looked at the eastern coast of the Black Sea. The Argonauts sailed there, enduring many hardships. Apparently it was worth it.

Rybnikov’s Black Sea version features what is missing in the Arctic. What are we talking about? About the name of the country itself Hyperborea.

In mythological dictionaries Boreas - god of the north wind, the Greeks placed his home in Thrace in the coastal area of ​​Salmidess. Today this is the Black Sea coast of the states of Bulgaria and Ukraine, which arose on ancient Slavic lands. This is where and who brought gifts to the Greeks for Apollo. But here it is - the hyper-power of familiar cliches. The Russian Arctic has nothing to do with it. If there was something once in the vastness of the North, it was certainly not Hyperborea.

But here he is the key to the gates of a mysterious country. Word Boreas, which in the northern version is found only among the Greeks, but unexpectedly resonates on the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus. Residents of the Krasnodar Territory call the strong northwest wind boron.

While sailing to the east of the Black Sea, Hellas sailors also encountered storms with strong winds. Strong Boreas is in Greek and will be Hyperborea. Reaching the coast of the Caucasus, they entered the country behind this wind. So we sailed to the shores of the fertile country of Hyperborea.

Based on these coordinates, Rybnikov found both the place and the rock to which Prometheus was chained for disobeying Zeus. This rock was very accurately described by Aeschylus in his poem “Prometheus Chained”. The rock stands in the vicinity of Gelendzhik near the village of Praskoveevka. Locals call this rock Parus. Truly a legendary place. Nearby is the sunken (sunk again) ancient city of Dioscuria.

The first teacher of the Aryans is Prometheus.

And here’s one from the myths: Someone named Deucalion was saved from the global flood. The father of this Deucalion was none other than Prometheus himself! The Caucasus was known to the Greeks very well. Ancient writers left many stories about the Caucasus.

In the famous Journey of the Argonauts, certain “Apian Arcadians” are mentioned. Api is the name of the earth goddess among the Scythians who lived in the Black Sea and North Caucasus steppes.

Geology says that at the end of the 4th millennium BC. As a result of a huge catastrophe, the land sank in the area of ​​the Sea of ​​Marmara and the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits. Streams poured into the Black Sea, raising the sea level by 50 meters. Crimea as a peninsula, and in addition the Sea of ​​Azov, was formed precisely when the world ocean broke through into the Black Sea through the Dardanelles. Only those who found themselves near the Caucasus Mountains could be saved. For the sufferers, this was truly a fertile land.

Geology gives us a time marker for the origin of the myths about Prometheus, and at the same time the myth about the Sumerian Gilgamesh and his Great Flood, which turns out to be older than the biblical one by as much as 700 years.

This Dardanelles flood suggests looking for the site of the death of Atlantis in the Black Sea. In addition, the historical Ants and mythical Atlanteans lived in these places. But the inhabitants of the Canary Islands and other places do not remember the Atlanteans. By the way, even in times close to us, the tallest knights of Western Europe barely grew to 165 cm. Against this background, the tall Slavs look like Atlanteans. No wonder the monk Sergius of Radonezh, a former warrior, bore the worldly nickname Oslyabya (Pole).

Ancient university.

The Scythian farmers mentioned earlier, that is, the Slavs, lived at one time in the North Caucasian steppes. Here their priests could learn from Prometheus or his students. What would prevent this? And when the Greeks became aware of that formation, they set off here to the Fertile Land: Apollo on an arrow and the Argonauts on a ship. There were more and more people willing to study, so Prometheus sent his best students from among the Hyperboreans, i.e. Slavs, teach the Greeks.

As Aeschylus writes: “Prometheus, contrary to the prohibition of the Gods, gave people fire, discovered the secret of the movement of the stars, taught the art of adding letters, agriculture and sailing.”

In the Caucasus, the Greeks founded their colonies, and the Scythian farmers brought gifts, or rather traded with the Greek colony in Dioscuria and Torik - modern Gelendzhik. And there is nothing surprising or mythical about this. The Slavs traded with Greece in reality, but what did they trade? Bread since time immemorial. Herodotus also wrote in his “History”: “ Hyperboreans are dedicated farmers who sow grain not for their own food, but for sale" According to Herodotus, this happened 3 thousand years ago. In those days, neither the Scythians nor the Finno-Ugric were engaged in agriculture, especially for export. It was our Slavic ancestors who were noted in history, this time by the Greeks.

Myths are myths, but somehow everything begins to look simpler if Hyperborea is placed on the shores of the Black Sea and the northern Caucasus, on the lands where the Slavs lived.

Writing of Prometheus' disciples.

This is an epitaph on the ancient mausoleum near Fort Shevchenko on the Mangyshlak Peninsula. Next, I will simply quote the words of researcher V. Rybnikov:

“The inscription has 16 letters. 10 of them are prototypes of letters of the Brahmi alphabet, 4 letters are Proto-Slavic and 2 are prototypes of Phoenician letters corresponding to modern Russian T and K. The entire inscription dates back over 3000 years.

Translation: Rise up, mother, come to embrace you, dear soul.

The inscription is Indo-European, Aryan, from the time of the birth of the Proto-Slavic language; Slavs are direct descendants of the Aryans; The arias in those days already had their own alphabet, which should be called Eurasian. From the Eurasian alphabet as a basis came the Brahmi, Phoenician, eastern variety of ancient Greek, Pelasgian runic, ancient Greek and Latin alphabets.”

As you can see, many students came to Prometheus University. And what? The descendants of the Aryans, the Slavs, could not inherit the alphabet of their ancestors, but the entire enlightened world could? Again we see in our historiography an all-powerful hyper-cliché.

Another conclusion.

All Greek myths about Hyperborea speak of a blessed land of happy and wise people. The epics of India, Persia and the northern peoples of Russia tell about serious military actions that led to climatic and geological disasters. It seems that the wise and happy should not fight. Especially with such consequences. There is reason to assume that we are dealing with two groups of myths telling about different civilizations.

Probably, in more ancient times, there was another Blessed Country of the Gods with a name other than Hyperborea, and possibly in the warm Arctic with low sea levels. And what happened then and then?

Let's imagine a little.

Prometheus is not a Hyperborean, but rather an Atlantean or even a descendant of the Titans.

On the Danube, in the steppes of Crimea and the foothills of the Caucasus, beyond the habitats of the Boreas wind, live the Slavs, called by the Greeks - Hyperboreans. In the biography of the god Apollo, we see the father Zeus and his mother the Titanide Leto. The role of midwives at the birth of Apollo was performed by Hyperborean women.

Zeus, while performing global work, did not stoop to the process of giving birth to his son, however, Zeus did not shy away from either the Titans or the descendants of the Titans. One way or another, they all found their place on Olympus. But the relationship with the willful Prometheus did not work out. For the sake of personal power over people, he did not keep the great knowledge of his civilization secret. Maybe Mercator’s map is right, and the gods really lived in the north. And well-known northern myths reflect the actual struggle of the titans Chronos with the ambitions of Zeus for power on Earth. Ancient civilizations crossed their terrible weapons, which led to glaciation and subsequent floods. Such a jackpot left no room for concern for the fate of people and the planet.

Seek the truth.

"Enlightenment drives out prejudice." American Henry Ford gave this advice to everyone who wants to know the world. We are surrounded by a sea of ​​information, and for this purpose God gave people reason to distinguish between misconceptions and outright lies from grains of truth.

Our problem is that we read little literature. Some have never even heard of the teachers Abaris and Aristaeus from Hyperborea, the teachers who taught the ancient Greeks “themselves.”

The Aryans, including the Slavs, Greeks, and the Greek god Apollo, studied together with the titan of thought, Prometheus. Then why should we believe that Cyril and Methodius are the first teachers of the descendants of the Aryans?

I personally am offended by such a historical twist, what about you?

Part II. The last sail of Hyperborea

Rock "Sail"

The "Sail" rock in the vicinity of Gelendzhik (Praskoveevka village) looks like a petrified yacht with a raised sail. There is a hole at the bottom of the rock. Local ethnographers say that the hole was made by a mountain artillery shell during the Caucasian War.

According to ancient myths, Prometheus was crucified on this rock, and continuing to persist in his love for people, he was cast down by the lightning of Zeus into the bowels of Tartarus. You cannot find another rock like this in the whole world.

The last sail of Hyperborea stands at the shore, and there is no longer a captain or crew, and there is no one to give the order: “Stay in place, weigh anchor.”

Having fulfilled the mission of the gods,
The entire fleet of Hyperborea has left,
Filling the power of the sails
Breath of Boreas.

Only one yacht at the pier
I fell asleep in an eternal sleep,
The captain is not with her
He was moved to Nav.

But the grandchildren kept it
gifts from the gods:
Fire - great knowledge,
and written syllables.
farming culture,
and the strength of the sails,
Great Slavism
for future centuries!

Be careful, dolmens!

Today, Caucasian dolmens are called places of cult burials, but they came to bury here much later than the creation of the structures themselves. The objects are made of flint sandstone. Their age is determined to be about 5 thousand years. If it is true that time is afraid of pyramids, then it avoids dolmens even more so. After all, information lives outside of time.

A radio broadcast engineer associates ancient buildings with the antenna of a radio transmitter and receiver. Compare the images of a dolmen and a modern antenna.

Silicon dolmen structures are replicated in modern computers. Before us is no more, no less than a communication center with... itself, i.e. with the World Database.

It is very interesting that half of the known dolmens in the western Caucasus are oriented to the south. And this is exactly how the instructions suggest to orient a modern NTV+ antenna.

There is a well-known legend that the Omphalus of the temple at Delphi was the tomb of the sacred Delphic Serpent Python. Originally it was a tombstone and a point of contact between the two worlds of the living and the dead. The Greeks considered Omphale the center of the universe.

Or take a look at the antennas of the motor ship "Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov" - one of the USSR science ships. The ship was designed to study the upper layers of the atmosphere and outer space.

The openings of some dolmens are oriented towards the mountain slopes. This situation baffles historians, but not broadcast engineers. In communications technology, the concept of “passive repeater” is known. And these dolmens are a dime a dozen in the area. Here are radio relay lines built thousands of years ago.

No serious comprehensive studies have been carried out here, but it seems that a version with communication devices is really beginning to emerge.

However, in recent years a serious problem has arisen. This is an invasion of tourists climbing dolmens and leaving mountains of garbage. This is a real disaster. Soon there will be nothing left to explore at all. For example, dolmens previously discovered in Crimea were simply destroyed.

Dolmens are found all over the world and always in coastal countries. Sea space is an ideal condition for the propagation of electromagnetic waves. It’s just not yet clear what waves the dolmens propagate; it seems that these waves are not entirely from the radio range.

It is no coincidence that the Caucasus is associated with the name of Prometheus. Dolmens are amazing. Here, in ancient times, someone communicated with someone. Later, it was here that Prometheus communicated with his own kind, and here he taught those who wanted to touch world knowledge. The Slavic Magi apparently succeeded, since they mastered the gift of divination. It is possible that from here they contacted the Druids, and Shambhala, and... of course, with the world database.

What hidden information. And we are told that those people did not have an alphabet. Stand in front of the dolmen and try This repeat it out loud, and I won’t envy you.

Are dolmens silent?

And here is another antenna. Photo of Omphales in the Delphic Archaeological Museum.

Or on the antennas of the motor ship "Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov" - one of the USSR science ships, which was intended to study the upper layers of the atmosphere and outer space

Staying in front of the dolmen hole for a long time can cause great harm to an uninitiated person. Attention! The danger is real! Who knows whether the last user managed to turn off this device or not. Or maybe the device is still working. Today no one will talk about it.

And this option is also possible. Ancient builders repeated in their buildings the external forms of certain devices, the work of which they had seen with their own eyes. Devices that collect information like nectar in hives and provide honey with answers to asked questions.

Psychics note the increased energy of these places. It seems that the dolmens are still working.

The last conclusion.

Here it is. Myths are myths, but we were able to consider a very specific story.

The ancient Greeks were surrounded by many contemporary peoples. Everyone wrote down their stories, some on stone, some on clay tablets, and some, like the Slavs, on wooden tablets. Time passed, and we were left with many records, but not Slavic ones. Their book tablets disappear into the darkness of centuries along with the Magi, and with them Slavic history disappears. All that remains is the epic memory of the people, based on real events.

The history of Caucasian Hyperborea also disappeared. Only myths have survived. The gods did not write chronicles. Their history is recorded in a global database. Maybe someone will be lucky enough to look there.

Of course, all these thoughts are just a hypothesis, and the search for Hyperborea is not completed.

In any case, we should not forget the Chinese wisdom: “He who listens to one bell hears one sound.”

P.S. About the writing of the Slavs.

As for Slavic writing, I simply suggest that you unbiasedly familiarize yourself with the work of V. Chudinov, Decoding the Slavic syllabic and alphabetic writing. This work examines the origins of the claim about the absence of pre-Cyrillic Slavic writing. Chudinov also names the author of the hyperstamp, who bewitched the entire historical and near-historical community. http://chudinov.ru/parallelnyiy-mir...govogo-pisma/6/

Here is just a small excerpt from Chudinov’s work.

“The authoritative, but fundamentally incorrect view of Vatroslav Yagich* became the starting point for further study of Slavic writing. We still live with him now. Already in the 20th century, the famous Slavist Lubomir Niederle wrote: “it is generally implausible that the Slavic people knew the original written language and used it before the adoption of Christianity.” The fear of fakes and exposure to actual fakes deprived the Slavs of their true cultural history. No more and no less!

All repeats. Including love for authoritative hyperstamps. Suffice it to recall the pearls of the French Academy of Sciences, which did not recognize the fall of meteorites and the existence of Siberian permafrost. The Catholic Church opposed the daily rotation of the Earth no less authoritatively. “But still she spins.” Just as pre-Christian Aryan Slavic writing existed among the descendants of Hyperborea.

*IN. Yagich, outstanding Austrian and Russian philologist-Slavist, linguist, paleographer and archaeographer, 1838-1923.

Literature:

1. M. Agbunov, Ancient myths and legends, Mythological Dictionary, Moscow, Mikis, 1993.

2. A. Platov, Megaliths of the Russian Plain, Moscow, Veche, 2009.

3. F. Kapitsa, Secrets of the Slavic gods, Ripol classic, 2008.

4. V. Rybnikov, Vedic culture of Rus', Golden Section, Penza, 2008.
Internet version:

5. Slavic Vedas, trans. from Bulgarian by A. Asova, M., 2003

6. Poem by the Slavic poet Slavomysl “Song about the slaughter of the Jewish Khazaria by Svetoslav Khorobre”, A.S. Ivanchenko, Magazine "Slavs", N 1, 1991

7. K. Penzev, Princes of Ros: Aryan Blood, Moscow, Algorithm, 2007.

8. A. Zhuravlev, Who are we Russians. Rostov-on-Don, Phoenix, 2007.

9. V.F. Gusev, magazine “Light, Nature and Man”, No. 3, 1997, p. 29.
Internet version, http://oum.ru/index.php?option=com_...view&id=979

10. Morkovin “Dolmens of the Western Caucasus”, M. 1978

Internet sources:

1. Russian north. Hyperborea, http://www.neizvestniy-geniy.ru/news/1052.html

2. The significance of the heritage of the ancient Slavs. The first part of the book by A.V. Trekhlebov “The Blasphemy of Finist - the Clear Falcon of Russia.”

Poems - Alexander Shikalenkov.

Alexander Shikalenkov

We are the sons of great Rus', which was created from the north.

Veles's book

Our throat will let go of silence, Our weakness will melt like a shadow,

And the reward for the nights of despair will be the Eternal Polar Day...

V.S. Vysotsky

Ancient written sources have brought down to our times information about an amazing country - Daariya, which was located at the North Pole and was the ancestral home of the ancient Slavic-Aryans.

Zoroastrian-Mazdean legends say that “many, many millennia ago, near the North Sea, where the Arctic belt is now located, there was a different climate, similar to the climate of southern European countries - Greece, Italy and Lebanon.” The Avesta, an Iranian monument of Zoroastrianism, tells of the "beginning of the world" where the sun, Khvar, never sets, where "... the day is that which is the year," and mentions Mount High Khara, which stretches "throughout the whole earth from West to East" (now this ridge is located at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean).

This wonderful country was located, as stated by the Indian scientist Balgangadhar Tilak (1856-1920) in his book “The Arctic Homeland in the Vedas” (1903) and the Russian biologist E. Elachich (“The Far North as the Cradle of Humankind.” St. Petersburg, 1910), in Arctic, and it was the ancestral home of the Slavic-Aryans.

Another collection of ancient legends, the Indian epic “Mahabharata,” speaks of the high Mount Meru, which was located on the northern edge of the world: “Here, a year is a day, divided in half into day and night. Above the mountain hangs motionless Dhruva (the North Star), around which the stars move: the Seven Rishas (Ursa Major), Arundhati (Cassiopeia) and others.” In India, as you know, these constellations are not visible; they can only be observed in northern latitudes.

Many peoples of the world adopted the legend of a flying serpent-dragon stealing the sun from the ancient Slavic-Aryans. The ancient Vedas tell how “the evil Vritra, or Vala, who stole the sun and hid it in underground strongholds, assigned terrible snakes to guard this sun.” And when the sun goes below the horizon and does not rise again - it was Vala who stole it and hid it - then the long polar night begins. It is at this time that a huge sparkling, constantly writhing serpent appears in the sky above the North Pole - the northern lights. This unusual phenomenon can be observed, as is generally known, only in the northern, that is, Slavic-Aryan lands. The famous Norwegian explorer of the Far North, Nansen (1861-1930), describes it as follows: “... the radiance twisted like a fiery serpent across the entire sky, with its tail ending only 10 degrees above the horizon in the north. From here the radiance turned to the east, scattering itself in several wide stripes, suddenly changing direction and bent into an arc. And again a turn: the radiance turned to the west where it exactly curled up into a ball, from which it was again scattered in several branches throughout the sky.”

We find information about “brilliant water-waters born of a rainbow” - the northern lights, about a fertile climate, about the absence of cold and hot winds, about forests and fields rich in fruits and herds of antelopes on these beautiful lands. This country occupied the White Island - Shvetadvipa, which was located in the northern part of the Sea of ​​Milk (the waters of the Arctic, as is known, have a characteristic milky white color). The island was visible from Mount Meru: “there lived fragrant... white men, removed from all evil..., indifferent to honor and dishonor, marvelous in appearance, full of vitality; ...They lovingly served God, who spread out the Universe... These people were distinguished by the greatest justice and lived much longer than all other mortals - a whole thousand years. They ate only fruits, but could maintain vitality without eating any food at all.”

The book of Manu, the Progenitor of people, says that the country of origin of humanity, Narabgu, bore the original name Aryavarta, or the Land of Good.

In the Avesta, God warns the Aryan leader Imma (Manu) about the death of this paradise: “Imma, noble son of Vivanghata! Disastrous winters will descend on the earth, they will bring snow 14 fingers deep even on the highest mountain peaks. And all three kinds of animals will perish: both those that live in the high mountains and those that live in the deep valleys. Therefore, make Vara with four corners and a large length on each side. And gather everyone there: sheep, cows, birds, dogs, and red flaming fire.”

Imma do just that. He built a large Vara, gathered people, animals and plant seeds there.

