The image of the false auditor in Gogol's comedy is not at all the main one, but it is a key character, on the basis of interaction with which the characters of all the heroes, officials of a small county town, are written out. Khlestakov was that touchstone, which shows all the comedy and bureaucratic lawlessness, and the whole life of Russia at that time. It is on the stupidity of this petty official, who happened to be passing through here, that all the stupidity and worthlessness of the local aristocracy and the bureaucratic elite looms.

Initially, a stupid, eccentric young man is shown with excessive claims to life, which, as we understand, are his style of behavior. Then we see in his example the reality of this nature in other heroes of the play.

Khlestakov's characteristic

The initial characterization of Khlestakov was already given by the author himself, as a recommendation for the actor who will embody this image on stage. He is characterized as an empty and extremely stupid person. However, in the course of the play, the image of Khlestakov opens up more fully, in all its comic diversity.

It is no coincidence that the first appearance on the stage of this image is not associated with the young man himself, but with his servant, who talks for a long time about the owner. He characterizes him - “it would be good if it was worthwhile, otherwise it’s a simple lady”, meaning obviously the most insignificant rank and the fact that the owner behaves stupidly and arrogantly out of status. They are completely characterized by the local owner of the hotel - "you and your master are scammers, and your master is a rogue." It is difficult to give a more precise description. In a dispute with the owner, not just stupidity is manifested, but an awkward childish naivety in an attempt to still make a proper impression and deceive everyone.

(Artist L. Konstantinovsky, illustration for "The Government Inspector", 1951)

It is these attempts that he succeeds with success when he communicates with local officials. For local officials, the fear of exposure of their unseemly acts in the service and innate servility close up the seemingly obvious stupidity of the visitor. And Khlestakov, as they say, has already suffered.

In dealing with the mayor and the local elite, our hero shows remarkable imagination and reckless impudence, which could be quickly exposed in ordinary society, but in this case passes for the truth. No less stupid are the ladies, and the police, and the owner of the city himself, whom the author described as "not a very stupid person."

The image of Khlestakov as the main character of the comedy

And yet, Khlestakov, with his role in the play, interacting with the rest of the characters, is the main character. The way the rest of the characters characterize him, in a positive laudatory or in a negative ironic way, reveals their own characters.

By chance, finding himself in the role of the capital's auditor, Khlestakov, not at all embarrassed, takes on this role and fulfills it in accordance with his own primitive ideas about the habits and lifestyle of high officials. However, the fact that they cannot expose him suggests that it was precisely such habits that all bureaucracy was endowed with.

(Weinstein Mark Grigorievich "Khlestakov and the Governor", 1945-1952)

They easily believe him and obsequiously try to please, especially seeing in him a bird of "high flight". An intelligent mayor, seasoned policemen, young ladies easily recognize him as a capital burner. Obviously, according to Gogol's plan, this is a hyperbole of the beau monde that he observed in real life. And the final silent scene turns out to be the apogee of comedy and is perceived by the actors themselves as only a possible repetition of everything that happened.

Even the very fact of exposure did not in any way affect the change in the consciousness of one's own mistake and stupidity of either the local bigwigs or the false auditor himself. The only annoyance on both sides is the unfortunate mistake and the fact that this official did not turn out to be exactly who he claimed to be. Only one annoyance that "will spread history around the world." And the very fact of the mistake did not turn out to be a lesson for anyone, because the mistake itself was only in the personality of the arrived veil, but not in his behavior, actions, stories and boasting. As the mayor said - “I myself am not glad that I drank, as if even half of what he said turns out to be true!” This is precisely the main meaning invested in the image of the protagonist, the author. The stupidity of officials reveals the very viciousness of the entire bureaucratic system of the state.

The most, in my opinion, comical and even a little stupid hero of Gogol's comedy "The Government Inspector" is Ivan Aleksandrovich Khlestakov.

The author says that Khlestakov looks twenty-three years old, he is thin and "without a king in his head", which the reader will be convinced of throughout the comedy. On the way from St. Petersburg to his native Saratov, Khlestakov loses all his money, so he stops in province N, where all the events of the comedy unfold.

