At the time the play was written, society was ruled by heroes like Wild. His portrait is similar to hundreds of other wealthy merchants, immersed in a luxurious lifestyle, absolute ignorance. Such people pulled Russia to the bottom. IN dark kingdom stupidity, stupidity, medieval mores. The image and characterization of the Wild in the play "Thunderstorm" is negative. He is the true embodiment of the concept of tyranny. He is a prominent representative of wild customs and a harsh attitude towards people and life.

Savel Prokofievich Wild- a wealthy merchant in the city of Kalinov. negative character.

Image and characteristics

Wild man, to put it mildly, unpleasant. This impression is due to the terrible character. Wife of Diky, knowing that it is better not to anger her husband, begins every morning to tearfully address others:

“Fathers, don’t be angry! Doves, don't get angry!

And so every day. It is easy to guess how she gets from him if she disobeys or deigns to be angry. There is no talk of a happy, family life.

Wild typical portrait of a petty tyrant. Used to feel like a full-fledged ruler of the city. I am absolutely sure that he has the right to influence the fate of the inhabitants, impudently interfering in their lives.

"If I want - I'll have mercy, if I want - I'll crush."

Feeling power over people, he uses it to the fullest, creating whatever comes into his head. Wild knows for sure that his antics will go unpunished.

Rude and boor. Speaking is a complete nightmare. Solid swearing. Maybe he is used to expressing himself this way, believing that the interlocutor will understand faster. You won't get a good word from him. Wild knows exactly who to yell at and where to remain silent.

Man of moods. You never know what mood he will be in today. However, he was not seen smiling. Always gloomy and angry.

Not educated. I haven't read a single book in my entire life. Surnames famous writers confuse Savel. Doesn't know history. Not friendly with modernity. Thinks science is a waste of time. Stupidity, a ridiculous occupation unworthy of respect. In a word, wild man.

Recognizes actions. He is well aware that he is doing bad things, but changing the situation or changing himself is not for him.

“I know what I’m doing is bad, but I can’t help myself.”

Greedy for money. Money is the main thing in the life of Savel Prokofievich. Meaning and essence. Get money into the pocket of the Wild, he will never be able to part with them. Employees have forgotten what a salary is. As soon as someone asks to lend some money, Diky begins to internally rumble.

“Therefore, just give me a hint about money, it will start to inflame my whole inner one.”

When they try to reproach him with greed, Dikoy justifies himself:

"Who does not feel sorry for his own good."

It's rare that you can beg. But he hears enough of this, it will not seem enough.

attitude towards women. That's who gets it from Savel Prokofievich so it's poor women. All aggression is directed at the female gender. The only woman that the tyrant and despot is afraid of is Kabanikh. She respects. Opinion counts. The woman feels stronger and more cunning. The very character is akin to his.

Selfish. According to the will, Dikoy owes his nephew the inheritance that Boris inherited from his grandmother. One of the conditions for obtaining is a respectful attitude towards the uncle. Such conditions are favorable to the Wild. He takes advantage of this, forcing his nephew to plow on him from morning to night. It's like a free labor force. Why not exploit a relative. At the same time, Wild constantly humiliates and insults his nephew. Constantly reminds him, as if justified:

“I have my own children, why would I give money to strangers? Through this, I must offend my own!

Cowardly. Despite the fighting nature of the Wild, he is cowardly, like a hare. An ordinary thunderstorm can make him tremble. He associates it with the Lord's punishment, supernatural power. He tries to hide from her, fearing that the thunder of heaven will break him.

Self-assured. Goes through life. Like a tank, it does not stop in front of obstacles on the way. He knows exactly what he is doing and is absolutely sure that he is doing the right thing. The opinion of others is irrelevant.

Dikoy's speech characterizes him as an extremely rude and ignorant person. He does not want to know anything about science, culture, inventions that improve life. Kuligin's proposal to install a lightning rod infuriates him. His behavior fully justifies the surname given to him. "How off the chain!" characterizes him Curly. But Wild fights only with those who are afraid of him or who are completely in his hands. cowardice like feature tyranny Dobrolyubov noted in the article “The Dark Kingdom”: “Just show up somewhere strong and decisive rebuff, the strength of the tyrant falls, he begins to coward and get lost.” And indeed, Dikoi never ceases to scold Boris, his household, peasants, even the meek Kuligin, who is completely foreign to him, but Kudryash receives a worthy rebuff from his clerk. “... He is the word, and I am ten; spit, and go. No, I won’t become a slave to him, ”says Yuvorit Kudryash. It turns out that the limit of the power of a tyrant depends on the degree of obedience of others. This was well understood by another mistress of the "dark kingdom" - Kabanikha.