A similar description of the death of the original fertile ancestral home of the Slavic-Aryans is found in the Vedas. They say that the leader of the people, Manu, received a warning from God, who took the form of a huge Fish: “The waters will surge, flood the whole earth, destroy all living things, and from this I want to save you.” Heeding the warning, Manu builds a ship and collects all living things in it. The flood comes, the ship rises and floats. The fish draws him to the peak of a mountain protruding from under the water, near which the ship stops; here Manu waits for the waters to recede and the flood to end.

Yu.P. Mirolyubov (1892-1970) conveys “The Tale of Grandmother Varvara”: “When the Land of Oiraz perished in fire and water, snow and ice, Tsar Svarog with the 12 Tsars Svarozhich saved everyone who listened. The disobedient ones all died. The Oirazy sailed into a storm on the sea and sailed, as Tsar Svarog showed with his Trident, all at noon and at noon. They took with them only a few cows, horses and sheep, and poultry - chickens, geese, ducks. They sailed for a day or two until they found the mountains and the Green Land. And when they set sail, already in the morning I saw fog and clouds in the place where the Oiraz Land was. Birds flew above that fog and clouds. The Oyraz sailed to solid ground, and Tsar Svarog turned back, wanting to save whoever he could. However, when they sailed to the place where the Oiraz Land used to be, they found nothing. Only corpses, boards, and various trunks were still floating in the water. Oirazy cried and turned back.

Tsar Svarog appointed Tsar Ventyr over our Ancestors, and he himself with 12 younger kings sailed even further at noon to look for the Egyptian Land. He returned soon, but did not find Egypt. Tsar Svarog began to organize the Earth, resettle people, raise cows. Forbade me to eat meat for 3 years. Said again at noon to look for Egypt. That time I found it and taught people for 30 years how to sow wheat, how to plow, how to forge chablis. Meanwhile, the Rus settled down on Novaya Zemlya. Thirty Kings - Family members were above them. The elder Tsar Ventyr was in charge over them." Mirolyubov also noted that “The Land of Araz was in the north, and it was surrounded on all sides by the sea. This is what both Kobzar Oleksa and Prabka Varvara said. The mountains surrounding the Araz Land still remained in the form of islands: Novaya Zemlya, Franz Joseph Land... The Arazians had measures: they measured the Earth by the evening and morning shadows.”

Unfavorable conditions associated with a sharp deterioration in climate, rising ocean levels (“The Flood”) and tectonic movements accompanied by volcanic activity forced the Slavic-Aryans to leave the Arctic and move to more southern places. The Slavic-Aryan Vedas (“Vedas of Perun”) say that our ancestors “emerged from the sacred country of Daaria and moved along the Stone Belt (Ural Mountains) between the Eastern and Western seas to Russenia.”

The Mahabharata also tells about the migration of the Slavic-Aryans from Arctida to Kashmir (Kasmir) into the thick of the Light Mountains (“porridge”, common slav. - density; “kasa”, Sanskrit - light; “peace”, Sanskrit - mountain). : “The ancestor Brahma brought the Indians from the light of Mount Meru and, leading them through the waters of the Caspian Sea, left them in Kashmir to bear their burden, while he hid the Brahmans (clerics) in the sacred monastery of the ancient Rishis (teachers of mankind), located in the Himalayan mountains.” The very name of the Himalayas, translated from Sanskrit as “winter rookery”, comes from the ancient Russian words “winter lagi” - winter lies. The country occupying these mountains is called Nepal, that is, not scorched, not hot, in contrast to the arc of the Slavic-Aryan country, which also bears the Russian name Palestan, that is, scorched, hot camp. Hence the modern name - Palestine.

The northern country is also mentioned in the myths of Ancient Greece. Outlining the legend, Plutarch (1st century AD) writes that once upon a time, in time immemorial, the peace of the “golden age” was disturbed by the struggle for power between Zeus and his father Cronus, who was supported by the Titans. After the victory of Zeus, the titans, led by Cronus, went somewhere to the north and settled beyond the Kronian Sea on a large flowering island, where “the softness of the air was amazing.” Peace, culture, and art reigned in this country. The priests were engaged in natural science, studying books and writing, and philosophy. One of Plutarch’s heroes, who visited this country, received “as much knowledge in astronomy as a person who has studied geometry can achieve.”

Other myths of the ancient Greeks also tell about the distant northern country located “beyond Scythia”. The Scythians, in turn, talked about the northern lands, where “there lies a country that gives birth to abundant fruits, and in its groves live enlightened and happy people.” However, Herodotus (5th century BC) wrote that the poets Homer (c. 2nd millennium BC) and Hesiod (VIII-VII centuries BC) were the first to tell the world about the “happy northern people - Hyperboreans,” who lived behind the Riphean (Ural) mountains in the domains of the god of the north wind Boreas, that is, in the Far (hyper) north (Boreas). “They improve in justice, not eating meat, but eating the fruits of trees”” (Hellanicus); “They live on the edge of the earth under the protection of Apollo, not knowing war” (Greek poet Ferenik). And here are lines from Pindar’s ode about the happy life of this people, making glorious sacrifices to the Almighty: “There are endless holidays, hymns are heard that delight the heart of Apollo, and he laughs... The cult of the muses is not alien to the Hyperboreans, choirs of young girls gather from everywhere for... sweet sounds flutes, and, crowned with a golden laurel, they indulge in the joy of the holidays. This bright tribe knows neither illness nor the weakness of age. They live far from hard work and battles...”

In the poem "Arimaspeia" Aristius (7th century BC) described an attempt to reach the country of the Hyperboreans. Following this poetic work, Herodotus clarifies that “above the Issedons live one-eyed men - Arimaspes. Above them live the vultures guarding the gold, and above these live the Hyperboreans, reaching the sea.”

Pliny the Elder (1st century AD) also reported about Hyperboreans settling in the forests and groves of the north and feeding on tree fruits. At the same time, he argued that this is where the “rotation point of the world” is located and the sun sets only once a year.

The ancient Greek heroes Hercules and Perseus visited the land of the Hyperboreans. The latter, as you know, killed the Gorgon Medusa, who turned people into frozen statues, that is, into ice. The titanide Leto was also from the country of the Hyperboreans, who gave birth to Apollo and Artemis on the island of Delos. By the way, Apollo, before his accession to Delphi, which was also founded by the Hyperboreans, lived for a long time in this northern country and subsequently visited it several times.

The reliability of these legends is confirmed by the fact: Herodotus describes the graves of two Hyperboreans, Arga and Otis, who came here with the Titanide Leto, which he saw on the island of Delos. In the 20s of our century, French archaeologists actually discovered various remains of tombs of “Hyperborean maidens” on Delos.

The ancient Greek author Diodorus (1st century BC) also speaks about the closeness of the Greeks and Hyperboreans, who emphasizes that the Hyperboreans “have their own language but are very close to the Hellenes, and especially to the Athenians and Delians, maintaining this arrangement since ancient times "

The Scandinavian sagas also mention the “land of the blessed” located in the Arctic Ocean, which in the Finnish epic is called the Northern House - “Saraias”, Royal Light (“Sara” - king, “yas” - clear light).

On the famous map of Gerardus Mercator (1512-1594), compiled by him in the 16th century on the basis of ancient knowledge, the land around the “Archtic Pole” is clearly depicted - a large continent, divided by four wide rivers-straits into four parts-islands.

The continent is separated from Eurasia and America by the “Sea of ​​Ice”. Near the North Pole itself there is a high single mountain - “Black Rock”. The mountain range encircling almost the entire continent is drawn in detail. The rivers are depicted with branched deltas and channel bends, and a description of their flow regime is given. About one of them, the notes say that it “has five branches and, due to the narrowness and speed of the current, never freezes.” About another it is reported that “here the river divides into three branches and remains under ice for three months every year.”

The north of Europe is surprisingly clearly depicted for that time: Scandinavia, the Kola Peninsula, the islands of Novaya Zemlya and Spitsbergen; Greenland, Iceland and even the disappeared Friesland are clearly shown.

Scientists have no doubt that this map could not have been compiled by G. Mercator, but is a tracing paper from an older source, and the source map is from an even earlier source. There is also no doubt that such a map could only be compiled using remote sensing aerospace materials, based on spherical trigonometry. The English scientist C. Hengutz in his book “The Path of the Pole” (1987) writes: “... there is evidence that ancient maps were collected and studied in the great Library of Alexandria, from where copies of these maps were moved to other centers of enlightenment...” and further: “... The earth was mapped in detail by the 4th century BC. an unknown civilization that has reached a high technical level."

The chronicle of Arctic exploration speaks of a continent that once existed at the North Pole. So, in the XVII-XVIII centuries. Andreev Land was discovered at the mouth of the Kolyma; later, north of Spitsbergen - Gillis Land; in the Chukchi Sea - Peasant Island, found by the schooner of the same name. In 1811, north of the Novosibirsk archipelago, Yakov Sannikov noticed a large island, in 1886 E.V. Toll (1858-1902) described it, a story about four flat mountains with low foothills, clearly visible in clear sunny weather.

Nowadays, many polar pilots, in particular, the famous navigator V.I. Exactly, they described several islands in the Arctic Ocean, seen from the air, which, unfortunately, have not yet been found by seafaring researchers. Two unknown islands, located 150 km from the North Pole, were photographed by Soviet pilots several years ago, but ice hummocks and constant fog prevent them from approaching them by sea. How time is reflected in the nature of northern latitudes can be seen in the following examples: in 1823, the explorer of the Siberian North, Lieutenant Peter Anzhu (1796-1869), landed on Semenovsky Island in the Laptev Sea; Having measured the island, he wrote in his report that its length was 15 km. Less than a century later, in 1912, according to the testimony of sailors from the Voygan ship, this value became equal to only 5 km. In 1936, Soviet hydrographers noted the length of the island as 2 km, and in 1955 Semenovsky Island was not found at all: only a sandbank remained under water.

In the same way, by our time, another island has disappeared into the depths of the sea - Vasilevsky, the coastal cliff of which was photographed in 1915 by the Russian researcher L.S. Staronadomsky. Nothing remains in the sea of ​​the islands of Mercury, Figurina and Diomede, which were mapped in the 18th century.

This subsidence of the earth's crust in the North Pole region continues in our time. The length of the coastline of the islands of the Novosibirsk archipelago is decreasing: for example, Bolshoi Lyakhovsky Island is going under water, where the speed of the sea advance reaches 20-30 meters per year. Following the assessment of oceanologist N.N. Zubov (1885-1960), made on the basis of his observations, it can be said without exaggeration that in another 10-20 years this island will no longer exist - just as Vasilievsky Island, Sannikov Land, Gilles Land, Avdreev Land and other islands of the Siberian coast did not exist before. Arctic Ocean.

The common fate of these islands suggests that these are the remnants of the once large continent of Arctida, destroyed as a result of a general catastrophe that occurred, as the calendars of the Egyptians, Assyrians and Mayans indicate, in 11542 BC.

The underwater Lomonosov Ridge, discovered by the famous Soviet polar explorer Ya.Ya. Gakkel (1901-1965), stretches across the entire Arctic - from the shelf of the New Siberian Islands to the Ellesmere Islands in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Its length is 1,700 kilometers, the peaks of the ridge rise 3, and sometimes 4 kilometers. From Wrangel Island to Ellesmere Island and Axel-Heiberg, under the waters of the Arctic Ocean, the Mendeleev Ridge stretches, discovered by Soviet polar explorers drifting at the SP-4 station in 1954. In length and height it is not inferior to the Lomonosov Ridge, and in the width of its base, reaching up to 900 kilometers, it even surpasses it.

On the tops of the Lomonosov and Mendeleev ridges, wide terraces were discovered, most likely formed by waves, although now these peaks are submerged to a depth of about a kilometer. Flat-topped mountains formed from atolls are found here - guyots and sunken volcanic islands. The dredges lifted jackdaws, rubble, boulders, gravel, and sand from the ridges. According to many signs, these continental sediments were formed here, in the central Arctic.

Map of underwater ridges of the Arctic region

Back in 1935, Professor A.I. Tolmachev publishes a book dedicated to comparing the plants of central Taimyr with the plants of Arctic America and Chukotka. This study revealed “the impossibility of connecting the Taimyr flora with the Canadian flora through the Chukchi flora,” and that it had great similarities with the flora of Arctic America. This is another confirmation of the existence of a large continent in the Arctic Ocean, providing a connection between the floras of Taimyr and Canada. The existence of Arctida is also indicated by data obtained by hydrobiologists, ornithologists, and specialists in marine mammals and mollusks.

According to Ya.Ya. Gakkel, this “Arctic bridge” existed 100 thousand years ago, and Professor A.I. Tolmachev believed that the exchange of plants between the north of the European continent and Arctic America took place until the end of the last glaciation. Marine geologists N.A. Belov and V.N. Lapin believe that certain parts of the Lomonosov and Mendeleev ridges were above water 16-18 thousand years ago. Academician A.F. Treshnikov (1914-1991) believes that parts of the Lomonosov Ridge could have reached the surface 8-18 thousand years ago. According to scientists - hydrobiologist Professor E.F. Guryanova and K.N. Nesis “...the barrier in the area of ​​the East Siberian Sea, the New Siberian Islands and Wrangel Island, that is, in the area of ​​the Lomonosov Ridge, existed for quite a long time and disappeared quite recently, at least in post-Littorian times,” which began only 2500 years ago.

The fact that grass grew on the lands of Arctida and that many animals lived, from giant mammoths to the smallest rodents, is evidenced by research by scientists from various fields. Mammoth tusks, bones of bulls and other large herbivores have been and will be found by bulldozer operators, radio operators, weather experts - in short, everyone who has worked or will work on the New Siberian Islands, Wrangel Island and Severnaya Zemlya.

The boundaries of finds of Paleolithic monuments are moving further and further to the north every year. Where it would seem that modern man cannot survive fully armed with science and technology, traces of our ancestors are found.

Distribution of glaciers in the northern hemisphere during the last glaciation. The North Pole and all lands of Siberia are free from continental ice

Findings by scientists from Yakutia and Magadan showed that man lived in the Far North of our country 5, 10, and 20 thousand years ago. Traces of human presence in Alaska, according to American scientists, date back even more anciently: 30, 40 and even 50 thousand years.

You can find a lot of evidence confirming the existence of a mild climate on the Arctic. This miracle of the protected land is explained not only by the fact that previously the Gulf Stream, whose water flow is 20 times higher than the total water flow of all rivers on the globe, carried its warm waters with a temperature of 20-28 degrees not to the island of Spitsbergen and Novaya Zemlya, as now, but to the North Pole, but also by the geomagnetic distribution of heat on the planet.

The geological record of the Earth suggests that for hundreds of thousands of years the north of Europe, North America, part of Asia and even Africa was occupied by continental ice - a powerful ice shell hundreds of meters thick. This ice sheet, similar to the modern ice of Antarctica and Greenland, has repeatedly changed its position on the planet in the past. At the same time, the climate of these regions also changed significantly - the lands of the Crimea and the North Caucasus in the past corresponded to the tundra, and in the modern tundra there was lush forest vegetation. Such changes were not associated with general warming throughout the Earth due to the accumulation of heat on the planet, that is, with the greenhouse effect in its modern sense. Significant climate changes occurred as a result of heat redistribution within the framework of the general and relatively constant heat balance of the planet. This is evidenced by numerous conclusions from scientific studies of the Earth’s paleomagnetism and its paleoclimate.

Scientists from many countries of the world, in particular, K. Birkenmaier from Poland, A. Nairn from Great Britain, studied the magnetization of ancient rocks, its magnitude and direction, which arose and left a mark in the rocks during their formation. These indicators indicate the geographical position of the magnetic poles, which, in turn, determine the climatic regions on the planet at different times. At the same time, the “drift” of the continents was taken into account, and magnetic-stratigraphic scales were compiled for the last millions of years of the Earth’s existence.

It turned out that the geomagnetic poles not only significantly changed their location on the planet, but also the magnetic field strength and even its polarity changed, that is, the North and South Pole changed places.

One of these inversions, which occurred about 65 million years ago, coincided with the death of dinosaurs and many other animal species. The last time it happened was about 800 thousand years ago.

Research using the “fossil compass” method also revealed that, following the movement of geomagnetic poles, the position of continental ice also changed. According to paleomagnetic data, there was a time when the magnetic pole was in the Sahara. In turn, paleoclimatic studies have confirmed the existence of sedimentary rocks of glacial origin in southern Algeria. Then the pole moved to the region of South Africa, to the modern equator, where traces of powerful glaciation were discovered: it was something similar to the modern ice dome of Antarctica. It was at this time that the lands of the modern tundras of the European North were distinguished by lush forest vegetation, and the level of the World Ocean just a few hundred thousand years ago was 150-200 m lower than today. At the same time, the Gulf Stream carried its life-giving waters to the Arctic, and the vast spaces of the current shelves were low-lying coastal plains. England was uniting with Europe, the English Channel and the North Sea did not exist. Asia and North America were connected by a land bridge in the region of Chukotka and Alaska. In northeastern Siberia, the land extended far to the North, and the current islands of Indonesia were connected to Southeast Asia. General warming in northern Europe and America began about 20 thousand years ago. At first it happened slowly, and the boundary of continental ice slowly retreated to the north. A sharp climate change occurred about 12 thousand years ago.

Over the next 4-5 thousand years, the ice in northern Europe and North America disappeared completely. Subarctic forests have again shifted by about 300 km. north of their current polar border, and in the 7th-5th millennium BC. temperatures in the north did not drop below 0 degrees Celsius even in January. Melting ice has led to a significant rise in sea levels. It was during this relatively recent time that the oceans and continents of the Earth acquired the shapes familiar to us.

The general conclusion of research using the “fossil compass” method suggests that previously the Earth’s rotation axis (geographic poles) did not coincide significantly with its geomagnetic axis (geomagnetic poles). At the same time, the precession of the rotation axis had little effect on the position of the planet relative to the Sun when orbiting around it, and therefore on the angles of incidence of solar rays on the Earth’s surface and on the amount of total solar radiation. At the same time, the magnetic poles and associated glaciers were much closer to the modern equator, and climatic thermal zones were located concentrically around them.

This means that general changes in the climate of the earth’s continents depend not only on the angles of incidence of the sun’s rays on them, but also to no less extent on changes in the position of the geomagnetic poles. It is these two reasons that determine the amount of heat received by the Earth.

A clear confirmation of the possibility of a significant discrepancy between the geographic and magnetic poles during the development of planets and the distribution of temperatures on them depending on the geomagnetic situation, and not just on the angles of incidence of solar rays on the surface of the planets, is information about the 8th and 9th planets of the solar system - Uranus and Neptune, obtained using the American Voyager 2 spacecraft. Information about Uranus was transmitted by the device in 1986, and about Neptune - in 1989.

It turned out that Uranus has a strong magnetic field, almost the same as that of the Earth, but the deviation of its magnetic axis from the geographic one is almost 60 degrees, while that of the Earth is now about 11 degrees.

The direction of Uranus’ rotation axis also turned out to be unusual: it revolves around the Sun “lying on its side.” It is also interesting that on Uranus it is coldest at the equator, although it is its daytime surface that is illuminated more than others by the rays of the Sun and therefore should be the warmest. However, of the geographic poles of Uranus, the one that is located on the unlit side of the planet, where the night has been going on for decades, is warmer.