Local officials and merchants perceive Khlestakov as the strictest auditor, they had an opinion about him even before their personal communication, this is one of the main moments of the comedy, because if people themselves invented the ruler of their destinies, then it will be very difficult to convince them, even if you behave as stupid and tactless as Khlestakov behaved.

Due to the fact that everyone perceives Ivan Alexandrovich as a judge of his future, people simply do not notice that his habits, speech and the stories that he tells about himself are at odds with reality. And even if they notice, then for them it is not a beam in the eye, but a small speck of dust. An example of this is the conversation of the Gorodnichiy, who, after Khlestakov's boasting about his position in St. Petersburg and talking on a short note with the emperor himself, says that even if half of what Khlestakov said is true, then this is already a collapse, because such a respected person saw everything the shortcomings of the city run by the Governor.

Khlestakov, being a man of not the most honest breed, takes advantage of the moment and receives the maximum benefit from the current situation. Although he does not realize that he is perceived as an auditor who can put everyone in prison, he understands that his position among these stupid residents seems very high to them, his connections in St. Petersburg are extremely powerful, so he uses the power that he has : allegedly borrows money from all officials, which he will never return, although he promises; eats as much as possible; accepts payment for himself in a hotel, where he has debts for two weeks of accommodation and food.

He listens to all the merchants' complaints about his Governor, promises to sort it out and, of course, punish the culprit. He takes money from the workers for this, listens to the problems of two women, but in the end he simply forgets everything that he heard, because it doesn’t matter to him.

He is greedy for women and tries to succeed immediately with both the Gorodnichiy's daughter and his wife. Even at such an already absurd moment, no one guesses what Khlestakov is, and when they understand, it's too late.

An essay about Khlestakov

Gogol's comedy "The Inspector General" was written a long time ago, but it is still relevant. And there are many reasons for this. The magnificent style that distinguishes each work of Nikolai Vasilyevich, subtle, almost jeweler irony, which few people will not cause a smile, topical social problems, which make us think for more than one generation of readers, and, of course, the heroes: bright, original, very recognizable. One of these characters is main character Gogol's immortal comedy "The Government Inspector", a swindler and rogue named Khlestakov. This is an impudent and self-confident young man who knows human psychology well and knows how, using human weaknesses, to achieve success in his plans.

One of the main character traits of Khlestakov is that this impudent young man believes that for some reason everyone should please him in every possible way and help him. That is why he willingly accepts bribes and gifts from those around him and happily begins to play the role of an imaginary auditor. Khlestakov loves when they pay a lot of attention to him, when they bow before him, fawn over him. He likes to feel all-powerful, although in reality he is absolutely nothing.

Khlestakov is one of those people who are used to taking everything from life. When he is mistaken for an auditor, he revels in his power and impunity, not at all thinking about the future, about where this performance of one actor will lead him. This person does not have any moral and ethical principles, he is used to living according to the principle "even grass does not grow after me." Khlestakov considers himself the king of life, and the rest - miserable, absolutely worthless people. But then life puts everything in its place, at the end of the performance, when the real auditor arrives.

In his comedy, Gogol had in mind that Khlestakov's features live in many contemporary people, and it is no coincidence that he chose the Russian folk saying "There is nothing to blame on the mirror if the face is crooked" as an epigraph to the work. By this, he wanted to tell readers that they should not be offended if they inadvertently find their features in the image of Khlestakov.

Khlestakov is just a petty official, but, nevertheless, he is sure that all the best in life should go to him. He simply does not notice other people, is indifferent to their needs and desires. Other people for him are just pawns with which he carries out his plans. Gogol also portrays Khlestakov a good psychologist: He easily gains confidence in the most different people, finds a common language with people, uses human weaknesses in order to cash in on them. Gogol portrays him as completely unprincipled and callous, deaf to the feelings and experiences of other people.

Gogol's comedy "The Inspector General" is still relevant due to the fact that in it Gogol draws very vivid types of human characters, in particular, vivid images of the impudent swindler Khlestakov and faint-hearted people who are afraid of the auditor and in every possible way curry favor with him, losing their own dignity. But the image of Khlestakov is drawn most vividly. Khlestakov is an impudent, self-confident swindler who is sure that his fraud will go unpunished and does not put the people around him in anything. There have been such people at all times, there were in the time of Gogol, and they still exist today. And they will.