In the guise of the Wild, despite all his militancy, there are features of the comic: the contradiction of his behavior to reason, the painful unwillingness to part with money looks too ridiculous. The boar, with its cunning, hypocrisy, cold, inexorable cruelty, is truly terrible. She is outwardly calm, well in control of herself. Measured, monotonous, without raising her voice, she exhausts her family with her endless moralizing. If Wild seeks to rudely assert his power, then Kabanikha acts under the guise of piety. She does not get tired of repeating that she cares not about herself, but about her children: “After all, out of love, parents are strict with you, out of love they scold you, everyone thinks to teach good. Well, I don't like it now." But her "love" is only a hypocritical mask for asserting personal power. From her "care" comes to complete stupefaction Tikhon, runs away from the house of Varvara. Her methodical, constant. tyranny tormented Katerina, led her to death. “If it wasn’t for my mother-in-law! .. - says Katerina. - She crushed me ... she made me sick of the house; the walls are even disgusting.” The boar is a cruel, heartless executioner. Even at the sight of Katerina's body pulled out of the Volga, she remains icy calm.

Savel Prokofievich Wild is one of the main characters of the work, presented by the writer in the form of an enterprising and powerful merchant, one of the wealthy residents of a county town.

The character of the Wild is distinguished by excessive shameless egoism and a desperate thirst for monetary wealth, bordering on insanity. Moral and moral principles in the nature of Wild are completely absent, and the observance of Orthodox church rites is more related to an imaginary deal with the Almighty for the remission of sins. The concept of conscience and compassion is unfamiliar for Wild, having caused suffering to people who are weak and below him in position, he does not experience any moral remorse and emotional distress.

The writer describes the merchant as uncontrollable, sometimes inadequate person, prone to bouts of rage and rage, manipulating people through the use of fear and pressure. Under Dikoy, he receives not only moral satisfaction, but also material benefits, since by underpaying the downtrodden peasants money for work, he guarantees himself a constant additional income.

Wild is extremely ignorant and uneducated, he completely lacks the desire to be enlightened and get rid of his dense darkness, he is not interested in either the current social situation or the historical past. Savel Prokofievich's speech consists of continuous curses, bile and rudeness, and inner world character is completely empty. At the same time, he loves to drink a glass, another vodka.

In addition to the cruel character traits of Diky, he is also characterized by cowardice in relation to those who are able to show the merchant his true place. Passing in front of Kabanikha, another representative of the dark kingdom, Dikoy realizes that the merchant's wife is a smarter and more cunning woman compared to him. Therefore, he takes out all his hatred and anger over innocent households. He is also afraid of the Wild Thunderstorm, but due to his ignorance, he considers it a supernatural phenomenon and tries to hide from it.

Aggressively expanding his life potential, moving towards a meeting of greed, cruelty, selfishness, only power and strength stop the Wild.

An essay about the Wild

Wild is one of the heroes of the play "Thunderstorm" by Alexander Nikolayevich Ostrovsky and wears speaking surname. In the work, the hero appears the richest merchant who enjoys extraordinary respect among all those around him. Using his example, the author shows the problem that existed in Russia not only at that time, but also now.

The action of the work takes place in a fictional city called Kalinov. This city is distinguished by its wildness, insignificance and residents with limited needs and outlook on life. The problems that the author reveals with the help of the city and its inhabitants are relevant for the whole of Russia even at the present time.

One of the social problems is also revealed with the help of a character named Wild. He was one of the most influential and wealthy people in the city, a merchant. The author never mentions his appearance, but a lot is known about his character. He was a man extremely cruel, rude, cavalier, aggressive and always embittered, and his mood was unstable. Neither his wife nor even he himself knew what mood he would be in the next minute. He headed himself the master of the city and life in general, allowed himself to humiliate, insult and scold with obscene language even strangers whom he did not know personally. For him, it has become the norm and commonplace, to some extent entertainment. It is worth noting that such behavior of the Wild allows herself only in relation to people who are below him in status and are not able to fight back. This shows his true face, insignificance and a rotten soul that has been corrupted by money and power.