A similar geomagnetic situation occurs on Neptune. All this is reminiscent of the climatic thermal situation on Earth in the distant past, when its geomagnetic pole and the associated ice dome were at the equator.

The research of our weather scientists also contains other evidence concerning the state of northern nature in the 10th-7th millennium BC, confirming the retreat of the glacier from here long before this time.

The message of Dr. Jones Hammer, who stated in 1993 at a press conference in Amsterdam that during his trip to the North Pole he discovered a polar city, is also very interesting: “There are houses, palaces, places of worship there. The Eskimos could not have built such a city - this was the work of a highly developed civilization,” says Hammer.

In his opinion, 90 percent of buildings are hidden by eternal snow and ice. However, the tops of the houses are visible. Already the first surveys showed that the buildings are more than one thousand years old.

“Of course, it’s not easy to conduct archaeological excavations in the Arctic,” says Hammer. “Therefore, we know little about the unusual ice city and the civilization that built it. The architecture of the buildings, which we were able to partially see, is reminiscent of ancient Greek.

These houses and palaces are real art. We are sure of this. It remains a mystery why it was necessary to build the city in such harsh conditions for people’s lives. And also how did you manage to build it?

We cannot explain this..."

All the above-mentioned evidence confirms that on this Earth (planet) the ancestral home of the Slavic-Aryans (Race) is Arctida (Daaria), located at the north pole.

...And Niy and the Elements will destroy that land,

and she will hide in the depths of the Great Waters,

just like she hid in ancient times

in the depths of the northern waters is the Sacred Daaria.

1. The Vedas are the sacred books of the Slavic-Aryans, the most ancient written monuments. See part two, chap. 3.

2. G.M. Bongard-Levine, E.A. Grantovsky “From Scythia to India.” M., 1983.

3. The Book of Manu (laws of Manu) is an ancient Indian collection of instructions left to people by the progenitor of mankind, Manu. See book. 2, words. 22.

4. Vara - ship, ark; from “varat” - to swim.

5. U A.S. Pushkin is “...thirty Knights Beautiful... And with them their sea uncle.” "Ruslan and Ludmila". M., 1985.

6. Y.P. Mirolyubov “The Tale of Grandmother Varvara”, vol. 9.

7. Slavic-Aryan Vedas, book 1. Omsk, 2001.

8. Indische alte Geschichte. Th. Kruse, with reference to Mahabh. W. 10503 C. Lassen's Ind. Alterthumskunde.

9. G.A. Razumov, M.F. Khalin "Sinking Cities". M., 1991.

10. G.M. Bongard-Levine, E.A. Grantovsky. Decree. Op.

11. “Our plans for winter” (edited by B. John, translated from English by L.R. Serebryanny). M, 1982.

12. “Paleomagnetic record of the Earth,” p. 119-129. M., 1984.

13. Inversion (lat.) - turning over, rearranging. Geomagnetic field inversion is a change in the direction (polarity) of the Earth's magnetic field to the opposite.

14. The “fossil compass” method - determining the geomagnetic pole of the Earth. It is based on the fact that mineral crystals are formed in accordance with the geomagnetic field of the Earth. Knowing when the mineral was formed, one can determine where the geomagnetic pole was at that time.

15. E.P. Borisenkov, V.M. Pasetsky "Thousand-year chronicle of extraordinary natural phenomena." M., 1988.

16. Precession (lat.) - a slow displacement of the Earth’s rotation axis in space.

Views: 2,488

Chapter 2: Hyperborea – The Arctic Homeland of the Aryans

Hyperborea – Sacred Belovodye of the ancient Slavs.................................. 81

Polar symbolism among the northern peoples.................................................... 81

Direct evidence of the existence of Hyperborea.................................. 84

Death of Hyperborea................................................... ................................... 86

Chapter 3: Origin and essence of the ancient Slavic faith ............... 88

Hyperborean faith of the Rus.................................................... .................... 88

Mystical teaching of the Ostyaks.................................................................... ................... 90

Preface by O.V. Stukova

to Sat. "History of the Ancient Slavs" issue 1 / St. Petersburg, 2007/

When we, NOT HISTORIANS, began compiling this collection, we had 2 dozen volumes of books on this topic in front of us, and it was clear that we would have to write notes and reviews of all these voluminous works ourselves. Some of these books can never be read by a reader from the outback, while others are quite accessible, but are heavily littered with false hypotheses, interpretations and misunderstandings of the author...

For example:

1.most “classical” historians don’t even want to hear about the Slavs BC, about the Book of Veles, about Hyperborea...

“...the science of history is skillfully directed in a certain direction, only those areas that we call “biblical archeology”, “Old Testament and Romano-Germanic history” are funded.” All others are obviously drowned out, suppressed... History is written by the winner...” /Y.D.Petukhov /.

This is understandable: history and chronicles were repeatedly destroyed and rewritten by new rulers. Now this is Western civilization - more precisely, they think so... Their “Norman” theory imposed on us, according to which the Russians only climbed down from the tree in the 10th century, to be baptized and led out of savagery onto the bright path of Western civilization - we won’t even bother here consider.

2. Another extreme: according to the same Petukhov, it turns out that already 40 thousand years ago all of Europe and half of Asia were Russians, or according to V.M. Kandyba - that already 18 million years ago (!) everyone on the planet was Russians...

It is clear that such odious theories in the style of “Russia is the birthplace of elephants” only compromise serious historical research.

Below we consider several of the main theories of the history of the Slavs, in our opinion, with evidence. Our own positions, the distinctive features of this collection, are as follows. We believe:

- into the reality of ancient Arctic Hyperborea - ancestral home of the Aryans, the ancestors of not only the Hindus, but also the majority of the peoples of Eurasia;

- in the antiquity of the Proto-Slavic peoples (at least 20 thousand years);

- in their presence even BC. its Vedic (Aryan-Hyperborean) Cultures and scripts. And the main thing is that:

“The past of our people is glorious. His future is wonderful!”

/from an ancient prophecy/.

Generally accepted chronology

8th century BC - mention by the prophet Ezekiel (Bible) of a certain powerful tribe led by a prince named Ros /1 /.

179 BC - the beginning of Great Sarmatia - Prince Gatal the Great expelled Scythians- nomads from the Russian Plain (from Tanais (Don) to Borysthenes (Dnieper). First mention Rusov (Roksolanov) / Strabo, Greek. historian /1 /..

103 BC - Chimer invasion of Rome: “Our fathers were Chimers, and they shook Rome, and we kind Wend sky" / 1/ . Let's also compare: Cimmeria - ancient. name Crimea and Kem - other names. Egypt...

1st century AD - Roman historians Pliny Jr. and Tacitus: « Slavs reign from the Don to the Dnieper" and "10 thousand heavy cavalry Roksolan defeated by Roman legions at the Trojan Wall." Also: Tacitus indicated that rugi live in the Western Baltic /3/. However, in German chronicles up to the 10th century. rugi And Rus (ruten) do not differ /3/.

240 - those who came goths burned the capital Ruskolani the city of Voronzhents and the city of Tanais /1/. (Wed: with modern times. name Voronezh! - O.S.).

376 - invasion Huns from the East to the Black Sea region /2/

430 - Kyiv was founded...

455 - capture of Rome vandals Geiseric /2/.

476 - capture of Rome by Odoacer (leader vandal-rugov -

Chronicles of Rus' used:

? THE TALE OF THE Scythians and Slovenes

1030 - chronicle of Joachim of Korsun, Bishop of Novgorod;

1037-39 - the oldest Kiev vault (Nikon the Great);

1111-14 - “The Tale of Bygone Years” by St. Nestor;

1113-17 - “The Tale of Bygone Years” by Abbot Sylvester.

Stukova O.V.

2: The path of the Aryans and the ancestors of the Slavs:

North - Middle East - Europe

(brief literature review)

Exodus of the Aryans from the North

So, after a planetary catastrophe that led to the death of Hyperborea - a warm oasis at the North Pole (the date is not known, but between 20 and 13 thousand years ago) those who inhabited it Arias moved south. Now, with the advent of A.A. Klyosov’s data on DNA genealogy and, more appropriately, the DNA CHRONOLOGY of these events is updated to approximately 14 thousand years ago - most likely it was this cataclysm that provoked mutations in the occurrence of 3 more genes in addition to the main “Aryan” gene" R1a. More details - let the experts judge

Above, in Chapter 1 it was explained who they were Arias and what is Hyperborea, their Arctic ancestral home. Since the period of their habitation in polar Ariavarta-Hyperborea ended in such ancient (pre-literate) times, we can only rely on oral sources. Most Arias they speak about themselves (more precisely about their Hyperborean ancestors) in their ancient and very voluminous epic, the Vedas. Already by its name one can see the close kinship of our peoples. Let's take our Slavic folk tales - they constantly mention the Far Away Kingdom (Sunflower - the sun shines there for half a year), etc. legendary welfare state (this root " good" - already sounds in the main part of the Vedic code: Bhaga-vad-Gita, which is a documentary chronicle of the most important battle of the Aryans). The gods reign in this Promised Land - this is what it seems to our ancestors who went there. They control the climate - and at the North Pole there is eternal summer, blooming gardens, an abundance of food and everything for life. They fly on some kind of magical devices (in the Vedas they are called “vimanas” and look more like an airplane than a carpet...). The whole book of the Vedas, Vimanika Shastra, describes the structure of these aircraft. In this case, it is logical to assume that while the mass of people walked from north to south on foot, the leaders of the Aryans could fly to warmer climes, for example, to the Middle East - on vimanas, which produced the effect of gods coming from the sky on the wild population. We'll look at this next.

So, probably, the Aryans, escaping the advancing polar cold, walked partly through Siberia, where many tribes remained, and partly through European territory Slavs, who were their main support - their daughter people (“grandsons of Dazhdbog”, i.e. close descendants of Solntsebog-Apollo). As we know from fairy tales and the Book of Veles and will see below, Slavs have long been closely spiritually connected with the Vedic spiritual system Ariev.

Fig. 1: Typical Aryan images found in the Urals and Siberia /from the book by Yu.D. Petukhov/.

In the top 2 figures in the circle we recognize the characteristic Shiva-Nataraja, the dancing Shiva, one of the main deities-incarnations of the Aryan-Vedic pantheon.

It is difficult for us to set the pace of progress now Ariev-immigrants. According to B.G. Tilak (see ABOVE IN CHAPTER 1), an Indian Brahmin scientist of the 19th century, even in the period 6-9 thousand years ago the main masses Ariev were in the Arctic Circle. This is proven by the characteristic polar images in the text of the Indian Vedas, which were composed precisely at that time and in that region, and they were written down no later than 6 thousand years ago - this is determined by the position of the constellations, also indicated in the texts of the Vedas.

Fig. 3: Swastikas on ceramics from Samarra (6-5 thousand years BC)

/from the book by Yu.D. Petukhov/.

The few tribes remaining in Palestine and Mesopotamia Borusov By that time, they had developed unique ceramics - with characteristic very beautiful and varied patterns based on the swastika - the polar-solar sacred symbol of the Aryans. Swastikas have already been found in Mezina (Dnieper region) - this is 25 thousand years old! The swastikas of Samarra and Halafa (between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers) are already 6 thousand years old. Moreover, others could have come from the north, from the Caucasus borus the same pre-Slavic root - THE SAME CULTURE! This is further proof of relationship Rusov with the then peoples of the Caucasus and their connections with Arias.

A bold question arises: are not the contemporaries of Christ Samaritans, Midianites(they lived there a little earlier - see in the Bible: Moses studied with the Midianite priest) and Galileans- direct descendants of those pre-Slavs? Let us remember the episode with the Good Samaritan, the words of Christ - that He came "not healthy (to the Samaritan people) and to the sick sheep of the people of Israel "... The Samaritans and Galileans were not Jews - just like Christ himself, who is not called in the Gospel by his neighbors other than “this Galilean (!)." They were fair-haired and blue-eyed - like the Savior himself!!! And that's a fact. They had a Vedic faith in the One God and did not need Salvation (version of the Ossetian restoration historian V. Sabantion).

As mentioned in the Old Testament , "the children of Israel killed the princes of Midian, Hebiah, Rekem, Chur, Horus and Reba and Balaam, the soothsayer".../Numbers 31:8-9, as well as Joshua 13:22 - repeated in 2 places in the Bible, which means it was important.../. Let's pay attention: the names are familiar, Slavic.

But it turns out there were also later campaigns from the Caucasus to the south: the oldest in Asia Minor, the mighty Hittite a power that existed in what is now Turkey from at least 2.5 to 1200 BC, was conquered by a local tribe Hurrians- inhabitants of the South Caucasus, lake area Van / Volkov and Nepomniachtchi. Hittites /. These invincible (even then!) warriors did not stop there - they conquered - Egypt(!), where under the name Hyksos (“shepherd kings”, that's what the Greeks called them ) for almost a century and a half they were ruled quite culturally...

There is also a completely Slavic history of a similar campaign - from the chronicle “The Legend of Scythians and Slovenes...”: there the founding of Veliky Novgorod (old name Slovensk) dates back to 3099 years from the Creation of the world, i.e. 2409 BC (!!) and, by the way, is mentioned among the victorious campaigns not only “to the limits of the Arctic Sea”, to Siberia (“along the great Ob River”), but even “the campaign against the Egyptian countries and the war and much bravery was shown in the Jerusalem and Barbarian countries..."

Let us remember here that the ancient self-name Egypt - Kem...The land of Crimea and its inhabitants were also called Chimers, or Cimmerians... And even the Novgorodians in the 9th century will say to Askold: “Our fathers were Chimers, and they shook Rome...” And maybe the northern Russian city was named in memory of the southern ancestral home Kem. Or maybe vice versa: - after all, in the Russian North, such a name is just typical: there were still peoples there all, water, burst, sum, etc... And Rus' fits well into this series...

So who came from whom!?

And the Mahatmas in the Secret Doctrine directly let slip that:

"...Egyptians OUR Caucasian family..."

We mean the Caucasus especially - as a certain the umbilical cord of Eurasia, a kind of “cauldron”, where, perhaps, the languages ​​of all of Europe were “brewed” in millennia of antiquity and such linguistic relics have been preserved to this day, by which all this can now be easily proven. So Galgai language of Chechens and Ingush stands exactly halfway between Slavic languages ​​and Sanskrit From some of its roots, Western European roots clearly grow... But about this - in the article by Bislan Ferkh.

Rice. 4: Map of the settlement of the peoples of Europe (II-III millennium BC)

Rice. 5: Map of migrations during the Great Migration (first centuries AD)

/according to P.Tulaev.Veneta: ancestors of the Slavs. - M: White Alva, 2000/.

Settlement maps Roxolanov and just aces(by P. Tulaev) clearly show the migration path of descendants Asov and Vanov from the North Caucasus to the North-West - in the form Celts, Later Vandals, Goths, Chimers and partially Venedov- the latter are already larger Slavs(which is confirmed by the text of the “Veles Book”).

All these global migrations of peoples, according to L.N. Gumilyov, followed certain paths - recently, Moscow geologist Felix Roizenman showed that these paths always coincided with the junctions of tectonic plates, and during the period of activation of underground radiation emissions.

So, according to the maps given by P. Tulaev, aces lived along the Dnieper back in the 6th century AD. At the same time, modern Ossetians, as mentioned above, they derive their race directly from Asov, Alans, as well as from Ass irii. And this is not just a play on words. This is confirmed in Pavel Tulaev’s book by maps from different authors.

Generally recognized ancient finds (Kostenki, Sungir, Willendorf - Austria, Lespuga - France and many others), which date back to the 10-24th millennium BC. - prove that the so-called boreals- inhabitants of territories north of the Mediterranean - lived throughout Europe since 25 thousand years BC. /according to Yu.D. Petukhov/, and from the 10th millennium BC, after the glacier retreated to the north, small streams of settlers from the Middle East, where the main peoples then lived, began to turn into rivers... Boreals from Spain to the Urals and Baikal, they built the same type of round houses coated with clay. The frame - depending on the local material - was mammoth tusks, poles or rods intertwined with vines. Such huts can still be seen today in our Ukraine... A.A. Klyosov proved by DNA genealogy that about 22 thousand years ago the gene of the Proto-Slavs arose and all of this early population of Europe possessed these genes, i.e. was PROTO-SLAVIC. However, according to his data, later new tribes of Erbins came from Altai along the southern route (the coast of Africa) to Spain and displaced or even exterminated the Proto-Slavs of Western Europe.

The settlement of Europe after the Atlantic Flood did not proceed immediately and clearly from south to north, as the glacier retreated and the climate warmed. Therefore, it is absolutely clear that the southern regions were populated first - the Balkans, the Apennine Peninsula, the Northern Black Sea region - the mouth of the Don (then Tanais). (Moreover, new immigrants came from places of long-standing dense habitation - from the Near and Middle East). The famous researcher of the early history of the Slavs, Pavel Tulaev, convincingly proves on the basis of large archaeological material that all these areas were already inhabited then Proto-Slavs, known by the names Venedov (enets, genets), Antes, Ases, Yazians (Yazygs– isn’t this where the “pagans” come from?), Alanov, Roksolanov... After all, V. Tatishchev wrote:

“...the Finns call the Germans saxoline,

Swedes – Roxoline, Russians veneline, yourself sumalayn..."

That is, the ending “line”, “ Alans“among the Finns it simply means people, although in the Chechen-Ingush language LAN is LEV (Rus-lan = Ars-lan - “Light Lion”, Bislan - “Lion King”, etc...) By the way, Finns and Estonians are still since then they call Russians - Vienna. It is clear that this is where it came from Wends.

Archpriest S. Lyashevsky) and professor of the Australian University in Canberra S.Ya. Paramonov (pseudonym Sergei Lesnoy), believed that despite the widespread dominance "Norman" theory origin Rusov supposedly from the German-Scandinavian tribes through the Varangians of Rurik (we have already examined the absurdity of such an opinion) - there is serious evidence of the opposite - southern, Balkan, Caucasian and other origins Rusov(and even themselves Celts - from Sarmatians!). According to the venerable authors listed above, our ancestors at the turn of our era are, first of all:

1) Carpathians and Danube - Rusyns, Rutenes(in Latin), Czechs, Croats, Poles (from the glades).

2) Ruskolan(in Greek pronunciation - Roxolans) - and prof. S. Paramonov ties it to the southern Baltic (those who went north Swede aces), and Rev. S. Lyashevsky - to the southern steppes. And both are right: in the south - Sarmatians And Scythians, which came partly from the south, from Iran, partly from the east, from the Kazakh steppes - these are typical Slavs, who spoke at the beginning of the era in the language of the Book of Veles (see their path in its text itself), and themselves Tauro-Scythians(Greek term) called themselves RUSSIAN/according to S. Lyashevsky .

3) Baltics- incl. island Rügen(Brawler!) - rugs, rutens. Further - on the Neva and Ladoga, in Novgorod - slo(a)vyane.

Askold and Dir, those who came from there to Kyiv, blamed their local pagan commanders:

“You are not Russians at all, you are barbarians!” to which they replied:

- Our fathers were Chimers, and they shook Rome, and we kind of Wendish» /according to S. Lyashevsky/.