Khlestakov's characterization in Gogol's comedy The Government Inspector

One of the main actors in Gogol's comedy "The Government Inspector" - Khlestakov. Gogol specifically chose such a surname for him. The root of the word is to whip, whip after someone. An inconspicuous, thin man, twenty-three years old. A petty official, a gambler, lost all his money on the way and is now sitting in a hotel in a county town, hungry. Therefore, he looks into everyone's plates. He wants to eat, but the mayor takes him for an auditor.

Likes to dream and likes to lie a little about himself. And he enjoys it. As if everyone is paying attention to him and even took him for an important general.

His lies are like the lies of a child, he himself believes in him. Gives out wishful thinking. The inhabitants of the city unwittingly help him in this - they believe all his tales. No one, including the mayor, bothered to check him and look at his documents. Everyone was waiting for the auditor, they were afraid of his check, and here the visitor does not pay money and sticks his nose everywhere. Why not an auditor? Therefore, no one paid attention to some inconsistency of facts in his speeches. Where has it been seen that the ambassadors of foreign powers played cards with the first comer. And a person who does not have any military rank was promised to be given the highest military rank of field marshal.

Khlestakov managed to deceive even the mayor, who boasts that he has been deceiving people for thirty years of his service. He did not understand who he was confused with. If I had been a little smarter, I would have benefited from the current situation. And so he just wanted to eat and borrow some money to go further. After all, he did not plan to stay in this city for a long time. He never plans anything at all, he does not live by reason, but benefits from the current situation.

Khlestakov is a man without moral principles, stupid, lazy. He prefers not to work, but to spend time at the card table. He borrows money from people, knowing in advance that he will not give them back. He deceives two women at once - the mayor's wife and daughter. The daughter is seduced by the prospect of marrying a man from the capital. He does not feel sorry for anyone and does not see except his person, a cynic and an egoist.

In the person of Khlestakov, Gogol shows that how can one be deceived in a person who only wants to appear to be what he really is not.

Essay 4

Gogol's work "The Inspector General" is an excellent example of domestic phantasmagoria and humor within the framework of literary prose and work. This work differs from the rest of his creations in that it has its own unique atmosphere and identity, again, within the framework of his work, and his vision of problems and their solutions. Also, the work is unique in its special style of narration and syllable, although these are already more technical aspects of the work. One way or another, the work is a wonderful example of Gogol's literary genius. This work is "The Inspector".

The work tells about the story of a very cunning and talented scammer Khlestakov, who, thanks to his knowledge of human psychology and his assertiveness, and partly, self-confidence, gets everything he needs. Also in the work there are many different aspects that I would like to discuss, but for now we will only discuss the image and character of the fraudster Khlestakov.

Khlestakov is essentially a person who does not care about the state of his environment, because from any situation he can always find a benefit for himself. He does not care about anything other than his safety and well-being, which is why the reader sometimes has conflicting feelings about this image. He is a hidden person, not having, at least not showing them, real friends. He only pretends that his supposedly friends are important to him, but in fact he thinks over how he can squeeze benefits out of them for himself. That's the way he is and there's nothing you can do about it. He also tries to trick as many people as possible, most likely to improve his skill.

It was the image of Khlestakov that Gogol turned out to be the most vivid and strong, which, undoubtedly, should be remembered by the reader, if only for his bitingness and self-confidence. I believe that this is what the author tried to focus on when he wrote the work, because this is what helps the reader to remember the image and keep it in his head, comprehending and scrolling through everything too, and, accordingly, return to this work again. This is my subjective opinion, and therefore, it cannot be regarded as objective.

Some interesting essays

  • Composition What does the conflict between fathers and children lead to? Grade 11

    Harmony in the family is possible only if there is no conflict between fathers and children. It would seem that people who love and are close to each other can argue about, but how often a daughter, disagreeing with her mother

  • Once the whole family we went to rest. The weather was wonderful, it was warm, and the sun shone very brightly. When we were on the bus, I kept looking out the window, afraid to miss something interesting.