Wild is absolutely definitely a negative character in the work of Alexander Nikolayevich Ostrovsky. Throughout the development of the plot, the hero has never shown at least some positive trait of his character. From him comes exclusively anger, anger and cruelty, showing his rotten inner world. Perhaps, giving to the outside world continuous and unreasonable anger, he hides his weakness, insecurity and unhappy life. People like Dikoi exist in modern world. Their once-existing kindness and openness spoil money, turning a person into a soulless creature, in whose priorities there are no truly worthwhile things.

Some interesting essays

• Description of the appearance and position of Gerasim in the story of Mumu

  Gerasim can be called the main character in this work. The story is filled with themes such as affection and fortitude. The described character allows the reader to draw such a conclusion

• The main characters of the work Scarecrow Zheleznikov

  A work known to every schoolchild called "Scarecrow" was written by the Soviet writer Vladimir Zheleznyakov - the author of a large number of novels and stories

• Love in the work Woe from Wit Griboyedov essay

  The theme of love in this work is key. At the beginning of the comedy, we observe the scene of the so-called love between Sophia and Alexei. Sophia saw an ideal in him and put him on a pedestal.

• Why is the story called The Miraculous Doctor?

  The story, written by Alexander Ivanovich Kuprin, belongs to the Christmas stories. This means that the whole story will be built on the expectation of a Christmas miracle, despite the social problems involved.

Like it or not, but the risk is constantly present in our lives. Whatever we do, whatever we do, whatever decisions we make, risk is always with us.

That is why Kabanova is so sad, and that is why Dikoya is so furious: until the last moment they did not want to shorten their broad manners and now they are in the position of a rich merchant on the eve of bankruptcy. Everything is still with him, and he sets the holiday today, and he decided on a million-dollar turnover in the morning, and the credit has not yet been undermined; but some dark rumors are already circulating that he has no cash capital, that his scams are unreliable, and tomorrow several creditors intend to present their claims; there is no money, there will be no delay, and the whole building of the charlatan specter of wealth will be overturned tomorrow. Things are bad... Of course, in such cases, the merchant directs all his concern to tricking his creditors and making them believe in his wealth: just as the Kabanovs and Dikiye are now busy with only continuing faith in their strength. They do not expect to improve their affairs; but they know that their self-will will still have enough scope as long as everyone will be shy before them; and that is why they are so stubborn, so arrogant, so formidable even in their last moments, of which there are already few left to them, as they themselves feel. The less they feel the real power, the more they are affected by the influence of the free, common sense which proves to them that they are deprived of any rational support, the more impudently and madly they deny all the demands of reason, putting themselves and their own arbitrariness in their place. The naivety with which Dikoy says to Kuligin: “I want to consider you a swindler, and I think so; and I don't care what you fair man, and I don’t give an account to anyone why I think so,” this naivete could not have expressed itself in all its self-conscious absurdity, if Kuligin had not called her out with a modest request: “but why do you offend an honest person? ..”