So, there were Kievan, Novgorod, Danube, Crimean-Korsun, Scythian, Siberian, Asia Minor, Northern Rus (from where Rurik was invited)... There is an original explanation for this - the hypothesis of Valery Sabantion. He believes that the Rus' is a form of government:

- a fortified city with veche self-government and an elected prince-voivode;

Army - Cossack type, when the best warriors (with or without families) receive, having a house and land, also contentment from the city. This way of life ensures: a) education of warriors from childhood, based on tribal and national traditions and martial arts; and b) the number of well-trained troops, almost equal to the size of the ENTIRE male population from 16 to 60 years old.

It was precisely this form, powerful and invincible army of Atlantis that Plato admired in his dialogues Timaeus and Critias. But the united army of the mainland defeated the superior forces of the invaders - Atlanteans on the very first day of the battle (and only the global catastrophe of the next night took away their victory, washing away both the colonialists and the defenders in a gigantic wave...) And just this way of life was characteristic of the southern Russians for centuries Cossacks- It is unlikely that they adopted it from strangers.

Val. Sabantion also offers a version - why the name of the people is RUSSIAN - the only adjective of all peoples of Eurasia! He (a restorer, an expert on the history of not only his native Ossetia, but also the entire region, signing his drawings in ancient Babylonian...) believes that:

RUSSIANS are actually those same warriors and free citizens who have the right to vote at the Assembly;

RUSSICH are their hired people, and

RUSSIANS are peoples and tribes that have already joined -

(whose are you? - Russians!). Rus' is a very ancient unique VOLUNTARY Union of Peoples, whom no one conquered with the sword, did not enslave, or forced their ancestors to change their faith!

It is logical, in any case, other nations did not form such a complex chain of adjectives from their naming and did not merge other peoples into themselves so gently, without violence - and at the same time on such a scale...

The ornithological observations of V. Shcherbakov are interesting. He erects the name of the Great Mother Goddess, which is now very popular among new Russophiles. Mother-Match"to the Swan Maiden (and not - it’s terrible to repeat this nonsense - to the dark owl bird, as some authors took from the air and fooled thousands of readers!..) After all, in the Scandinavian languages ​​and English " matchmaker» ( swan) - "swan"! And this is a very fruitful discovery: the role of the image Virgo-Swans in Russian fairy tales does not require discussion, but in Hyperborea Swan (symbol of the Sun God Apollo!) - the most sacred bird. According to the legends and testimonies of the Greeks, it was flocks of sacred swans that participated in the mysteries in Hyperborea and, with their singing of divine sound, introduced those present into ecstasy. And our expression “swan song”, apparently, is so ancient that it has already lost and distorted its original meaning - not the last song, but the Divine Song! In the end the root NVA and in Sanskrit it means Heavenly (sky - svarga), “Good”, SACRED, i.e. Mother of the World! Or Mother Glory- as it is directly written in the Book of Veles!

There is a distinct Triglav Trinity: God the Father, Mother Glory (emanating from Him - yes, it’s the Holy Spirit!) and the Roof-Krishna-Christ-Christ - the Son-Savior!..

Such a linguistic turn is also possible - from there Slavs! As they themselves said:

- We are God's only praise, and we never ask Him for anything! He is our Father, He gives us everything!... That’s why we are SLAVS!

By the way, according to V. Shcherbakov, the Greeks will have a swan “ artu", and Yaroslavna is crying on the Kyiv wall " arch teach”, i.e. like a swan, and at the same time flying “cuckoo along the Danube”! So the Danube is for Russians- Homeland of our ancestors. On Etruscan in the mirrors, framed by legible Slavic runes, a swan goddess is visible... (see IN THE COLLECTION in the chapter on the writing of the Slavs).

By the way, if you remember all the animal symbols of the gods, then:

Apollo is a swan, a falcon, a leopard-lion and a dolphin;

Aphrodite - dove,

Poseidon - horse

Zeus is an eagle, a bull, and here

Athena, the killer of the Swan Goddess of Hyperborean - owl...

These are the animals in which these gods turned... For the origin of most of these mythical “gods” - in contrast to the Slavic ones - see above (and in the book - in Chapter 3).

The same Vladimir Shcherbakov found the successful origin of the word Moscow- after all, this is also one of the names of our ancestors - Moscow ovitis. Turns out, MOSkh (Moscow) y Vanov meant great, big, strong (compare also - mos ol, power b, even brain- also smart!). And the names of tribes with this ending on the Russian Plain can be listed endlessly - they are of the same type (from my native Volga region): Mordva, Morkva, Chuva, and also further east - Tuva... In my childhood they even said - Tatarva ... This, although somewhat derogatory, is quite natural for the Russian language to form the name of the people.

There are other interpretations, and from the same Shcherbakov: clans and tribes were still more often named after their legendary ancestor, and there was such Mosoh Yafetovich(!), from whom, according to tales, we went Moskhs, Mosokhi, Mossens and Muscovites.

However, the most reasonable hypothesis about the prince Mosche- the founder of the city of Moscow - belongs to Alexander Asov, the first (but not very correct) translator and popularizer of Veles's book. On its wooden tablet “Lut II, 6:1” we read:

And so we begin to remember Mosca, who united the Slavs and took care of the unity of the land... And then we each went our own way: some remained where they were, while other clans flowed to the North. And that was the point Vyatichi and Radomich...»

All this is very likely, especially since the Mosca previously lived in the southern regions (we will look at this now) - from the Danube to Kyiv - captured in the 6th century goths. In 543, their king Triedoreus hanged his father Mosha- Prince of Kievan Rus Svyatoyar (510-543). And his three sons - Pirogoshch, Radogoshch and Mosk that they reigned then on the Danube and in the Carpathians, returned and took revenge on the villains. However, under the blows of superior Byzantine troops, they were forced to retreat to the North and North-East, leaving the Danube region... Then (in 597 according to the same Veles book) the prince Mosk was elected “single prince” of the Rus. It was then that he soon founded it in the North. city ​​of Mosca", hail MOSCOW(that’s what it was called in Europe to this day!) on a river similarly named - river Moscow(!), as well as on another river named in memory of the Danube - Istra (!). Europeans still call the Danube Istr (from the Middle Eastern great Mother - the goddess Ishtar!).

V. Shcherbakov also traces the direction of migration of Caucasian Vanov to the North - to the upper Don and Oka - in the form Vyatichi, which the Arabs called “ vantit".. Additional evidence is provided by the characteristic female dances of those places where women depict birds, and permission for consanguineous marriages (described in Vanov Snorri Sturluson, author of the Prose Edda) - the latter is clearly an attempt to preserve the purity of the blood of the ancestors, as we discussed above. This was the practice among the pharaohs of Egypt, among the royal families of Europe, among the Jews - but every time it ended badly - with the accumulation of hereditary diseases and degeneration...

A. Asov considers the most direct descendants Vanov in the Caucasus - Vainakhs (Chechen and Ingush) (see the COLLECTION article by Bislan Ferkh), and Asov - Ossetian. However, Al. Asov is a great dreamer, and he even goes as far as searching for the descendants of the Atlanteans (Aztecs) among the Caucasian peoples... However, in the Caucasus there are languages ​​(Georgian and the same Vainakh), which have up to 80% of even verbal roots with Sanskrit /Bislan Ferkh/.

But let's return to Central Europe, where at the beginning of the era Slavs occupied large territories. And it is obvious that from ancient times... If we talk about the names of tribes and clans, then in the time of Julius Caesar, according to P. Tulaev, in the northeast of the Alps and further north, to the Baltic Sea, a tribe passed and settled there rurik (raurik), possibly named after the river Ruhr (Raura) - this is where they got their generic name Ruriki. Another version of the origin of this surname: in its Latin spelling Roerick in German it reads " Rorik", which is pronounced in Russian with a bias in " Rurik", although clearly comes from " rereg" - in Polish, “falcon”, by the way, which adorned the coat of arms of the Rurik family and then - it is not clear by what right - transferred to the coat of arms of present-day Ukraine - so called " Rurik falcon».

That clan or tribe Rurik in the center of Western Europe was Slavic, Just Russian origin - it is already clear from the fact that our great-grandfather, called to reign in Novgorod Rurik was Burivoy, and grandfather (his son) Gostomysl. Burivoy he lived most of his life in Russia, north of Novgorod, then, apparently, he and his family went north, to Karelia, as Paranin has now found out, where our Rurik was born (see Paranin’s article in issue 2 of our collection). Him, grandson Gostomysl(already the 9th generation of Novgorod princes!) Novgorodians-Slovenians and called to reign. For some reason, the long and glorious reign of Gostomysl and Burivoy is not reflected anywhere in the chronicle and it begins with Rurik, again called by the Novgorodians from the same glorious princely family - he was the son of one of the three daughters of Gostomysl, married, very far-sightedly, to European princes and kings. Apparently, the earlier part of the chronicle was lost... Or maybe it was helped to “get lost” by those who were interested in turning things around in such a way that Russians savages and at least -

“Our land is great and abundant, but outfit not in it"/The Tale of Bygone Years of Nestor/

And they are forced to order “foreign Varangians” from Europe to reign as rulers... And the word outfit translated as order, but what was meant was the law, the legitimate prince who received outfit to reign! This was opened and analyzed in very detail and convincingly by S. Lesnoy.

Is it necessary to explain the fact (proven by Pavel Tulaev and the group of Yugoslav historians to whom he refers) that by at least the 4th century AD. most of central Europe still was inhabited by Slavic tribes or was strongly influenced by Slavic culture - a sharp knife for “Westerners”, supporters of the “Nordic” version of the development of Europe. They are ready to hide any facts, they do not admit the obvious - for them, Slavic culture in general began almost with the Baptism of Rus'... Alas, we must admit that this is beneficial for the Church itself... “Westerners” are even ready to deny the Slavic character of the Lusatian culture in Central Europe, the clearly Slavic character of the Central European state of Noricum (southern Germany), which was part of the Roman Empire along with Raetia, Pannonia and Illyria. The Tale of Bygone Years directly speaks about the inhabitants of Central European Norik, with which Rus' then had very close ties:

– « Narcis are the essence of Slovenia» - immediately after the words about the origin Slavs“from the Afetov tribe” /according to P. Tulaev/.

It is not our task to cover the wide migrations of the Slavic population throughout Europe at a later time, for example in our era. A few more simply amazing facts are enough: who would have thought that the influence Slavs spread to the West right up to Spain - even if the most common surnames there Gonzalez and Velazquez are of Slavic origin! It turns out (as the same Pavel Tulaev proved) the root “ gonsa" - goose(in Polish), and it was brought to the West, of course, Baltic Wends. Therefore our Lithuanians, descended from them, there are still consonant surnames and names. Not to mention the origin of the word "caballo" from the mare...

And Velazquez generally comes from the Baltic Beluskas, i.e. from VELES on one side and BAAL-WHITE-WHITEN-BELBOG-APOLLO! Since these are all different (although clearly related) names of the Sun God among the post-Hyperborean peoples.

It remains to be mentioned Ruyan Island (Rügen)) in the Baltic Sea and on it a large Slavic-Hyperborean cult center Arkona with a giant wooden statue of Triglav (Svyatovid-Radagast), the main god of the Slavic pantheon. This center was destroyed already in Christian times. But STILL in Poland they say instead of “greeting with bread and salt” - greeting “AS RADAGAST ORDERED”!..

In addition to this sanctuary of the Slavs, P. Tulaev believes, Ruyan created in Europe " a whole system of city-states, similar to Adriatic Venice and Eastern European Gardarike...: Stargrad (Oldenburg), Lubich (Lubeck), Ratibor (Ratzeburg), Zwerin (Schwerin) and Rodstock (Rostock)... Retra in Mecklenburg, Szczecin (Stettin), Demin and Wolgast in Pomerania, the Wolin (Julin) shopping center located at the mouth of the Odra and others..."

So, by the beginning of our era, in fact, the Slavs were the main builders of such city-states in central Europe.

As mentioned above, according to the widely known and circulated in more than 100 handwritten copy copies of the Old Russian “ The Legend of Sloven and Rus"(another version of the name...about Scythians and Slovians") city Slovensk on the banks of the Volkhov River and Lake Ilmen (predecessor Vel.Novgorod)- was founded back in 2409 BC!. The legend speaks of forefathers and leaders Slavic people who, after centuries of wandering, came to these shores in the middle of the 3rd millennium BC. This is a very condensed history of the centuries-old history of the people - after all, it mentions, as in the Book of Veles, wanderings and life in distant lands - in Asia Minor, even an episode with the invasion of “ours” on Egypt (!).

Are they really ancient? Rus-Slovenes were so closely associated with Hurrian-Hyksos, mentioned above, that they identified their history with theirs?!

To dispel another "Norman" theory about the origin Celtic peoples - we present the results of a study by the famous American scientist and writer Farley Mowat ("From Aryans to Vikings", M: EKSMO, 2004) on the origin of the mythical, although quite real, North British people Picts.

Already in 50-51. BC. from Gaul and Brittany (the places between the Loire and Seine rivers - there was no Paris yet!) who lived there Armoricans(branch Venedov) in the amount of several thousand sailed away from the advancing Romans to the British Isles. Despite long preliminary reconnaissance raids and careful negotiations with the local population, they barely managed to settle only in the north of Scotland, ousting the aborigines there. Albans(hence the name Britain Albion) and becoming a human shield on the way of those approaching from the south Celts(here they are, just arrived!). The Armorican settlers built for defense characteristic round tower-fortresses without windows - broci - a double wall of stone without cement with a passage between them - which can now be found only in Corsica (which proves their origin from the south). Corsica was Spanish at one time - maybe this is where the newcomers began to be called Pictish Seeds, or then - pixie... Scottish pixies- so that’s where they come from!

Earlier (in the book "Ancient Races of the Earth...") we proposed another hypothesis - the origin of the Picts from the "dwarf tribes of the North" (possibly those same Hobbits of Tolkien!), mentioned by H. P. Blavatsky and Robert Burns, a Scottish poet, in his poem “Heather Honey” - clearly based on local legends... However - now for the readers to judge - a new version of a serious researcher and a disinterested person Farley Mowat, according to which - mythical Scottish Picts- relatives of our ancestors Venedov!..

We currently do not have exact data on the origin Celts- but clearly they came and conquered all of Western Europe before our era. from the Black Sea steppes, from the Caucasus and, perhaps, even from Asia Minor (the legend of Thor!) and Iran. But - a few details:

1.Take those same characteristic short kilt skirts(hence the name!), which indicate southern origin Scots- the northern peoples did not wear these.

2. Celtic dancing, so popular now - it’s a mixture of Bulgarian round dances, Greek sirtaki and Slavic pair dances..

3. Scythian-Sarmatian armor made of metal plates size with a coin- as we already assumed in our book 4, could give rise to the Scots-Irish name for the mysterious mythical creature "leprechaun"- lepra corpan (or lepra cone - our version) - according to Lawrence Gardner, this just comes from “body in scales” or "scales of coins". It is possible that the first Celts who came to the British Isles wearing such chain mail were also strong in magic - and remained in the memory of the local people...

3. Why King Arthur's Round Table so captured the imagination of Europeans? They had absolutely no equality at the table - all the tables were long. Large round tables still lie in barns Ossetian and other residents of the Caucasus - until a special occasion when many guests gather - so that everyone is at such a table on equal terms / according to Val. Sabantion/! And this very ancient custom could have been brought to Britain from these places. Celts(quicker - Sarmatians beginning of AD or earlier).

Bislan Ferkh

Max Muller.

The Secret Doctrine of the North Caucasus is a secret Vedic Teaching that dates back to the times when the people of the Ingush and Chechens were united (this was 300 years ago) and did not know Islam. Paganism mmm turns the tongue to call that high Vedic Teaching, dating back in the Hyperborean Tradition, to those distant times when there was no disintegration into:

· Indo-Aryan with their Vedic Knowledge known to us,

· Slavs with their beliefs (distorted now - see Chapter 2) and

· Celts with their Knowledge of the Druids (however, leading from the Sarmatians and other Iranian-Aryan and Proto-Slavic peoples Black Sea and Caspian regions). We are not talking about the Scandinavian Tradition of the Aesir-Vanir, where the Vanir are clearly the ancestors of the Slavs (they are also vantit Arabs, antes And Wends Southern Europe - see the editorial article above in the collection).

In other words, this Doctrine (we will further call it that for brevity) seems to be the most complete, undistorted fragment of that E

The official history of the Russian state begins in the 9th century AD; early foreign sources mention the Slavs in the 4th-6th centuries AD. Where were the Slavs before? I think this question interests many. I looked at a lot of different material on the Internet on these topics. What's not there? But gradually I developed my own vision of this problem. I tried to summarize the research data of some famous scientists and what I got, in my opinion, is a coherent hypothesis that explains a lot.
Next, I will give verbatim texts from some authors, and then I will draw my conclusions and generalizations.
Let's start with a fairy tale (or maybe it's not a fairy tale?)

1. Hyperborea
(Data from wikipedia)
Hyperborea (ancient Greek Ὑπερβορεία - “beyond Boreas”, “beyond the north”) - in ancient Greek mythology and the tradition that inherits it, the legendary northern country, the habitat of the blessed people of the Hyperboreans.
According to Ferenik, they grew from the blood of the ancient titans. The Hyperboreans are mentioned by Alcaeus in the hymn to Apollo. They were mentioned in the poem “Apollo” by Simius of Rhodes. According to Mnasei, they are now called Delphi.
From time to time, Apollo himself goes to the land of the Hyperboreans in a chariot drawn by swans in order to return to Delphi at the appropriate time of the summer heat. The Hyperboreans, along with the Ethiopians, Phaeacians, and lotivores, are among the peoples close to the gods and loved by them. Just like their patron Apollo, the Hyperboreans are artistically gifted. The blissful life is accompanied by songs, dances, music and feasts among the Hyperboreans; eternal joy and reverent prayers are characteristic of this people - the priests and servants of Apollo. Hercules brought the olive from the Hyperboreans at the source of the Istra to Olympia.
According to Diodorus Siculus, the Hyperboreans incessantly sing of Apollo in their hymns when he appears to them every 19 years. Even death comes to the Hyperboreans as a deliverance from the satiety of life, and they, having experienced all the pleasures, throw themselves into the sea.