  • Analysis of the story Poor People Tolstoy (works)

    In the work “Poor People”, Leo Nikolayevich Tolstoy shows that a person, even in the most difficult life situation, remains kind and has compassion for other people.

  • My favorite poem by Pushkin Winter morning composition

    There is not a single writer in Russian poetry who would not be interested in winter themes. My attitude to the poem of the great genius A. S. Pushkin "Winter Morning"

  • Review of the book Woe from Griboyedov's Wit

In his explanations for the actors, Gogol described him as follows: “A young man, about 23 years old, thin, thin; somewhat stupid and, as they say, without a king in his head ... ”Accidentally finding himself in a society of lies and exaggerated servility, Khlestakov felt quite comfortable in the Inspector General. For him, respect for ranks and lies are also a natural state, as for officials of a county town. True, his lie is special. Gogol warned: “Khlestakov does not cheat at all; he is not a liar by trade; he himself will forget that he is lying, and he himself almost believes in what he says. That is, a lie for him is not an exception, but the norm of life - he does not even notice it.

The climax of Gogol's play "The Inspector General" is the scene in which the drunken Khlestakov, having gone into a rage, talks about his life in St. Petersburg. The complete discrepancy between what Khlestakov tells about himself and what he really is, as well as the discrepancy between how he was in the county town and how the officials saw him, create a comic effect. It was he who highlighted the true face of both Khlestakov and the officials. And it turned out that in the main thing (in the ability to live a lie and in orientation to rank) they are very similar.

If the mayor sees himself in his dreams as a general who doesn’t care about anything, then Khlestakov even sees himself as a field marshal. The mayor dine "somewhere with the governor," and Khlestakov "on a friendly footing with Pushkin." Although their appearance is quite different. He is “thin” and “thin”, “a whistle”, as the deceived mayor called him, and almost all officials are fat, round. They are frozen in their habits, unwilling to change anything. He is in constant motion and ready to change depending on the situation. This is clearly seen in the first scenes of the comedy. At first, Khlestakov in the comedy "The Inspector General" is timid, fawning even before the tavern servant. But as soon as he noticed that they were afraid of him, he immediately turned into an important person even in his own eyes. And in the eyes of frightened officials, he had been in this rank even earlier.

Khlestakov deceived the mayor because ... he was not going to do this. Because he behaved cunningly, because he was ingenuous. Therefore, he got the better of a highly experienced and intelligent mayor, who was much dumber, smaller.

On superficial observation, it seems that in Gogol's comedy, the mayor and his company compete with Khlestakov in cunning, deceit, dexterity ... But in fact, there is no competition, since one of the parties - Khlestakov - simply evades the fight, not understanding neither the goals nor the intentions of their opponents. But by doing so, Khlestakov gives them the full opportunity to fight the ghost that they built in their imagination. And not only to fight, but even to be defeated by him.

The image of Khlestakov in The Government Inspector is Gogol's artistic discovery. Just like the derivative from his name - Khlestakovism. And the "prefabricated city" created by Gogol is an analogue of that big world in which everything is interconnected and mutually determined.

Gogol has all the names that speak; The surname "Khlestakov" is no exception. What does this surname hide, what does it tell readers first of all? The surname "Khlestakov" comes from the verb "lash", i.e. to be dominant, to control someone. On the other hand, the frivolity of the character is implied.
After the "billboard" comes the article "characters and costumes (a note for the gentlemen of the actors)". There our first impression is confirmed. Khlestakov is a young man, an official from St. Petersburg, somewhat stupid (without a king in his head), speaks and acts without any consideration, his speech is jerky, flies out of his mouth unexpectedly. All this is sure to be confirmed in the play - one way or another.
For the first time, Khlestakov appears before us in the second act and appearance. But even from the first act of the third phenomenon, important details about Khlestakov are learned, thanks, of course, to the two gossips themselves (Bobchinsky and Dobchinsky), and the details are as follows: an official from St. Petersburg (we already knew this), who is going to the Saratov province, behaves strangely (certifies): he lives in a tavern for another week, does not intend to leave, takes everything to the account and does not want to pay a penny. Dobchinsky and Bobchinsky, in turn, heard about this from the innkeeper Vlas. After that, both officials realized and gave Khlestakov for the Inspector to the mayor and friends in the service.
FRAGMENT FROM THE PLAY.
CITY MAN (IN FEAR). What are you, God be with you, it's not him.
DOBCHINSKY. He! and does not pay money, and does not go. Who should be if not him? ...