Dikoi wants, you see, from the very first time to cut off any attempt to demand an account from him, he wants to show that he is above not only accountability, but also ordinary human logic. It seems to him that if he recognizes over himself the laws of common sense common to all people, then his importance will suffer greatly from this. And indeed, in most cases, this is indeed the case, because his claims are contrary to common sense. Hence, eternal discontent and irritability develop in him. He himself explains his situation when he talks about how hard it is for him to give out money. “What will you tell me to do when my heart is like that! After all, I already know what I need to give, but I can’t do everything with good. You are my friend, and I must give it back to you, but if you come and ask me, I will scold you. I will give - I will give, but I will scold. Therefore, just give me a hint about money, my whole interior will be kindled; kindles the whole interior, and only ... Well, in those days I would never scold a person for anything. The return of money, as a material and visual fact, even in the mind of the Wild one awakens some reflection: he realizes how absurd he is, and shifts the blame on "what kind of heart he has"! In other cases, he is not even well aware of his absurdity; but by the nature of his character, he must certainly feel the same irritation at every triumph of common sense as when he has to give out money. This is why it is hard for him to pay: out of natural egoism, he wants to feel good; everything around him convinces him that this good thing comes with money; hence the direct attachment to money. But here his development stops, his egoism remains within the limits of an individual and does not want to know its relationship to society, to its neighbors. He needs more money - he knows this, and therefore he would like only to receive it, and not to give it away. When, in the natural course of affairs, it comes to bestowal, he becomes angry and swears: he accepts this as a misfortune, a punishment, like a fire, a flood, a fine, and not as a proper, legal retribution for what others do for him. So it is in everything: at the desire for good for himself, he wants space, independence; but does not want to know the law that determines the acquisition and use of all rights in society. He only wants more, as many rights as possible for himself; when it is necessary to recognize them for others, he considers this an encroachment on his personal dignity, and becomes angry, and tries in every possible way to delay the matter and prevent it. Even when he knows that he must certainly give in, and he will give in later, but still he will try to play a dirty trick first. “I will give - I will give, but I will scold!” And it must be assumed that the more significant the issuance of money and the more urgent the need for it, the more strongly Dikoy curses ... them, would have retreated from the money and thought that it was impossible to get it, he would have acted very stupidly; secondly, that it would be in vain to hope for the correction of Diky by means of some kind of admonishment: the habit of fooling is already so strong in him that he obeys it even contrary to the voice of his own common sense. It is clear that no reasonable convictions will stop him until an external force that is tangible for him is connected with them: he scolds Kuligin, not heeding any reasons; and when a hussar once scolded him on a ferry, on the Volga, he did not dare to contact the hussar, but again he took out his insult at home: for two weeks after that everyone hid from him in attics and closets ...

Dobrolyubov N.A. "A Ray of Light in a Dark Realm"

Read also other topics of analysis of the drama "Thunderstorm":

Dobrolyubov N.A. "A Ray of Light in a Dark Realm"

• Wild. Characteristic

Alexander Ostrovsky in the play "Thunderstorm" divided all the inhabitants of the city into two large groups: the "dark kingdom" and the oppressed. The first includes those who are powerful, rich and overwhelming everything modern and living. Outstanding representatives of this group are Wild and Boar. The author contrasts them with the victims of the "dark kingdom", the oppressed people. These include Kuligin, Katerina, Boris, Tikhon, Varvara, Kudryash. The unfortunate heroes suffer equally from the representatives of the "dark kingdom", only they show their protest in different ways.

Money rules the world

Characterization of Wild becomes clear after reading the name of the landowner, which speaks for itself. Savel Prokofich is a wealthy merchant and a very respected person in the city of Kalinov. This is one of the most negative characters in the play. Rude, aggressive, ignorant, stubborn - like this a brief description of Wild. This person feels his impunity, so he is led by unbridled arbitrariness. The landowner allows himself to treat people as nonentities, to be rude, to call names, to offend - all this gives him untold pleasure.

Wild can be described in one word - tyrant. Savel Prokofich intimidated everyone around him, there is no rest from him either to the people around him or to his relatives. The reader's characterization of Diky is disgusting. Every day his wife, with tears in her eyes, begs everyone not to anger the master, but it is impossible not to anger him: he himself does not know what mood he will be in a minute. From the rage of Savel Prokofich, the household hide in closets and attics.

Excessive greed of the landowner

The characterization of the Wild will be more complete if greed is also added to tyranny. More than anything, he loves his money, parting with which for him is like a knife in the heart. The servants did not dare to hint about a salary. The owner himself understands that the money needs to be given back, and in the end he will give it back, but before that he will definitely scold the person. Offending someone, injecting the master more painfully was worth nothing. He is not at all ashamed of outsiders, uses strong words and, without hesitation, swaggers over those who are weaker than him.

Ignorance and despotism of the moneybags

Cowardice in front of equals, rejection of everything new - this is also a characteristic of the Wild. The landowner does not care about the feelings of the people around him, but he holds his temper before those who can fight back. Savel Prokofich did not dare to be rude to a passing hussar, but then he took out his insult on his family. He also does not dare to show his character to Kabanikhe, since he considers her equal to himself.

Ostrovsky very well showed the ignorance of Wild in a conversation between the landowner and Kulagin. Savel sincerely believes that the storm is sent as a punishment for sins. He accuses Kulagin of fraud, because how can you defend yourself from the elements with goats and poles. The characterization of Wild shows what a stupid and backward person he really is. His ignorance can be traced in the manner of speaking, in intonation, the use of abusive, offensive expressions, and the distortion of words of foreign origin. Rude, stupid, stubborn despot - that's what can be said about Diky.