A number of legends are associated with the Hyperboreans bringing the first harvest to Delos to Apollo: after the girls sent with gifts did not return from Delos (they remained there or were subjected to violence), the Hyperboreans began to leave gifts on the border of the neighboring country, from where they were gradually transferred by other peoples, all the way to Delos.
The sages and servants of Apollo, Abaris and Aristaeus, who taught the Greeks, were considered to have come from the country of the Hyperboreans. These heroes are considered as a hypostasis of Apollo, since they owned the ancient fetishistic symbols of God (the arrow, raven and laurel of Apollo with their miraculous powers), and also taught and endowed people with new cultural values ​​(music, philosophy, the art of creating poems, hymns, building the Delphic temple).
The ancient Roman scientist Pliny the Elder in his “Natural History” wrote the following about the Hyperboreans:
Behind these (Riphean) mountains, on the other side of Aquilon, a happy people, who are called Hyperboreans, reach very advanced years and are glorified by wonderful legends. They believe that there are loops of the world and the extreme limits of the circulation of the luminaries. The sun shines there for six months, and this is only one day when the sun does not hide (as the ignorant would think) from the spring equinox to the autumn one, the luminaries there rise only once a year at the summer solstice, and set only at the winter solstice. This country is entirely sunny, has a favorable climate and is devoid of any harmful wind. The homes for these residents are groves and forests; the cult of the Gods is carried out by individuals and the whole society; Discord and all sorts of diseases are unknown there. Death comes there only from satiety with life<…>There is no doubt about the existence of this people.
A lot of literature is devoted to Hyperborea, mostly of a parascientific or occult nature. Various authors localize Hyperborea in Greenland, near the Ural Mountains, on the Kola Peninsula, in Karelia, on the Taimyr Peninsula; It has been suggested that Hyperborea was located on a now sunken island (or mainland) of the Arctic Ocean.
There is also a version that the Hyperboreans lived on the Solovetsky Islands, where, according to legend, they still live in an underground city. In pre-war times, the 1930s, on the largest island of the archipelago, Soviet expeditions found a labyrinth of stones, in the center of which there was a passage to a system of underground tunnels. Later, all data obtained during the expeditions was classified. There is a version that, since those expeditions were supervised by Lubyanka, their goal was to find the “Absolute Weapon” that the Hyperboreans owned and from which, apparently, they died.
Many scientists consider the myth of the Hyperboreans to be devoid of a specific historical basis and consider it a special case of utopian ideas about outlying peoples characteristic of various cultures.

Memories of the Golden Age
(from ancient Indian Vedas)
A fairly concentrated memory of the Golden Age in the north of Eurasia also developed in ancient Indian mythology. The details about the magical Land of Happiness never ceased to amaze listeners of oral traditions, where “there was no illness, no deception, no envy, no crying, no pride, no cruelty, no quarrels and negligence, enmity, resentment, fear, suffering, anger and jealousy." The land of abundance and happiness is clearly connected in the minds of the ancestors of the Indians with the Polar Mountain Meru - the abode of the first creator Brahma and the original place of residence of other Indian gods. This is how the blessed polar ancestral home and the Golden Age reigning there are described in the 3rd book of the Mahabharata:
"The golden mountain Meru, the queen of the mountains (is spread over thirty-three thousand yojanas). Here (are located) the gardens of the Gods - Nandana and other blessed places of rest for the righteous. There is no hunger, no thirst, no fatigue, no fear of cold or heat, there is no "There is nothing unwholesome or something that causes disgust, there are no diseases. Everywhere there wafts delicate aromas, every touch is pleasant. From everywhere there flow sounds that enchant the soul and ear. There is no sadness, no old age, no worries, no suffering."

Let's draw three conclusions from this (don't laugh just yet):
A) There is a version that the Hyperboreans owned the “Absolute Weapon” and from which, apparently, they died.
B) If they owned absolute weapons, then they had a developed civilization.
C) In the minds of the ancestors of the Indians, they clearly associated their gods with Hyperborean.
Just imagine, what if something like this actually happened? After all, many things that were considered myths turned out to be real events (Troy and much more)

Well, okay, let's finish with fairy tales for now, let's move on to science.

2. Anatoly Alekseevich Klyosov (born 1946). For 12 years he has been a professor of biochemistry at Harvard University (Center for Biochemistry, Biophysics and Medicine at Harvard Medical School). Since DNA was deciphered in the 90s, it has become possible, for example, to determine paternity using the Y chromosome. But in this case, you can dig deeper. And they started digging, mainly abroad. In Russia, I only know Klyosov, who is engaged in DNA research, and he lives abroad. Below I will give you excerpts from his article:

“Make yourself comfortable, dear reader. Some shocks await you. It’s not very easy to start a story with what the author expects from his research into the effect of a bomb exploding, but what to do if this happens?
But, in fact, why such confidence? Nowadays, nothing can surprise you anymore, right?
Yes, that's how it is. But when the issue is at least three hundred years old, and the conviction has gradually formed that the issue has no solution, at least by “available means,” and suddenly a solution is found, then this, you see, is not such a common occurrence. And this question is “The origin of the Slavs.” Or - “The origin of the original Slavic community.” Or, if you prefer, “The search for the Indo-European ancestral home.”
In fact, over these three hundred years, all sorts of assumptions have not been made on this matter. Probably everything that is possible. The problem is that no one knew which ones were correct. The question was extremely confusing. Therefore, the author will not be surprised if, in response to his findings and conclusions, a chorus of voices is heard - “that’s how it was known,” “they wrote about this before.” This is human nature. And ask this choir now - well, where is the ancestral home of the Slavs? Where is the ancestral home of the “Indo-Europeans”? Where did they come from? So there will no longer be a chorus, but a discord - “the question is complex and confusing, there is no answer.”
But first, a few definitions to make it clear what we are talking about.

DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS. HISTORY OF THE ISSUE

By Slavs, in the context of their origin, I will mean the Proto-Slavs. And, as will be seen from the subsequent presentation, this context is inextricably linked with the “Indo-Europeans”. The latter is a terribly awkward term. The word “Indo-Europeans” is simply a mockery of common sense. In fact, there is an “Indo-European group of languages”, and the history of this issue is that two centuries ago certain similarities were discovered between Sanskrit and many European languages. This group of languages ​​was called “Indo-European”; it includes almost all European languages, except Basque, Finno-Ugric and Turkic languages. Then they didn’t know the reasons why India and Europe suddenly found themselves in the same language bundle, and even now they don’t really know. This will also be discussed below, and it would not have happened without the Proto-Slavs.
But the absurdities began to develop when the speakers of “Indo-European languages” themselves began to be called “Indo-Europeans”. That is, a Latvian and a Lithuanian are Indo-Europeans, but an Estonian is not. And the Hungarian is not Indo-European. A Russian living in Finland and speaking Finnish is not an Indo-European, but when he switches to Russian, he immediately becomes an Indo-European.
In other words, the language, linguistic category was transferred to the ethnic, even essentially genealogical. Apparently, they thought that there was no better choice. It might not have been then. Now there is. Although, strictly speaking, these are linguistic terms, and when linguists say one thing, they mean another, and others get confused.
There is no less confusion when we return to ancient times. Who are the "Indo-Europeans"? These are those who in ancient times spoke “Indo-European” languages. And even earlier, who were they? And they were “Proto-Indo-Europeans”. This term is even more unfortunate, and is akin to calling the ancient Anglo-Saxons “proto-Americans.” They have never even seen India, and that language has not yet been formed; only after millennia will it be transformed and join the Indo-European group, and they are already “Proto-Indo-Europeans”. It’s like calling Prince Vladimir “proto-Soviet.” Although “Indo-” is also a linguistic term, and among philologists it has no direct relation to India.
On the other hand, you can understand and sympathize. Well, there was no other term for “Indo-Europeans”. There was no name for the people who in those distant times formed a cultural connection with India, and expanded this cultural, and in any case, linguistic connection throughout Europe.
Wait a minute, how did this not happen? And the arias?
But more on this a little later.
More about terms. For some reason, it is acceptable to talk about the ancient Germans or Scandinavians, but not about the ancient Slavs. It immediately rings out: no, no, there were no ancient Slavs. Although it should be clear to everyone that we are talking about the Proto-Slavs. What kind of double standard is this? Let's agree - when speaking about the Slavs, I do not mean the modern “ethno-cultural community,” but our ancestors who lived thousands of years ago. Should they have some kind of name? Not awkward “proto-Indo-Europeans”? And not “Indo-Iranians”, right? Let there be Slavs, proto-Slavs. And arias, but more on that later.
Now – which Slavs are we talking about? Traditionally, the Slavs are divided into three groups - Eastern, Western and Southern Slavs. Eastern Slavs are Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians. Western Slavs - Poles, Czechs, Slovaks. Southern Slavs are Serbs, Croats, Bosnians, Macedonians, Bulgarians, Slovenes. This is not an exhaustive list, you can remember the Sorbs (Lusatian Slavs), and others, but the idea is clear. Actually, this division is largely based on linguistic criteria, according to which the Slavic group of Indo-European languages ​​consists of eastern, western and southern subgroups, with approximately the same division by country.
In this context, the Slavs are “ethno-cultural communities,” which includes languages. In this form, they are believed to have formed by the 6-7 centuries AD. And the Slavic languages, according to linguists, diverged about 1300 years ago, again around the 7th century. But the genealogically listed Slavs belong to completely different clans, and the history of these clans is completely different.
Therefore, Western and Eastern Slavs as “ethno-cultural communities” are somewhat different concepts. Some are mostly Catholics, others are Orthodox. The language is noticeably different, and there are other “ethno-cultural” differences. And within the framework of DNA genealogy, this is one and the same thing, one genus, the same mark on the Y chromosome, the same migration history, the same common ancestor. The same ancestral haplogroup, finally.
So we have come to the concept of “ancestral haplogroup”, or “genus haplogroup”. It is determined by marks, or the pattern of mutations, on the male sex chromosome. Women also have them, but in a different coordinate system. So, the Eastern Slavs are the genus R1a1. Their number among residents of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus ranges from 45 to 70%. And in ancient Russian and Ukrainian cities, towns, villages - up to 80%.
Conclusion - the term “Slavs” depends on the context. In linguistics, “Slavs” are one thing, in ethnography – another, in DNA genealogy – a third. A haplogroup, a genus, was formed when there were no nations, no churches, no modern languages. In this regard, belonging to a genus, to a haplogroup, is primary.

Since membership in a haplogroup is determined by very specific mutations in certain nucleotides of the Y chromosome, we can say that each of us carries a certain mark in our DNA. And this mark in male offspring is indestructible; it can only be exterminated along with the offspring itself. Unfortunately, there have been plenty of such cases in the past. But this does not mean at all that this mark is an indicator of a certain “breed” of a person. This label is not associated with genes and has nothing to do with them, but it is genes and only genes that can be associated with a “breed” if desired. Haplogroups and haplotypes do not in any way determine the shape of the skull or nose, hair color, or physical or mental characteristics of a person. But they forever tie the carrier of the haplotype to a specific human race, at the beginning of which there was a patriarch of the family, whose offspring survived and live today, unlike millions of other broken genealogical lines.
This mark in our DNA turns out to be invaluable for historians, linguists, and anthropologists, because this mark is not “assimilated”, as carriers of languages, genes, and carriers of different cultures are assimilated and “dissolved” in the population. Haplotypes and haplogroups do not “dissolve” or assimilate. No matter what religion the descendants change over the millennia, no matter what language they acquire, no matter what cultural and ethnic characteristics they change, exactly the same haplogroup, the same haplotype (except with a few mutations) stubbornly appear upon appropriate testing of certain fragments of the Y chromosome . It doesn't matter if he is a Muslim, a Christian, a Jew, a Buddhist, an atheist or a pagan.
As will be shown in this study, members of the R1a1 genus in the Balkans, who lived there 12 thousand years ago, after more than two hundred generations reached the East European Plain, where the ancestor of modern Russians and Ukrainians of the R1a1 genus appeared 4900 ± 300 years ago, including the author of this article. Another nine hundred years, 4000 years ago, they, the Proto-Slavs, reached the southern Urals, and four hundred years later they went to India, where approximately 100 million of their descendants, members of the same genus R1a1, now live. The Aryan family. Aryans, because they called themselves that, and this is recorded in the ancient Indian Vedas and Iranian legends. They are the descendants of the Proto-Slavs or their closest relatives. There was and is no “assimilation” of the R1a1 haplogroup, and the haplotypes are almost the same and are easily identified. Identical to Slavic. Another wave of Aryans, with the same haplotypes, traveled from Central Asia to Eastern Iran, also in the 3rd millennium BC, and became the Iranian Aryans.
Finally, another wave of representatives of the R1a1 genus went south and reached the Arabian Peninsula, the Gulf of Oman, where Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates are now located, and the Arabs there, having received the results of DNA testing, look with amazement at the test certificate with the R1a1 haplotype and haplogroup . Aryan, Proto-Slavic, “Indo-European” - call it what you want, but the essence is the same. And these certificates determine the boundaries of the area of ​​​​the campaigns of the ancient Aryans. The calculations below show that the times of these campaigns in Arabia are 4 thousand years ago.
So, when we say “Slavs,” in this study we will mean the Eastern Slavs, people from the R1a1 genus, in terms of DNA genealogy. Until very recently, science did not know how to define them in “scientific terms.” What objective, measurable parameter unites them? Actually, the question was not posed that way. According to a huge amount of data accumulated by linguistics, comparative analysis of languages, these are certain “Indo-Europeans”, “Aryans”, newcomers from the north (to India and Iran), they know snow, cold weather, they are familiar with birch, ash, beech, they are familiar with wolves, bears , the horse is familiar. It has now become known that these are people of the R1a1 genus, to which up to 70% of the population of modern Russia belong. And further to the west, to the Atlantic, the share of the Aryan, Slavic gens R1a1 is steadily falling, and among the inhabitants of the British Isles it is only 2-4%.

This issue has been resolved. And who are the “Indo-Europeans” then?

From the above it inevitably follows that “Indo-Europeans” are the ancient genus R1a1. Arias. Then everything, or at least a lot, falls into place - with the arrival of people of this kind in India and Iran, and the spread of people of the same kind throughout Europe, and hence the emergence of the Indo-European group of languages, since this is actually theirs, the Aryan language, or its dialects, and the emergence of “Iranian languages” of the Indo-European group, since these are the Aryan languages. Moreover, as we will see below, “Iranian languages” appeared after the arrival of the Aryans in Iran, or more precisely, not “after”, but became the result of the arrival of the Aryans there, in the 2nd millennium BC.

How do modern sciences now look at the “Indo-Europeans”? “Indo-Europeans” for them are like a heffalump. “Indo-Europeans”, in modern linguistics and a little in archeology, are ancient (as a rule) people who then (!), after thousands of years (!), came to India, and somehow made it so that Sanskrit, the literary Indian language, found itself in the same linguistic connection with the main European languages, except for Basque and Finno-Ugric languages. And besides Turkic and Semitic, which do not belong to the Indo-European languages. How they, the Europeans, did this, how and where they came from in India and Iran - linguists and archaeologists do not explain. Moreover, those who did not come to India and did not seem to have anything to do with Sanskrit, but apparently spread the language, are also included in the “Indo-Europeans”. Celts, for example. But at the same time they argue about who was Indo-European and who was not. The criteria used are very different, up to the shape of the dishes and the nature of the patterns on it.

Another complication is that since many Iranian languages ​​also belong to Indo-European languages, and many also do not understand why, they often say “Indo-Iranian” instead of “Indo-European”. To make matters worse, “Indo-Europeans” are often called “Indo-Iranians.” And monstrous constructions appear that, for example, “Indo-Iranians lived on the Dnieper in ancient times.” This must mean that those who lived on the Dnieper produced descendants over thousands of years who came to India and Iran, and somehow made the languages ​​of India and Iran become to a certain extent close to many European languages ​​- English, French, Spanish , Russian, Greek, and many others. Therefore, those ancients who lived on the Dnieper thousands of years before were “Indo-Iranians”. You can go crazy! Moreover, they spoke “Iranian languages”! This is despite the fact that the “Indo-European” ancient Iranian languages ​​appeared in the 2nd millennium BC, and those on the Dnieper lived 4000-5000 years ago. And they spoke a language that would appear only after hundreds, or even thousands of years.

They spoke Aryan, dear reader. But it’s simply scary to mention this among linguists. They don't even mention it. They don't do that. Apparently, no command or order was received. And we ourselves are afraid.

Who are the “Proto-Indo-Europeans”? And this is like a proto-heffalump. These, therefore, are those who were the ancestors of those who were the ancestors of those who, after thousands of years, came to India and Iran, and did so... well, and so on.

This is how linguists imagine it. There was a certain “Nostratic language”, a very long time ago. It is placed from 23 thousand to 8 thousand years ago, some in India, some in Central Europe, some in the Balkans. Not long ago, it was estimated in the English-language literature that scholarly sources had proposed 14 different “ancestral homelands” for “Indo-Europeans” and “Proto-Indo-Europeans.” V.A. Safronov in the fundamental book “Indo-European ancestral homelands” counted 25 of them - seven in Asia and 18 in Europe. This “Nostratic” language (or languages), which was spoken by the “Proto-Indo-Europeans”, about 8-10 thousand years ago split into “Indo-European” languages, and other non-Indo-European ones (Semitic, Finno-Ugric, Turkic). And the “Indo-Europeans”, therefore, developed their own languages. True, they came to India after many millennia, but they are still “Indo-Europeans”.

We sorted this out too. Linguists, however, have not figured it out yet. They note - “although the origin of Indo-European languages ​​has been studied most intensively compared to others, it continues to be the most difficult and persistent problem of historical linguistics... Despite more than 200 years of history of the issue, experts have not been able to determine the time and place of Indo-European languages. of European origin."

Here again the question of the ancestral home arises. Namely, three ancestral homelands - the ancestral home of the “Proto-Indo-Europeans”, the ancestral home of the “Indo-Europeans”, and the ancestral home of the Slavs. It’s bad with the ancestral home of the “proto”, because it’s bad with the ancestral home of the “Indo-Europeans”. Currently, three are more or less seriously considered as candidates for the ancestral homeland of the “Indo-Europeans” or “Proto-Indo-Europeans”. One option is Western Asia, or, more specifically, Turkish Anatolia, or, even more specifically, the area between lakes Van and Urmia, just south of the borders of the former USSR, in western Iran, also known as western Azerbaijan. The second option is the southern steppes of modern Ukraine-Russia, in the places of the so-called “Kurgan culture”. The third option is eastern or central Europe, or more specifically the Danube Valley, or the Balkans, or the northern Alps.

The time of spread of the “Indo-European” or “Proto-Indo-European” language also remains uncertain, and varies from 4500-6000 years ago, if we take representatives of the Kurgan culture as its speakers, to 8000-10000 years ago, if its speakers are the then inhabitants of Anatolia. Or even earlier. Proponents of the "Anatolian theory" believe that the main argument in its favor is that the spread of agriculture across Europe, North Africa and Asia began from Anatolia between 8,000 and 9,500 years ago, and reached the British Isles approximately 5,500 years ago. Proponents of the “Balkan theory” use the same arguments about the spread of agriculture, albeit from the Balkans towards Anatolia.

This issue has not been resolved to this day. There are many arguments for and against each of the three options.

The same applies to the ancestral home of the Slavs. Since no one has yet connected the Slavs (Proto-Slavs), Aryans, and Indo-Europeans, much less put a sign of identity between all three, the ancestral homeland of the Slavs is a separate and also unresolved question. This issue has been discussed in science for more than three hundred years, but there is no agreement, even minimal. It is generally accepted that the Slavs entered the historical arena only in the 6th century AD. But these are new times. And we are interested in the ancient Slavs, or Proto-Slavs, say, three thousand years ago and earlier. And this is generally bad.

Some believe that the “ancestral home of the Slavs” was located in the region of Pripyat and the Middle Dnieper. Others believe that the “ancestral home of the Slavs” was the territory from the Dnieper to the Western Bug, which the Slavs occupied two to three thousand years ago. And where the Slavs were before, and whether they were there at all, is considered a question “unsolvable at this stage.” Still others suggest that the ancestral home of the Slavs, like the “Indo-Europeans” in general, was the steppes of the south of what is now Russia and Ukraine, but still others indignantly reject this. Still others believe that the ancestral homeland of the “Indo-Europeans” and the ancestral homeland of the Slavs must still coincide, because the Slavic languages ​​are very archaic and ancient. Others correct that it is not “Indo-Europeans”, but one of their large groups, thereby hinting that “Indo-Europeans” must be different. Which ones are usually not explained.