Monologue of Osip. It is here that we learn that Khlestakov is not the Inspector General; moreover, an official of the lower class (the registrar is a civil rank of the XIV class), poor in material terms (and not particularly rich in spirituality), plays cards, does not engage in business, i.e. does not work.

After a little time (the mayor was going, he was driving), the mayor was in the room in all its glory (in a hat scratched with a saber) (only Khlestakov was in the room). The mayor stood for a minute, and then the conversation began. Almost immediately, Khlestakov begins to complain about the conditions of detention in the local tavern, namely, not at all good quality food. The mayor makes excuses, becomes shy, even trembles, speaks to the side (characterizes the mayor as vile). In this dialogue, Khlestakov is quite brave, invigorated (this, it seems to me, is due to the fact that Khlestakov was hungry, because, in fact, he knew that he was talking with a person who was higher in rank); one more detail: Khlestakov hinted at the minister, and this, of course, could not but frighten the mayor; it is after this that the mayor gives in and begins to make excuses (although he used to justify himself, but not so ardently), complain about life, refutes the slander about the beating of a non-commissioned officer's wife ... And in the end, the mayor does not find another way out than a proposal financial assistance Khlestakov. He, of course, is happy and takes the money. Everything is like a stone from the soul (thinks the mayor). Further, the mayor dared, i.e. offered (somehow, embarrassedly) to live at home, to which Khlestakov could not refuse. After that, the mayor offers to visit charitable institutions, to which Khlestakov agrees, but the mayor, before going to charitable institutions with Khlestakov, writes a letter to his wife and daughter to prepare for the reception of the Inspector (ready to drink).

Khlestakov reappears, but already in the third act and the fifth appearance, together with a rather large company, in the mayor's house. In a conversation, we learn that Khlestakov was regaled without measure in a charitable institution, they gave him a drink, and he was glad (he was hungry). He has a desire to compose on the basis of satiety (this can be seen with an inconspicuous eye from a conversation, in particular with Anna Andreevna and Marya Antonovna). He poses in front of the ladies, claims that he is used to living in the world, talks about life in St. Petersburg, how he is there with the head of the department on one leg, how famous he is there, that everyone knows him there, how he was once confused with the commander-in-chief of the soldiers (how can He is as thin as straw. He actively talks about aspects of literature, about the creative life in this particular area: "... I am on the same footing with Pushkin ...". Issues strangers literary works for theirs. And he has a house in St. Petersburg, and a watermelon on the table for seven hundred rubles ... but I wanted to emphasize that he starts talking and this remains without the slightest attention (everyone is scared): "... How do you run up to the fourth floor ..." Yes, in In those days, lower-class officials lived on the fourth floor! The State Council is also afraid of him (hey, where enough!). Soon, at the end of a long story, Khlestakov leaves for the side.

Afterwards, the mayor’s house is crowded: Tyapkin-Lyapkin, Strawberry, the postmaster, Khlopov, Dobchinsky and Bobchinsky. The main purpose of the collection: "Who first enters the room and gives a bribe to the Inspector." The first judge on the way (according to Zemlyanika, the judge has no word, Cicero flew off his tongue - a strong argument!), And he copes perfectly. In general, it doesn’t matter further (then the postmaster, Strawberry, who never gave money, Dobchinsky and Bobchinsky). In the end, Khlestakov has more than a thousand rubles in his pocket.

Khlestakov writes a letter to Tryapichkin, so to speak, to brag about how he shod, circled all the officials around his finger, and received a lot of money, without doing anything special.

I skip the scene of "salary about everything to Khlestakov", we move on to another - a declaration of love to Marya Antonovna, Anna Andreevna, and, finally, a marriage proposal to Marya. Both ladies did not realize that Khlestakov loved strongly, for a long time - he could not, since (this can be seen) rushes from one extreme to another.

After Khlestakov leaves and says that he will arrive soon - but we know that this is nonsense.