From time to time, a certain “Indo-Iranian community” is mentioned, which for some reason spoke a “Balto-Slavic proto-language.” This is already starting to make my head spin. Sometimes some “Black Sea Indo-Aryans” appear. Why they are suddenly “Indo” in the Black Sea region is not explained. Linguists say that this is customary.

They attract anthropology, and they say that the Slavs in this regard are close to the alpine zone - modern Hungary, Austria, Switzerland, Northern Italy, Southern Germany, the northern Balkans, which means that the Proto-Slavs moved from west to east, and not vice versa. But anthropologists and archaeologists cannot indicate the time of this movement, since the Slavs usually burned corpses rather than burying them, which deprived scientists of material for two and a half millennia. Some believe that the settlement of the Proto-Slavs across the territory of Eastern Ukraine is associated with the spread of the Kurgan archaeological culture, and therefore from east to west. It is almost unanimously believed that the population of the Andronovo culture was “Indo-Iranian” in its linguistic affiliation, that “Indo-Aryans” lived in the Southern Urals, in Arkaim, and it was again created by “Indo-Iranians”. There are expressions “Indo-Iranian tribes on the way to resettlement to India.” That is, they were already “Indo-Iranian,” although they had not yet moved there. That is, anything, even to the point of absurdity, just so as not to use the word “arias”.

Finally, the “pseudo-scientific” literature goes to the other extreme, and claims that “the Russian Slavs were the ancestors of almost all European and part of Asian peoples,” and “from 60% to 80% of the British, northern and eastern Germans, Swedes, Danes, Norwegians , Icelanders, 80% of Austrians, Lithuanians are assimilated Slavs, Slavic-Russians.”

The situation is approximately clear. You can move on to the essence of my presentation. Moreover, the most “advanced” historical and linguistic scientific articles, recognizing that the question of the place and time of the emergence of the “Indo-European” language remains unresolved, call for going beyond archeology and linguistics and using “independent data” to resolve the issue, which will allow us to look at problem from the other side, and make a choice between the main theories.

Which is what I do in the research presented here.

DNA genealogy in general, and Slavs in particular

I have repeatedly described the essence of DNA genealogy and its main provisions before (http://www.lebed.com/2006/art4606.htm, ,). This time I will get straight to the point, recalling only that in the DNA of every man, namely in his Y-chromosome, there are certain areas in which mutations gradually, every few generations, accumulate in nucleotides over and over again. This has nothing to do with genes. And in general, only 2% of DNA consists of genes, and the male sex Y chromosome is even less, there are only a tiny fraction of a percent of genes there.

The Y chromosome is the only one of all 46 chromosomes (more precisely, of the 23 carried by the sperm) that is transmitted from father to son, and then to each successive son along a chain of times tens of thousands of years long. The son receives the Y chromosome from his father exactly the same as he received from his father, plus new mutations, if any occurred during transmission from father to son. And this happens rarely.

How rare?

Here's an example. This is my 25-marker Slavic haplotype, genus R1a1:

Each number is a specific sequence of nucleotide blocks in the Y chromosome of DNA. It's called an allele, and it shows how many times this block is repeated in DNA. Mutations in such a haplotype (that is, a random change in the number of nucleotide blocks) occur at a rate of one mutation approximately every 22 generations, that is, on average once every 550 years. No one knows which allele will change next, and it is impossible to predict. Statistics. In other words, here we can only talk about the probabilities of these changes.

In my earlier stories about DNA genealogy, I gave examples on so-called 6-marker haplotypes, small ones, for simplicity. Or also called “bikini haplotypes”. But to search for the ancestral home of the Slavs, a much more accurate tool is needed. Therefore, in this study we will use 25-marker haplotypes. Since any man has 50 million nucleotides on his Y-chromosome, the haplotype with its numbers can, in principle, be made as long as desired, it’s just a matter of the technique for determining the nucleotide sequences. Haplotypes are defined to a maximum length of 67 markers, although technically there is no limit. But even 25-marker haplotypes are a very fine resolution; such haplotypes are not even considered in scientific articles. This is probably the first one.

Haplotypes are extremely sensitive to origin when talking about genealogical lineages. Let’s take not the Slavic R1a1, but, say, the Finno-Ugric clan, N3 in the DNA genealogy system. A typical 25-marker haplotype of this genus looks like this:

14 24 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 17 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 30 12 12 14 14

It has 29 mutations compared to the Slavic one above! This corresponds to a difference of more than two thousand generations, that is, the Slavic and Finno-Ugric ancestor lived more than 30 thousand years ago.

The same picture emerges if we compare, for example, with Jews. A typical Middle Eastern Jewish haplotype (genus J1) is:

12 23 14 10 13 15 11 16 12 13 11 30 17 8 9 11 11 26 14 21 27 12 14 16 17

It has 32 mutations in relation to Slavic. Even further than the Finno-Ugric. And they differ from each other by 35 mutations.

In general, the idea is clear. Haplotypes are very sensitive when compared across genera. They reflect completely different histories of the clan, origin, and migration of clans. Why are there Finno-Ugric people or Jews? Let's take the Bulgarians, brothers. Up to half of them have variations of this haplotype (genus I2):

13 24 16 11 14 15 11 13 13 13 11 31 17 8 10 11 11 25 15 20 32 12 14 15 15

It has 21 mutations in relation to the above East Slavic haplotype. That is, they are both Slavic, but the gender is different. Genus I2 descended from a different ancestor; the migration routes of genus I2 were completely different from R1a1. It was later, already in our era or at the end of the last, that they met and formed a Slavic cultural-ethnic community, and then they combined writing and religion. And the clan is mostly different, although 12% of Bulgarians are of the East Slavic, R1a1 clan.

It is very important that by the number of mutations in haplotypes we can calculate when the common ancestor of the group of people whose haplotypes we are considering lived. I will not dwell here on exactly how the calculations are carried out, since all this was recently published in the scientific press (link is at the end of the article). The bottom line is that the more mutations in the haplotypes of a group of people, the more ancient their common ancestor. And since mutations occur completely statistically, randomly, with a certain average speed, the life time of the common ancestor of a group of people belonging to the same genus is calculated quite reliably. Examples will be given below.

To make it clearer, I will give a simple analogy. The haplotype tree is a pyramid standing at the top. The top at the bottom is the haplotype of the common ancestor of the genus. The base of the pyramid, at the very top, is us, our contemporaries, these are our haplotypes. The number of mutations in each haplotype is a measure of the distance from the common ancestor, from the top of the pyramid, to us, our contemporaries. If the pyramid were ideal, three points, that is, three haplotypes at the base would be enough to calculate the distance to the top. But in reality, three points are not enough. Experience shows that a dozen 25-marker haplotypes (meaning 250 points) are enough for a good estimate of the time to a common ancestor.

25-marker haplotypes of Russians and Ukrainians of the genus R1a1 were obtained from the international YSearch database. The carriers of these haplotypes are our contemporaries, living from the Far East to western Ukraine, and from the northern to southern outskirts. And in this way it was calculated that the common ancestor of the Russian and Ukrainian Eastern Slavs, genus R1a1, lived 4500 years ago. This figure is reliable, it has been verified by cross-calculation using haplotypes of different lengths. And, as we will now see, this figure is not accidental. Let me remind you again that the details of calculations, verification and double-checking are given in the article given at the end. And these calculations were carried out using 25 marker haplotypes. This is already the highest level of DNA genealogy, if you call a spade a spade.

It turned out that the common Proto-Slavic ancestor, who lived 4500 years ago, had the following haplotype in his DNA:

For comparison, here is my haplotype:

13 24 16 11 11 15 12 12 10 13 11 30 16 9 10 11 11 24 14 20 34 15 15 16 16

Compared to my Proto-Slavic ancestor, I have 10 mutations (highlighted in bold). If we remember that mutations occur once every 550 years, then I am separated from my ancestor by 5,500 years. But we are talking about statistics, and for everyone the circle turns out to be 4500 years. I got more mutations, someone else got fewer. In other words, each of us has our own individual mutations, but we all have the same ancestor haplotype. And, as we will see, it remains this way throughout almost all of Europe.

So let's take a breath. Our common Proto-Slavic ancestor lived on the territory of modern Russia-Ukraine 4900±300 years ago. The Early Bronze Age, or even the Chalcolithic, is the transition from the Stone Age to the Bronze Age. To imagine the scale of time, this is much earlier than the exodus of the Jews from Egypt, according to biblical legends. And they came out, if you follow the interpretations of the Torah, 3500-3600 years ago. If we ignore the interpretation of the Torah, which, of course, is not a strict scientific source, then we can note that the common ancestor of the Eastern Slavs, in this case Russian and Ukrainian, lived a thousand years before the eruption of the Santorini (Thera) volcano, which destroyed the Minoan civilization on the island Crete.

Now we can begin to build a sequence of events in our ancient history. 4900±300 years ago, the Proto-Slavs appeared on the Central Russian Upland, and not just any Proto-Slavs, but precisely those whose descendants live in our time, numbering tens of millions of people. 3800 years ago, the Aryans, descendants of those Proto-Slavs (and having an identical ancestral haplotype, as will be shown below), built the settlement of Arkaim (its current name), Sintashta and the “country of cities” in the Southern Urals. 3600 years ago the Arkaim left Arkaim and moved to India. Indeed, according to archaeologists, the settlement, which is now called Arkaim, lasted only 200 years.

Stop! Where did we get the idea that these were the descendants of our ancestors, the Proto-Slavs?

How from? And R1a1, the gender mark? This mark accompanies all the haplotypes given above. This means that it can be used to determine to what clan those who went to India belonged.

By the way, here's some more data. In recent work, German scientists identified nine fossil haplotypes from southern Siberia, and it turned out that eight of them belong to the genus R1a1, and one is a Mongoloid, genus C. The dating is between 5500 and 1800 years ago. Haplotypes of the genus R1a1, for example, are like this:

13 25 16 11 11 14 X Y Z 14 11 32

Here the undeciphered markers are replaced with letters. They are very similar to the Slavic haplotypes given above, especially when you consider that these ancient ones also carry individual, random mutations.

Currently, the share of Slavic-Aryans of haplogroup R1a1 in Lithuania is 38%, in Latvia 41%, and Belarus 40%, in Ukraine from 45% to 54%. In Russia, the Slavic-Aryan population is on average 48%, due to the high proportion of Finno-Ugric people in the north of Russia, but in the south and center of Russia the proportion of Eastern Slavic-Aryans reaches 60-75% and higher.

Haplotypes of Indians and the lifespan of their common ancestor

Let me make a reservation right away - I deliberately write “Indians” and not “Indians”, because the majority of Indians are aborigines, Dravidians, especially Indians in the south of India. And the Hindus, for the most part, are carriers of the R1a1 haplogroup. To write “haplotypes of Indians” would be incorrect, since Indians as a whole belong to a wide variety of DNA genealogies.

In this sense, the expression “haplotypes of the Indians” is similar to the expression “haplotypes of the Slavs”. It reflects the “ethno-cultural” component, but this is one of the characteristics of the genus.

In my early work about the haplotypes of the Slavs and Indians (), I already wrote that they, the Slavs and the Hindus, had the same common ancestor. Both of them in large numbers belong to the R1a1 genus, only among Russians there are 50-75%, among Indians - 16%. That is, there are 40-60 million Russian men from the R1a1 genus, 100 million among Indians. But in that work I described only the type of haplotypes, and short ones at that. Now, a year later, we can already determine when the common ancestors of the Eastern Slavs and Indians lived.

Here is the ancestral haplotype of Hindus of the same genus, R1a1.

13 25 16 11 11 14 12 12 10 13 11 31 15 9 10 11 11 24 14 20 32 12 15 15 16

Almost exactly the same as the haplotype of the first ancestor of the Slavs. Two mutations have been identified, but in fact there are no mutations there. The fourth number on the left for the Slavs is 10.46, therefore rounded to 10, and for the Indians it is 10.53, rounded to 11. In fact, it is the same. The same goes for the average mutation, a fraction of one.

The age of the common ancestor of the Hindus is 3850 years. 650 years younger than the Slavs.

Since the ancestral haplotypes of the Hindus and Slavs are almost the same, and the Slavic haplotype is 650 years older, it is clear that it was the proto-Slavs who came to India, and not vice versa. Strictly speaking, these were not Proto-Slavs, but Proto-Indians, but they were descendants of the Proto-Slavs.

If you add up all the haplotypes of the Slavs and Indians, since they are presumably from the same ancestor, then the differences disappear altogether. Common ancestral haplotype of Slavs and Indians:

13 25 16 10 11 14 12 12 10 13 11 30 15 9 10 11 11 24 14 20 32 12 15 15 16

It is identical to the haplotype of the common ancestor of the Slavs. The life span of the common ancestor of the Slavs and Indians was 4300 years ago. The ancestor is Proto-Slavic, he is older. In 500 years, the Proto-Slavic Aryans will stand in Arkaim, in another 200 years they will go to India, and the Hindus will begin counting down from their common ancestor, again the Proto-Slavic, 3850 years ago. Everything fits together.

Currently, the proportion of Indians of the Aryan gens, R1a1, throughout the country is 16%, second only to the most common Indian “aboriginal” haplogroup H1 (20%). And in the higher castes, haplogroup R1a occupies almost half. Let's look at this in a little more detail.

As you know, society in India is divided into castes and tribes. The four main castes, or “varnas,” are Brahmins (priests), Kshatriyas (warriors), Vaishyas (merchants, farmers, herders), and Shudras (workers and servants). In the scientific literature they are divided into “Indo-European” and “Dravidian” castes, each of which has three levels - high caste, middle and low. The tribes are divided into Indo-European, Dravidian, Burma-Tibetan and Australasian. As was recently determined, this entire male population in India can be divided into a dozen to one and a half main haplogroups - Mongoloid C, Iranian-Caucasian G, Indian H, L, and R2 (which are extremely rare in the world except India), Middle Eastern J1, Mediterranean (and Middle Eastern) J2, East Asian O, Siberian Q, Eastern European (Aryan) R1a1, Western European (and Asian) R1b. By the way, European gypsies, as is known, came from India 500-800 years ago, the overwhelming majority have haplogroups H1 and R2.

The bulk of both higher castes, Indo-European and Dravidian, consists of representatives of the Aryan haplogroup R1a1. They are 45% in the Indo-European high caste, and 29% in the Dravidian high caste. The remaining members of the higher castes are carriers of Indian haplogroups R2 (16% and 10%, respectively), L (5% and 17%), H (12% and 7%), the rest - a few percent.

In the tribes, on the contrary, the East Asian haplogroup O predominates (53% among Australasian, 66% among Burma-Tibetan and 29% among “Indo-European” tribes), and the “aboriginal” Indian H (37% among Dravidian tribes).

In principle, this is consistent with the ancient migration flows outlined below. The most ancient flow, 40-25 thousand years ago, to the east from Northern Mesopotamia - Western Iran, splitting at the Pamir-Hindu Kush-Tien Shan, brought the future Dravidians, East Asians and Australasians south to India, and the future Siberians, West Asians and Europeans - to the north and west. After many millennia, the second wave of Dravidians came to India from the Middle East, bringing with them the skills of emerging agriculture, along with haplogroup J2, which is most abundant in the highest caste of Dravidians - 15% (in the highest caste of Indo-Europeans - 9%). And finally, 3500 years ago, carriers of haplogroup R1a1 arrived in India from the southern Urals under the name Aryans. Under it they entered the Indian epic. Interestingly, the Indian caste system itself was created approximately the same 3,500 years ago.

So let's repeat it again. The Slavs and Indians have one common ancestor of the genus R1a1, who lived 4300 years ago, and the ancestor of the Slavs themselves, with the same haplotype, lived a little earlier, 4900±300 years ago. His descendant, 1050 years later, began the genealogical line of the Hindus, starting from 3850 years ago (this is the lifetime of the common ancestor of the Hindus, see above), just from the time of the beginning of Arkaim. R1a1 - these were the Aryans who came to India. And when they came, and what brought them there, I will tell you below, but before that, let’s see when the common ancestors of the R1a1 genus lived throughout Europe. Then we will create an overall picture of where they lived before everyone else, that is, where their ancestral home was, and where and when they moved from their ancestral home. We can rightfully call them Aryans, instead of the faceless R1a1, and even more so instead of the awkward “Indo-Europeans” or “Proto-Indo-Europeans”. They are arias, dear reader, arias. And there was nothing “Indo-Iranian” about them, until, of course, they came to India and Iran. And they did not receive their language from India or Iran, but on the contrary, they brought their own there. Aryan. Proto-Slavic. Sanskrit. Or proto-Sanskrit, if you like.

About the Slavs, Proto-Slavs, Aryans and “Iranian-speaking Indo-Europeans.” Why is the word “arias” so scary for some?

We look at the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. We read:

“The only justified and currently accepted in science is the use of the term “Aryans” only in relation to tribes and peoples who spoke Indo-Iranian languages.”

This is necessary - so dashingly and directively to disown one’s ancestors.

In fact, it was our Aryan ancestors who brought the language to Iran, and thousands of years later, in our time, it began to be considered Iranian. And since there is a large school of Iranian languages, the Aryan languages ​​began to be mistaken for Iranian, confusing cause with effect.

Iranian languages ​​belong to the Indo-European languages, and their dating is as follows - the most ancient, from the 2nd millennium BC. up to 300-400 years BC, average - from 300-400 years BC. up to 800-900 years AD, and the new one – 800-900 years AD. until now. That is, the oldest Iranian languages ​​date back to AFTER the departure of the Aryans to India and Iran, and more than 1000 years AFTER the life of the Proto-Slavic ancestor (4500 years ago). He, our ancestor, could not speak Iranian. He spoke Aryan, and his descendants brought the Aryan language to Iran a thousand and a half years later. And the Western Iranian group of languages ​​generally appeared around 500 BC.

So, through the efforts of our scientists, the Aryans and Proto-Slavs became faceless “Indo-Europeans”, and the Aryan, ancient Slavic languages ​​became “Indo-Iranian”. This is also politically correct. And there were absolutely fantastic passages, accepted in scientific literature, that “Iranian-speaking tribes lived on the Dnieper,” that “the Scythians were Iranian-speaking,” that “the inhabitants of Arkaim spoke Iranian languages.”

They spoke Aryan, dear reader, Aryan. They are ancient Slavic languages. And this is also our story.

According to the Indian Vedas, it was the Aryans who came to India from the north, and it was their hymns and tales that formed the basis of the Indian Vedas. And, continuing further, it is the Russian language (and related Baltic languages, for example, Lithuanian) that is closest to Sanskrit, and from Russian and the Baltic languages ​​it’s a stone’s throw to Europe. Therefore, the Balto-Slavic languages ​​are the basis of the “Indo-European languages”, right? That is, they are also Aryan languages, if you call a spade a spade.