Soon after this, a feast takes place in the mayor's house; The mayor rejoices especially, in view of the marriage of the so-called Inspector to his daughter, Marya Antonovna. The details of the feast do not interest us.

After some time, the postmaster runs in (with a printed letter) and reports that they were all deceived, and soon reads the letter. Officials learned a lot of interesting things about themselves.

THE CITY COURT IS STUPID AS A GRAY GELTING;
THE POSTMASTER IS EXACTLY THE DEPARTMENT GUARD MIKHEEV, SHOULD ALSO BE A SCALE, DRINKING BITTER;
THE OFFICER OF THE PLEASANT ESTABLISHMENTS OF THE STRAWBERRY IS THE PERFECT PIG IN YERMOLKA;
THE SUPERINTENDANT OF SCHOOLS IS ROTHER THROUGH WITH ONIONS;
JUDGE LYAPKIN-TYAPKIN IN THE STRONGEST DEGREE MOVETON.

CONCLUSION.

Khlestakov is "the most difficult character in the play." He, having become the culprit of universal deceit, did not deceive anyone. He successfully played the role of the Inspector, not only not intending to play it, but without even realizing that he was playing it. Only in the middle of the fourth act in Khlestakov's head vague guesses begin to dawn that he is being mistaken for a "state man."

But it is precisely in unintentionality that Khlestakov's "strength" ... He provoked all the cunning game of the mayor and officials not by cunning, but by sincerity.

Fear set the stage for deceit. Interestingly, Khlestakov does not have replicas "aside" - he has what is on his mind, then on his tongue.

Khlestakov is sincere in all cases. He invents with the same frankness with which he previously spoke the truth - and again the officials are deceived. This time they accept what was fiction as truth.

The image of Khlestakov is inexhaustible, fraught with stunning surprises. Khlestakov is "genius" in his exceptional lightness and "unspecified" fiction. Is this Khlestakov's deceit? But we know that he lies sincerely. Boastfulness? But he believes in what he says.
Involuntarily, you come to the conclusion that the most accurate and comprehensive definition will be made on behalf of the character himself - "Khlestakovshchina"

P.S.
The conclusion was written with the help of an article in the book by Yu.V. Mann "Poetics of Gogol".

Ivan Khlestakov is one of the main characters in Gogol's comedy. Thanks to his image, the author managed to show us life in a past era, when a person is judged in a country not by his qualities and services to the Fatherland, but by his position. Now we will try to describe in the image of Khlestakov, the main character, who became creative luck for the writer.

Khlestakov Ivan is a controversial and ambiguous hero, whose image turned out to be very successful and accurate. On the one hand, Khlestakov can hardly be called a fraudster, because he is not specifically called an auditor, but only took the opportunity. But in other way, fair man I would never have done that and would immediately have refuted the erroneous opinion. But no, because of the mistake of the highest county authorities, because of local cowardly swindlers and thieves, a vile nature was released, which immediately cleared up. And the excitement kicked in. Therefore, the hero is completely immersed in the role assigned to him. Another prudent person in his place would have benefited and immediately left, especially if they begin to suspect him of deceit, but this is not about Khlestakov, who was passionate in life and played to the last, squandering all his fortune.

How does the image of Khlestakov appear before us?

The author describes him as a petty person, an insignificant low-ranking official. This is a poor guy of twenty-four years old, who could lose even the insignificant fortune that he had. writes that this is a stupid person, without a king in his head. He wanted to try his luck in the capital, but failed. On the way home, he lost all the money and he has to live in a certain town, where they are just waiting for the arrival of the auditor. Khlestakov and took him for him. And he quickly began to play along, especially since he always wanted to be a significant person.

Khlestakov is a dreamer, a deceitful person who thinks superficially and does not think about the consequences. Having played the auditor, Ivan lies about himself, inventing unprecedented stories. In his stories, he embodies his dreams, giving them a certain reality. He does this with such conviction that even the highly experienced mayor did not see through the false auditor and believes him to the end. And Ivan himself believes in his lie.

The hero is a master of lies, who without a twinge of conscience takes money from everyone, promising to return everything. This is a person who can simultaneously take care of his daughter and her mother, and it is not known how the whole story would have ended if Khlestakov had not left before the deception was revealed.

The image of Khlestakov and the hero of comedy are the founder of Khlestakovism, which personifies frivolity, stupidity, lies, laxity, the desire to impersonate another.

The image of Khlestakov in the comedy Inspector General, 2nd option

key figure and vividly in Gogol's work, the Inspector General is the image of Khlestakov, who in himself was a worthless person, an ordinary typical little man. By chance, when he lost in the capital and was driving home, Khlestakov finds himself in a town where officials take him for an important auditor. And here his life turns into a fairy tale, which Khlestakov always dreamed of. Now he is interesting to everyone, everyone wants to see him at home, and they tremble before his person. And here the true image of Khlestakov begins to be revealed in the comedy The Inspector General, about which we are writing our essay.

The image of Khlestakov with quotes

In order to more plausibly describe the main character in an essay on the topic, we suggest referring to quotes from the work. And we meet, as the author writes, a young twenty-three-year-old man, thin, thin, slightly stupid. According to the mayor, he is so unprepossessing that he would have crushed with a fingernail. a poor nobleman who serves in St. Petersburg, holding the position of a registrar. He treats work carelessly, so he can skip it, but card games have always been mandatory.

Khlestakov is always combed, dressed stylishly, knows how to present himself, respects ranks, honors people from high society and despises people of low class.

He is a good actor, so he quickly gets used to the role of the auditor, as if he had been waiting for this all his life. False auditor, becoming important person, immediately attributed to himself talents that he never had. He boasted of his connections, had conversations, and without a twinge of conscience asked for money from officials. In the successfully invented image of Khlestakov, Gogol ridiculed the vices of officials and their obscene qualities.

Khlestakov's lifestyle

What kind of life does our Khlestakov lead? From the work of Gogol, we see a nobleman, a landowner, who lives in a modest apartment and occupies an insignificant post, earning little money. Khlestakov leads life beyond his means, travels to theaters, plays cards, takes money from his parents, and constantly dreams of a different life, which he observes from the outside. And how I would like to become a significant person, to feel constant attention from the ladies. He dreams of being mistaken for the commander-in-chief, so the incident in a small town became for Khlestakov like a fairy tale, which he dreamed of all his life, and by chance came true.

In general, Khlestakov's lifestyle is worthless, frivolous, and does not bring any benefit to society. His whole life is made up of accidents.

Khlestakov's character

While working on the essay, I would like to briefly dwell on the character of Khlestakov. This is a frivolous, irresponsible, lazy person who does not like to work. He does not seek to grow in the service, a spender, a liar, a windy playboy, who, incidentally, was an excellent actor. His only natural gift is luck, thanks to which Khlestakov managed to leave the city on time, while not forgetting to give exact characteristics in a letter to each of the officials of a small county town.

The meaning of the image of Khlestakov

Having studied the comedy The Government Inspector, we see how important the image of Khlestakov is in Gogol's work. Here Khlestakov not only personifies deceit and hypocrisy, and shows the spiritual emptiness that was characteristic of many of the author's contemporaries, but is also a tool through which the vices of officials are revealed. At the same time, the hero reveals them unconsciously. Without noticing it, he brought the officials to clean water, so the value of his image in comedy is priceless.

The meaning and relevance of the image of Khlestakov

The meaning of Khlestakov's image is quite clear. Through the image of the main character, the author wanted to ridicule the vices of society and draw the viewer's attention to the existing problems that people face. What is most interesting, the Khlestakovs can be easily found among us, so the question of whether the image of Khlestakov is relevant in our time can be answered positively. To confirm this, it is enough to remember who Khlestakov is.

He is a liar, enjoys using his parents' money, loves fashionable clothes, but at the same time does not want to work and earn money. Now take a look around. Almost all people lie for their own benefit. And how many children are around who are happy to live at the expense of their parents? A lot of them. They are accustomed to getting all the best without much work. Look around you, see how many people pretend to be someone they are not!

All this certainly emphasizes the relevance of the image of Khlestakov in our days.

The image of Khlestakov based on Gogol's comedy "The Government Inspector" - an essay

5 (100%) 2 votes