So, no one argues. But, you know, it’s somehow wrong to give such an honor to the Slavs. “Indo-European languages” are politically correct, some faceless “Indo-Europeans” are even more politically correct, Slavs are not very politically correct. And arias – this, you know, is fraught.

Why is it dangerous?

And here is how the Great Soviet Encyclopedia defines it: “Already from the mid-19th century. the concept of “Aryans” (or “Aryans”) was used to define the peoples who belonged to the Indo-European linguistic community. This use of the term was developed in racist literature (especially in Nazi Germany), which gave it a tendentious and anti-scientific meaning.”

Well, there was nothing racist in the way we calculated the data on the life times of the Aryans above. Therefore, we will not drag Nazi Germany here. And why is it fraught?

And the arias, you know, are kind of scary. Citizens knew this during the times of the GUGB NKVD of the USSR, and especially the employees of this organization. At that time, there was a development by the Secret Political Department (SPO) called “Aryans,” which linked this word with accusations of the creation and propaganda of fascist organizations in the USSR. According to sources of that time, the main accusations were brought against representatives of the Soviet intelligentsia - teachers of higher and secondary educational institutions, literary workers of publishing houses. In particular, a group of employees producing foreign dictionaries was arrested and convicted in the “Aryan case”. In general, a lot can be said about this. As Doctor of Historical Sciences A. Burovsky notes, “try to talk about arias in the professional community - and respected colleagues will instantly tense up, tighten up... This is a dubious topic, not good. It’s better not to deal with this topic at all, calm down. And if you’ve already started doing it, then there’s no need to draw any conclusions.”

But we will do it, and not alone.

So, it became clear that the genus R1a1 in DNA genealogy is the Aryans, they are our ancestors, the Proto-Slavs, they are also “Indo-Europeans”. They brought their Aryan language, also known as Proto-Slavic, to India and Iran 3500-3400 years ago, that is, 1400-1500 BC. In India, through the works of the great Panini, it was polished into Sanskrit approximately 2400 years ago, close to the turn of our era, and in Persia-Iran, the Aryan languages ​​became the basis of a group of Iranian languages, the oldest of which date back to the 2nd millennium BC. Everything fits together.

This is what it means when linguists do not have in their hands the dates of the life and migration of the Aryans, in particular, in the territory of modern India and Iran. Hence, they, the Aryans, and then all the others - the inhabitants of the Russian plain, the Dnieper region, the Black Sea region, the Caspian region, the southern Urals - were all given the title of “Indo-Europeans”, and even more so “Iranian-speaking”, exactly the opposite.

That's where these clumsy "Indo-Europeans" came from. In fact, they had Aryan languages ​​even without any India or Iran, throughout the Russian plain and up to the Balkans. They, the Aryans, brought the language to Europe, and they also brought it to Iran and India. From India to Europe there is one and the same group of languages ​​- Aryan. And they took it and called it “Indo-European”, “Indo-Iranian”, “Iranian”. And what is generally incomprehensible to the mind is that our people, our ancestors, the Proto-Slavs turned out to be “Indo-Europeans”, or even “Iranians”. "Iranian-speaking residents of the Dnieper." What's it like?

It’s time, finally, for philologists and linguists to put things in order. We, DNA genealogists, will help.”

Conclusion 1. All Indian Vedas and other epics wrote Aryans, this is recognized in India, and the Aryans, as proven above, are Slavs. In the minds of the ancestors of the Indians, they clearly associated their gods with Hyperborea. Thus, a thread was stretched connecting the Slavs and Hyperborea. It's funny, isn't it?
Go ahead. Well, they proved that the Aryans are Slavs, and then what? For some reason (I’ll tell you why a little later), despite the fact that they are the most ancient people, no written or other sources of their antiquity have been preserved. And written records have been preserved in India, and since the Aryans wrote them, and the Aryans are Slavs, we will try to trace the history of the Slavs through Indian records, since they did not describe the territory of India, where they did not yet exist, but the area where they lived before India . Logical? For example, Mahabharata. Describes a battle that took place 5102 years ago. But there were no Aryans in India at that time; they came there later. This means that the battle was not in India, but we’ll talk about where later.

3. Svetlana Zharnikova, candidate of historical sciences, art critic, ethnographer, who has devoted many years to the study of traditional folk culture of the Russian North. Here are some excerpts from her article:

“Coincidences in river names leading to speculation

Being a resident of the Volga region, not believing my eyes, I look at the map of Russia. In the Volga region I read the names of large and small Russian rivers: Kama, Arya, Moksha, Shivskaya, Kumarevka, Shankini, Kubdzha, Nara, lake. Rama, Sit, Ravan, etc. I remember that I read somewhere that the river at the mouth of the Oka is still called “Kala” by local residents, and I can’t help thinking that something incredible is happening before my eyes, something that I couldn’t even imagine and introduce. After all, these are the rivers described in the Mahabharata as sacred springs in the chapter “pilgrimage to sacred springs.” This chapter describes more than 200 sacred rivers of the ancient Aryan land of Bharata in the Ganges and Yamuna basins (3 thousand BC).
In the book of Doctor of Philosophy Guseva N.R. “The Russian North – the ancestral home of the Indo-slavs” contains very interesting data from many years of research:
Among the many legends preserved in the memory of mankind, the ancient Indian epic Mahabharata is considered the greatest monument of culture, science and history of the ancestors of all Indo-European peoples. Initially, this was a story about the civil strife of the Kuru peoples, who lived more than 5 thousand years ago between the Indus and the Ganges. Gradually, new ones were added to the main text - and the Mahabharata came to us containing almost 200 thousand lines of poetry in 18 books. In one of them, called “Forest”, sacred springs are described - rivers and lakes of the country of the ancient Aryans, i.e. the land on which the events told in the great poem unfolded.
But, speaking about this country, called Bharata in the epic, we note that the final event of the story was the grandiose battle of Kurukshetra in 3102 BC. However, as scientific data testify, there were no Aryan tribes on the territory of Iran and Hindustan at that time, and they lived in their ancestral homeland - quite far from India and Iran.
But where was she, where did all these grandiose events unfold? This question has worried researchers since the last century. In the middle of the 19th century. the idea was expressed that such an ancestral home was the territory of Eastern Europe. In the middle of the twentieth century. The German scientist Scherer returned to the idea that the ancestral home of all Indo-Europeans was on the lands of Russia, proceeding from the fact that, judging by the texts of the Rig Veda and Avesta, in the 3rd millennium BC. The Aryans lived in Eastern Europe. As you know, the great river of our Motherland - the Volga - until the 2nd century. AD bore the name by which the sacred book of the Zoroastrians Avesta knew her - Ranha or Ra. But the Ranha of the Avesta is the river Ganga of the Rig Veda and Mahabharata!
As the Avesta narrates, along the shores of the Vorukasha Sea (Milk Sea of ​​the Mahabharata) and Rankha (Volga) there were a number of Aryan countries from Aryanam Vaeja in the far north to seven Indian countries in the south, beyond Rankha. These same seven countries are mentioned in the Rigveda and Mahabharata as the lands between the Ganga and the Yamuna, on Kurukshetra. It is said about them: “The illustrious Kurukshetra, all living beings, as soon as they come there, get rid of their sins,” or “Kurukshetra is the holy Altar of Brahma; holy brahmanas - sages - appear there. Whoever settles in Kurukshetra will never know sorrow.” The question naturally arises: what are these rivers Ganga and Yamuna, between which the country of Brahma lay? We have already found out that Ranha-Ganga is the Volga. But ancient Indian legends call the Yamuna the only major tributary of the Ganges flowing from the southwest. Let's look at the map, and it will become clear to us that the ancient Yamuna is our Eye! Is it possible? Apparently, yes! It is no coincidence that along the course of the Oka here and there there are rivers with the names: Yamna, Yam, Ima, Imyev. Moreover, according to Aryan texts, the second name of the Yamuna river was Kala. So, to this day the mouth of the Oka is called the mouth of the Kala by local residents. In the Volga-Oka interfluve there are many rivers, the names of which have been lost for millennia. It doesn't take much effort to prove this. It is enough to compare the names of the Poochya rivers with the names of the “sacred springs” in the Mahabharata, more precisely, in that part of it that is known as “Walking along the springs”. It is in it that a description is given of more than 200 sacred reservoirs of the ancient Aryan land of Bharata in the Ganges and Yamuna basins (as of 3150 BC).

Krinitsa River in Poochie

Agastya Agashka
Aksha Aksha
Apaga Apaka
Archika Archikov
Ashita Asata
Ahalya Akhalenka
Vadawa Vad
Vamana Wamna
Vansha Vansha
Varaha Varah
Varadana Varaduna
Kaveri Kaverka
Kedara Kindra
Khubja Kubja
Kumara Kumarevka
Kushika Kushka
Manusha Manushinskaya
Pariplava Plava
Crybaby Crybaby
lake Frame lake Frame
Sita City
Soma Soma
Sutirtha Sutertki
Tushin Tushina
Urvashn Urvanovsky
Ushanas Ushanes
Shankhini Shankini
Shona Shana
Shiva Shivskaya
Yakshini Yakshina

It is surprising that we are dealing not only with an almost literal coincidence of the names of the sacred springs of the Mahabharata and the rivers of Central Russia, but even with the correspondence of their relative locations.

Another example. According to the Mahabharata, south of the sacred Kamyaka forest, the Praveni River (that is, the Pra River) flowed into the Yamuna, with Lake Godowari (where “vara” means “circle” in Sanskrit). What about today? As before, to the south of the Vladimir forests the Pra River flows into the Oka and Lake Godd lies.

Or another example. The Mahabharata tells how the sage Kaushika, during a drought, irrigated the Paru River, which was renamed in his honor. But further the epic reports that ungrateful local residents still call the river Para and it flows from the south to the Yamuna (i.e. to the Oka). And what? The Para River still flows from the south to the Oka, and the locals call it the same as many thousands of years ago.

The description of springs five thousand years ago speaks, for example, of the Pandya River, flowing near Varuna, a tributary of the Sindhu (Don). But the Panda River even today flows into the largest tributary of the Don - the Vorona (or Barona) River. Describing the path of pilgrims, the Mahabharata says: “There are Jala and Upajala, the rivers flowing into the Yamuna.” Are there rivers Jala (“jala” - “water/river” in Sanskrit) and Upa-jala flowing nearby somewhere today? Eat. These are the Zhala (Tarusa) river and the Upa river, flowing nearby into the Oka.

It was in the Mahabharata that the Sadanapru (Great Danapr) - Dnieper river flowing west from the upper reaches of the Ganga (Volga) was first mentioned.

The Mahabharata and Rigveda mention the Kuru and Kurukshetra people. Kurukshetra (literally “Kursk Field”), and it is in its center that the city of Kursk is located, where “The Tale of Igor’s Campaign” places the Kursk people - noble warriors.

The warlike Krivi people are also mentioned in the Rig Veda. But Latvians and Lithuanians call all Russians “Krivi”, after the neighboring Russian ethnic group Krivichi, whose cities were Smolensk, Polotsk, Pskov, and present-day Tartu and Riga. Well, what about the ethnonym Rus itself - Russian land? Are they mentioned in ancient texts that are thousands of years old?

Rusa, Rasa, Rasyane are constantly mentioned in the Rig Veda and Avesta. As for the Russian land, it’s a matter of translation. The lands of Bharata, lying along the Ganges and Yamuna, on Kurukshetra, were otherwise called Sacred, Holy or Bright Land, and in Sanskrit “Rusa” means “bright”.
It turns out that from time immemorial, without knowing it, we have been living on the sacred land of Bharata? Rusa-Volga-Ganga, Yamuna-Oka carry the same waters in which the characters of the Vedas and the Mahabharata acted? This is exactly what Indology researchers claim in their book, and we have no reason to disagree with them.

Indeed, with a little logical analysis, the following versions are quite acceptable:

1. The original Ganga and nearby rivers, Kurukshetra field, etc. were actually located in the Volga region. The actions described in the Vedas and Mahabharata actually took place in these places. Then the Indo-Slavic Aryans were forced to migrate south (to India, Iran, Pakistan), and transferred the old names of cult rivers and lakes, projecting them onto local rivers located in what is now India.

2. The original Ganga, its tributaries, sacred rivers and lakes of the ancient Aryans, as well as the field of Kurukshetra, described in the Mahabharata, exist in a higher – another subtle dimension, being “heavenly”, spiritual realities, “pure land”. They really exist in a subtle spiritual dimension - “pure vision”. On the material, physical plane, they can be projected and fully manifested at any point in the area. Such projection depends on the direction of the collective consciousness and subconscious of humanity - the so-called “karmic vision”. Such a statement seems incredible only at first glance. For someone who knows Advaita Vedanta, yoga-siddha, it seems quite plausible and satisfactorily explains the Volga-Ganga phenomenon.”
Well, what do you say to this? And if we add to this the striking similarity of the Russian (as well as Belarusian and Ukrainian) languages? I believe that we cannot brush this off, as many historians do. However, I myself am skeptical about the conclusions of these classical historians. Let's move on.
We found out that for about 4900±300 years (such a range exists due to the vast territory), the ancestors of the Slavs lived on the Russian plain, later appeared in India, and created a culture there. What happened before?

4. “Mysteries of the “Western European” haplogroup R1b. The contribution of DNA genealogy to linguistics and archaeology.

This is the title of Anatoly Klesov’s articles. The material is extensive and clearly does not fit into the permissible size of a message on our website. Nevertheless, the issues raised by the author are so interesting that I dared to make arbitrary abbreviations.

Contrary to early, and factually unsubstantiated, claims that R1b is a "Western European" haplogroup whose ancestors lived in Europe 30 thousand years ago, and were definitely Cro-Magnons, in fact the European variant R1b is a relatively young haplogroup (mainly R1b1b2/M269), the ancestor which came to Europe from Asia no more than 4500-5000 years ago. Even the Basques, who (without much justification for haplogroup R1b) were considered the oldest inhabitants of Europe, have a common ancestor in haplogroup R1b no earlier than 4000-4600 years ago.

Haplogroup R1b attracts special attention from amateurs and professionals of DNA genealogy. The reason is simple - both have the most of it, at least according to the data currently available. This haplogroup is dominant in Western and Central Europe and the British Isles and is therefore most often tested in those able to pay for commercial haplotype and haplogroup determination. For a number of reasons, this is how residents of Western Europe find themselves.

As of the beginning of 2008, there were 44,093 haplotypes in the YSearch database, and of these, 17,171, that is, almost 40%, belonged to the R1b haplogroup with subgroups. This shows the desire and ability of Europeans to know their roots. For comparison, only 31 people of haplogroup R1a1 from Russia and Ukraine, out of several tens of millions, have so far shown such a combination of desire and opportunity.

As often happens in DNA genealogy, which is actually a nascent field of science, haplogroup R1b, as the most popular, quickly began to become overgrown with legends and fantasies. Some of them were based on hasty and unverified results, nevertheless published in serious scientific journals and books. Some appeared without any justification at all.

The most stable legend says that the Cro-Magnons had haplogroup R1b, that this haplogroup was in Europe 30-35 thousand years ago, its owners hunted side by side with Neanderthals, and its owners left cave drawings in southern Europe, which date back to 32 thousand years ago. The Basques are often cited as an example of particularly ancient carriers of haplogroup R1b. Apparently, because they have an ancient language that does not belong to the Indo-European language group.

This is how, for example, one of the DNA pioneers describes the R1b haplogroup
genealogy, Spencer Wells, in his recent book Deep Ancestry (2006): “About 30 thousand years ago, one of the descendants of the clan, who was on the way to Europe, received the M343 mutation, which assigned him to the new haplogroup R1b. The descendants of this man are direct descendants of the Cro-Magnons, who dominated the exploration of Europe and created famous cave paintings in caves in the south of France.”

A role in these legends was played by incorrect methods for calculating the “variation” of mutations in haplotypes, the use of certain “population” mutation rates, in which, quite arbitrarily and based on uncritical assumptions, the life times of the “common ancestors” of samples of haplotypes were sharply removed, errors were made in assigning haplotypes to haplogroups, or calculations were carried out without such assignments at all.

What we found out.
The Turkic-speaking haplogroup R1b advanced from Southern Siberia, where it was formed 16 thousand years ago, through the territories of the Middle Volga, Samara, Khvalynsk (in the middle reaches of the Volga) and ancient Yamnaya (“Kurgan”) archaeological cultures and cultural-historical
communities (8-6 thousand years ago and later; the common ancestor of the ethnic Russian haplogroup R1b1 lived 6775±830 years ago), northern Kazakhstan (for example, the Botai culture, recorded by archaeologists 5700-5100 years ago, is actually much older), passed through Caucasus to Anatolia (6000±800 years ago according to the dating of haplotypes of modern Caucasians of haplogroup R1b1b2), and through the Middle East (Lebanon, 5300±700 years ago; ancient ancestors of modern Jews, 5150±620 years ago) and Northern Africa (Berbers of haplogroup R1b, 3875±670 years ago) passed through the Strait of Gibraltar to the Iberian Peninsula (3750±520 years ago, Basques 3625±370 years ago) and further to the British Isles (in Ireland 3800±380 and 3350±360 years ago according to different populations) and to continental Europe (Flanders, 4150±500 years ago, Sweden 4225±520 years ago). The route to continental Europe from the Pyrenees –
this is the path and times of the Bell-Beaker culture, the ancestors of the Pracelts and Proto-Italics.

Typical representatives of haplogroup R1b are the Celts, who appeared in Western Europe 3500-4500 years ago. By the way, Celts is a collective name and was first used in its modern meaning not so long ago, at the beginning of the 18th century, by Edward Lyde, director of the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford. While traveling on museum business, he noticed the similarities between the languages ​​of the Welsh, Cornish, Bretons, Irish, Scottish Gauls, and ancient Gaulish languages. He united these languages ​​under the common name of Celtic languages, which he invented. Although the very name Celts was mentioned by Julius Caesar in his book “Notes on the Gallic War”, as a synonym for Gauls.

What kind of linguistic landscape did Eurasia represent by 6 thousand years ago (4th millennium BC), and in the next two thousand years? So, by 6 thousand years ago, carriers of haplogroup I, divided into two main subgroups I1 and I2, had already inhabited Europe for more than 30 thousand years. They practically did not leave the European continent. What is their
there was a language - it is unknown, but it is possible that the Basque language is the ancient language of the carriers of haplogroup I. It is known that the Basque language is non-Indo-European. It is currently considered an unclassified, agglutinative language. If it turns out to be not Proto-Turkic, then most likely it is the language of the ancient carriers of haplogroup I.

R1b carriers, as mentioned above, arrived on the Iberian Peninsula from northern Africa 3750±380 years ago (among the Basques 3625±370 years ago, and among the Basques 93% of them, Adams et al, 2008), and arrived through the Caucasus, which was inhabited by 6 thousand years ago. In this regard, it is important that some linguists define the Basque language in the Sino-Caucasian language macrofamily, which includes the Caucasian, Tibetan, Yenisei, Chinese and Burushaski languages ​​(private communication by I. Byzov). Here we definitely see a reflection of the path of haplogroup R1b from ancient times, from Southern Siberia (Yenisei and Chinese), through the Caucasus (6 thousand years ago) to the Pyrenees (Basques). So the assumption that the Basque language is an ancient language of haplogroup R1b is not without connection with the data of linguists. Moreover, the Basque language has the same numeral system as in the Caucasian languages ​​- 20-ary, and has common elements with the Semitic-Hamitic world, as well as Sumerian and Hurrito-Urartian (private communication by I. Byzov). This is all the path and surroundings of the path of haplogroup R1b to Europe.

The carriers of haplogroup R1a1, the Aryans, appeared in the Balkans 12 thousand years ago. In the 4th millennium BC they began to spread throughout
Europe, and 4750±500 years ago they reached the Russian Plain. Over the next few centuries, they settled from the Baltic to the Caucasus, about 4500 years ago they were already recorded in the Caucasus, and about 3600 years ago they were already in Anatolia. This is consistent with linguistic and archaeological data, and documentary evidence.

Anatolia cannot in any way be considered the “ancestral home” of the Indo-European language, not only because the concept of “ancestral home” in this context is generally incorrect, but also because Anatolia and the surrounding regions were among the territories that the Aryans visited during the development and settlement of Eurasia. From Anatolia, the Aryans are unlikely to have advanced far to the east, and certainly not to India or the eastern part of the Iranian plateau. These were the local places of residence of the Aryans (haplogroup R1a1).

4000 years ago, carriers of haplogroup R1a1 had already founded the Andronovo archaeological culture and reached the southern Urals. Archaeological excavations in the south of the Krasnoyarsk Territory revealed that bone remains dating back to 3800-3400 years have characteristic mutations of the R1a1 haplogroup (Keyser et al, 2009). Moreover, the haplotypes of these remains were easily integrated into the haplotype tree of modern ethnic Russians from the Ivanovo, Penza, Tver, Lipetsk, Novgorod, and Ryazan regions. In other words, these fossils and modern ethnic Russians had the same common ancestor, who, as we already know, lived approximately 4800 years ago.

About 3600 years ago, the Aryans (haplogroup R1a1) left the southern Urals in their part and moved to India. Around the same time, the Aryans of Central Asia, where they had lived for at least five hundred years, moved to Iran. The common ancestors of Indians and Iranians of haplogroup R1a1 lived 4050 and 4025 years ago, respectively (Klyosov, 2009b), which is 800 years “younger” than the common ancestor of modern ethnic Russians of haplogroup R1a1. The haplotypes of modern Eastern Slavs (haplogroup R1a1) are almost identical to the haplotypes of Indians and Iranians up to 25-marker and even 67-marker haplotypes, that is, maximum resolution
modern DNA genealogy.

In other words, the coincidence is almost absolute. On this basis, it should be argued that the Aryans of the 2nd millennium BC, carriers of haplogroup R1a1, are without any doubt the descendants of the same ancestors as modern ethnic Russians. At present, at least 100 million men live in India, descendants of the Aryans from the Russian Plain, and before that from the Balkans. Up to 72% of the upper castes in India belong to the R1a1 haplogroup (Sharma et al, 2009). These ancestors of modern Russians, as well as many modern Ukrainians, Belarusians, Lithuanians, Estonians, Tajiks, Kyrgyz, namely carriers of haplogroup R1a1, brought their Aryan inflectional language to India and Iran, which closed the linguistic link between Europe and India-Iran, and heralded the beginning of a new language family - the Indo-European languages. Even 150 years ago A.F. Hilferding in his work “On the affinity of the Slavic language with Sanskrit” (1853) wrote: “... The Slavic language, taken as a whole, does not differ from
Sanskrit by no permanent, organic change in sounds. Some features found in it, such as the lisping p of Czechs and Poles, etc., developed already in
later, historical era and belong only to a few of their dialects, but I repeat as a whole, the Slavic language does not have a single feature alien to Sanskrit. This property is shared with the Lithuanian language, while all other Indo-European languages ​​are subject to different sound laws, which are exclusively characteristic of each of them separately.

Thus, in lexical terms the languages ​​are Slavic and Lithuanian
are closely related to Sanskrit and together with it form a kind of separate family in the Indo-European tribe, outside of which are the Persian and Western European languages.” We now know that the Persian or Iranian languages ​​were also basically brought to the eastern part of the Iranian plateau by Aryans, carriers of haplogroup R1a1, at about the same time as to India, but by Aryans who had already lived for at least several hundred years (possibly at least 500 years) in Central Asia.

So, the linguistic landscape in Europe 6 thousand years ago, or at the turn of the 4th and 5th millennium BC, was Old Aryan, an R1a1 language, and perhaps to some extent the language (or languages) of the ancient European haplogroup I The language of the latter could also be ancient Aryan, or could be the proto-language of the modern Basques, or be a now unknown language. The Turkic language was brought by haplogroup R1b1b2 only about 4 thousand years ago, at the turn of the 2nd and 3rd millennia BC.

About 4500-4000 years ago, something happened in Europe, as a result of which the R1a1 haplogroup practically disappeared from Europe (see below). As, by the way, at the same time, haplogroup I1 and, to a large extent, haplogroup I2 disappeared. Soon after this, Europe was populated by carriers
Turkic-speaking R1b (mainly its subgroups R1b1b2). There could be two main reasons - either the almost complete extermination of other haplogroups by R1b ​​carriers, or between 4000 and 4500 years ago a major natural disaster occurred in Europe, and the Turkic-speaking R1b1b2 populated an already almost deserted Europe. You can find evidence in favor of one or the other assumption.

The possibility of the first is indicated by the findings of many ancient human remains with crushed skulls in Scandinavia, dating back to approximately the same time, which even received the code name “period of crushed skulls.” Characteristically, many finds revealed crushed skulls of women and children (Lindqvist, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1997, 1998). This is echoed by the discovery of a group of 13 people in Germany,
most of whom were children and women, most (including children) with crushed skulls and stone arrowheads embedded in their bones, dating back to 4,600 years ago. For two boys (ages 4-5 and 8-9 years) and a man aged 40-60 years, the haplogroup could be determined, and for all three it was R1a (Haak et al, 2008). An analysis of the scene showed that women, the elderly and children were killed during the absence of adults, apparently by a hostile tribe.

Apparently, according to the standard scheme, the period of “crushed skulls” is associated with the “Indo-European invasion”, not understanding that the “Indo-Europeans” already lived in Europe from 12 thousand years ago, and there was no “invasion” of them from the west. Later, from the end of the 3rd millennium BC. and over the next one and a half millennia, before moving to India and Iran, the vector of their migrations was directed to the east. The so-called “Kurgan theory” had absolutely nothing to do with the “Indo-Europeans”, that is, with the carriers of R1a1, the Aryans, but related to the carriers of R1b, who were Turkic-speaking, and indeed moved to the west and further to the south, through the Caucasus to Asia Minor, northern Africa and further through the Strait of Gibraltar to Europe, as described above, moreover, a thousand or more years earlier than the Aryans. They also had nothing to do with “Indo-”, neither linguistic nor migration, and one can only wonder how such a theory could even appear. As, indeed, is the “Anatolian” theory of the “Indo-European ancestral home”.
.
We return to Europe 4500-4000 years ago. So, the option of exterminating carriers of haplogroups R1a1 and I has a historical basis. Moreover, in Scandinavia, haplogroup I1 was (then and now) especially common, so that crushed skulls in
Sweden could relate primarily to them. But a major natural disaster in Europe between 4500 and 4000 years ago cannot be ruled out.
Whatever the reason, haplogroup R1a1 practically disappeared from Europe approximately 4500-4000 years ago, and Turkic-speaking carriers of haplogroup R1b populated deserted Europe. As shown a few lines below, almost all modern branches of haplogroup R1a1 in Europe date back to 2900-2500 years ago and later. At the same time, there is evidence that haplogroup R1a1 was in Europe starting 12 thousand years ago. Archaeological excavations have identified haplogroup R1a1 in Europe (Germany) 4600 years ago (see above). Otherwise
speaking, in Europe with R1a1 there is a gap between the mid-to-late 3rd millennium BC. (4500-4000 years ago) and lasting for a thousand - one and a half thousand years. At the same time, with regard to R1b1b2 in Europe there is no gap; their settlement has been a continuous stream since 4000-4200 years ago, without
stops.

As a result of this, Europe apparently became Turkic-speaking. R1a1 remained only on the Russian Plain, the descendants of those who moved there about 5 thousand years ago. A few more centuries later, approximately 3,500 years ago, the surviving descendants of the R1a1 haplogroup, which had by then disappeared in Europe, would bring their haplotypes and the Aryan language they preserved to the Urals and Central Asia, to India and Iran, to Siberia. The common ancestor of all these branches of haplogroup R1a1 lived on the Russian Plain 4750±500 years ago. This is again DNA genealogy data with inevitable conclusions of a linguistic nature. It is known that the Aryan, Proto-Indo-European language was brought to India and Iran. It is hardly to be assumed that the same genus R1a1 brought some other language to the Urals and Southern Siberia at the same time.

Modern ratio of ancient genera in Europe. .

The repopulation of Europe by R1a1 carriers occurred in the period 2900-2500 years ago, that is, from the beginning to the middle of the first millennium BC, and later. This is what the life times of the common ancestors R1a1 of the main European DNA genealogical branches look like (Rozhansky and Klyosov, 2009), times are indicated in years from the present:
European northwestern 2925±370 years ago
North Carpathian 2800±350
Western Eurasian 2750±370
Central European 2725±300
Western Slavic 2575±300
Southern Eurasian 2550±320
Western Carpathian 2150±300
Scandinavian 1900±400
Northern Eurasian 1575±260
It was the speakers of inflected, Indo-European languages ​​who returned to Europe. As you can see, for a number of regions this was the end of the last era and the beginning of our era. As a result of this migration, the Turkic European languages ​​were replaced by Indo-European ones, and this tipped the scales towards the current European languages.

Some conclusions seem controversial. Europe never became Turkic. At best, the first generations of conquerors who appeared on European soil already spoke a mixture of Turkic and Aryan.
This happened because the victors spared (naturally) the Aryan girls, and even the last warrior acquired an extensive harem; gentlemen prefer blondes. Children were raised by Aryan mothers, even if they were initially retrained in Turkic, the amount of work was too great, and the war lasted a thousand years. The partial return of the Aryans to Central Europe 500 years BC laid the foundation for the Western Slavs, but could not in any way affect the languages ​​of the speakers of Western European R1b, the Celts, Germans, and Italics.
It should be noted that the Slavophiles of the past, and even modern ones, such as the philologist Dragunkin or Ryzhkov, are right - the basis of European languages ​​is a truncated, distorted Proto-Slavic. This is obvious in the light of the above material. But I would tone down the pathos, since this is evidence of a complete catastrophe in the war between our relatives with the invasion of the “African” Turks.”

Look what happens. The ancestors of the Slavs lived throughout Europe earlier than 5000 years ago, and about 5000 years ago something happened that the Slavs almost completely disappeared from the face of Europe, and the depopulated lands were occupied by Turkic peoples a little later. Genetic studies show this. What do official historians say? And almost the same.
Approximately 6-3 thousand years BC. there was the so-called Tripoli culture, which was widespread in the territory of right-bank Ukraine, in Moldova, in eastern Romania (Cucuteni), as well as in Hungary[
Vinca culture (Old Europe, V-III millennium BC). In addition to the territory of Serbia, the Vinca culture was widespread in Hungary (Osentivan), Romania (Turdas) and Bulgaria (Gradesnica). Sometimes the Greek finds in Dimini are attributed to Vinca.
In both cultures, archaeologists dug up 1, 2 and 3-story houses with pitched roofs; settlements numbered 50-60 thousand people.
And pay attention to the dates - III millennium BC. they mysteriously disappeared.
Here's what archaeologists say about the Trypillian culture:
“In recent years, after excavations of settlements of the Trypillian culture on the Dnieper, we have received many isotopic dates for the settlements of the Grigoriev group, which are located along the Dnieper between the modern city of Rzhishchev and the village. Grigorievka. We immediately noticed that it was the later dates that were stubbornly grouped around 3200-3100. BC. Previously, dates were obtained for later monuments of the Trypillian culture of the Dnieper region. They indicated an age between 2900-2750. BC. Comparison of dates showed that the area remained uninhabited between approximately 3100-2900 BC. BC, i.e. for 200 years. This territory has been studied quite well, and it is unlikely that any settlement will be found that existed during the specified period of time. And in addition, archaeologists have long drawn attention to the noticeable difference between the material culture of the Trypillian people of the Dnieper region of the last centuries of the 4th millennium BC. and the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC. By all indicators, they looked like two different archaeological cultures. The dishes were different; in later settlements they stopped building houses using clay to cover the floors, and they stopped making figurines. It seemed as if new people had simply come and populated the devastated land.”
Well then what happened 5000 thousand years ago?

4. The grandiose battle of Kurukshetra in 3102 BC.
The ancient Indian (meaning ancient Slavic) epic Mahabharata tells that 3102 BC. between two brothers, i.e. At first one nation took part in the battle, then other nations were drawn in. At first they used, to put it in modern terms, artillery, tanks, aircraft, then super weapons were used. It describes that there was so much light from this superweapon that the sun seemed dim. The temperature was such that everything around melted, many people died immediately and many died later. According to research, the battle took place in the area of ​​modern Kursk, on the Kursk Field. Well, after the use of superweapons (nuclear weapons), there is no need to talk about any local battlefield; many cities and villages were destroyed. So it turns out that the ancestors of the Slavs, who lived throughout Europe and most likely had a developed civilization, killed each other during the battle and destroyed civilization. The Mahabharata says so. that after the battle humanity began to degrade.
Do you think this is fantasy? Let's talk about it. Let's take our time. Let's imagine that there was a war with the use of nuclear weapons (ugh, ugh, ugh). What will happen? Well, firstly, many nations will be drawn into the war, it will not be a local war. Secondly, many cities will be destroyed, there will be no electricity, since many thermal power plants, hydroelectric power stations, nuclear power plants will be destroyed, and kilometers of power lines will simply be knocked down. Further, if there is no electricity, nothing will work. Now everything is tied to him. Plants and factories have been destroyed, communications and transport are not working, there is no gasoline. I’m not talking about the fact that after nuclear explosions, multi-day downpours and a “nuclear winter” should occur. In the first years, in order to restore something - none of the surviving people will even think about this, everyone will have one thing to do - survive, feed, dress, keep warm. Children will not study at this time, a generation will be lost. Years will pass, if someone tries to restore something, there will be no opportunities - there are no personnel, an illiterate generation has grown up all around, etc. The point of return has been passed. As a result, people will remain, but civilization in our understanding will no longer exist. And everything will come back, and there will be bows, arrows, horses, etc. again. Thousands of years will pass and not a trace will remain of the former civilization, everything will turn to dust, except for the stones.
Which is what happened in 3102 BC.
And also, will you notice that all the early civilizations (which we studied in school) arose later than 3102 BC? This date is like “some kind of watershed.”
In the 3rd millennium BC. e. civilization arose in the Nile River valley in Egypt, between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in Mesopotamia. Somewhat later - in the III-II millennium BC. e. Indian civilization arose in the Indus River valley in the 2nd millennium BC. e. in the valley of the Yellow River - Chinese.
More. There are many examples that the ancients had knowledge that sometimes surpassed ours. Isn't this proof that a highly developed civilization once existed? Hyperborea or it was called something else, it doesn’t matter. Here is one example - the well-known pyramids in Egypt. They are fraught with a lot of mysteries - from the time of construction to the construction process. Even official science cannot come to a unified time for the construction of the pyramids; many are inclined to believe that they were built much earlier than 2600 BC.
“The Egyptian pyramids are a mystery that has fascinated us for centuries. Back in school, in history lessons, we learn that these pyramids were built as tombs for the pharaohs. The construction was simply horrific - blood and sweat, the death of numerous slaves. The illustrations show people in loincloths wheezing from exertion, giant pyramid blocks tied with ropes...
But a small fact casts doubt on the entire logical structure - the sarcophagi in the pyramids are empty. In the Valley of the Kings there are crypts and tombs of the pharaohs, nestled close to the pyramids. There are funeral and ritual utensils, there are sarcophagi with mummies, in general, everything that is required. But not in the pyramids.
One more tiny fact. It is said that the Egyptians were excellent mathematicians, they mastered the principle of leverage, and this is what allowed them to build the magnificent pyramids. But even with a lever, the construction of the Great Pyramid of Cheops would have taken about 140 years. It is known that the construction was completed in two decades. As they say, there is an inconsistency.
The most amazing thing about the pyramids is, strictly speaking, not their gigantic size, but the technologies used during construction. The joints between the plates are not just tight, but very, very tight, and how this was achieved is completely unclear. Moreover, many ancient buildings have been preserved in Egypt, but none of them are distinguished by such amazing quality of stone laying as the pyramids. Moreover, in all other buildings the masonry is the most common, fully consistent with the standards of that time. Not so with the pyramids.
In addition, many different fragments were found in the Valley of the Kings - stones and blocks with traces of mechanical processing. But here’s an interesting thing: holes of very small diameter are drilled in granite. And even with the help of modern tools it is impossible to achieve such a diameter with such material and cleanliness of the holes. The stones have amazing engravings, inscriptions literally a fraction of a millimeter in size. The impression is that this is the work of a miniature cutter.
But how could the ancient Egyptians make such an instrument? And from what? Super-strong alloys, from which tools are now made, were not known then, and there were no technologies for working with them (and the most basic thing: how could one obtain the temperature necessary to work with such alloys?).
Many people know that it is possible to make a pyramid under which the blades will sharpen themselves and food will be stored better than in the refrigerator. But this home-grown “energy pyramid” is an exact copy of the Egyptian monuments, only, of course, greatly reduced. It is believed that the best option is not just a pyramid, but one made to individual sizes (the length of the edge is the distance from the fingertips to the elbow of the “consumer”).
But the technology of building pyramids is a sealed secret. The art of granite processing reached unprecedented heights in Ancient Egypt. And it evokes not only respect, but also amazement. Indeed, it is impossible to explain everything by the principle “persistence and work will grind everything down.” This is not enough. The examples of ancient Egyptian granite architecture that have reached us demonstrate not only the highest level of processing and construction technology, but also require the ancients to have sufficiently advanced knowledge in the field of natural sciences. Moreover, the closer we come to the origins of Egyptian civilization, the higher these indicators are. The construction technology exhibited by the Giza Plateau monuments has not since been surpassed or improved upon. On the contrary, there is a process of degradation of many aspects of early Egyptian civilization that we observe in the 3rd millennium BC. during the period of the Old Kingdom. The very phenomenon of the emergence of such a cultural complex with an ordered system of hieroglyphic writing, a developed calendar, and a developed technology for monumental construction causes genuine amazement. And in this aspect, the ideas of those researchers who consider Ancient Egypt the heir of an even more ancient and more developed civilization, the traces of which have reached us very few, are completely appropriate and legitimate. But there are such traces, you just need to not ignore them, be able to study them and interpret them correctly.

And further. According to the Egyptian priest Maneto, the predynastic period in Egypt ended 3100 BC. and the dynastic began. Please note the date.
The ancient Sumerians, who also possessed some mysterious knowledge and skills in many areas, disappeared around the same time, after them a state arose, in which there was also a process of degradation of many aspects of the early Sumerian civilization.

Conclusion: 3102 BC There was a war on Earth, as a result of which a highly developed civilization perished and humanity began to degrade.