Basically, everyone wants to learn to recognize a lie. Of course, it's very cool when we see that we are being lied to. This is a useful skill and should be developed in order not to be dupes. But the question is the following, what to do with when we saw and recognized a lie by all signs? Tell our liar about it!? It is unlikely that he admits that he is lying. Therefore, we will use psychological methods that can force a person to tell the truth.

Method "Suddenness"

This method, when used correctly, can get a person to tell the truth. Its essence lies in the fact that during the conversation you should suddenly interrupt and ask a question that interests you. The conversation should be built neutrally, with as much sympathy for the interlocutor as possible in order to win him over. Thus, you force a person to relax and trust you.

Take care of counterattacks in advance, because the person will probably understand your trick and try to laugh it off or hush up the topic. Therefore, always keep at the ready, which will prompt the person to answer the question. Or ask a question of interest in the presence of other people who, like you, want to hear the truth.

Method "Blackmail"

Blackmail is not a dirty method, so feel free to use it. With the help of blackmail, you can also force a person to tell the truth. You just need to act as follows. Feel for a person, a “sore spot”, for which you can grab and demand whatever your heart desires. After that, put him before the fact that if he does not tell the truth, then an investigation will follow. If a person did not tell you the truth, then be sure to put your promises into action, perhaps this will shake his self-confidence and force him to tell the truth.

The "I Know What You're Hiding" Method

This method is often used by operatives to force a person to tell the truth. During the investigation, many clues are revealed, which, if correctly compared, can paint a picture of the incident. This picture (not all, but only a part of which you are absolutely sure) is shown to the suspect and after that the phrase is pronounced: “It will be better if you tell everything yourself!”. After this phrase, a person has a feeling of fear that everyone really knows about his actions and he begins to tell the truth.

Method of "Trust"

This method is the most pure and sincere of all, which will make a person tell the truth. Its essence lies in the fact that it should be so strong that the person feels that you can tell the reason why he lied. The main drawback of this method is that it only works among friends and loved ones. Although it is difficult to call it a disadvantage, because it is so important for us that loved ones trust us and tell the truth.

Method "Logical problem"

A simple yet complex method to understand to get a person to tell the truth. To use it, you need to understand how lies work. When a person lies, he tries to present the situation so that it looks like the truth. At this moment, a logical chain of consequences is formed in his head and he is completely focused on it. Right at this very moment, you need to cause a shocking situation in a liar, thereby breaking his logical chain. A situation that shocks the interlocutor is very easy to come up with. For example, when you notice that a person is lying, start singing and dancing loudly or ask a question of a personal nature that will make the interlocutor switch their thoughts.

Many of us have been lied to, deceived, very brazenly without any remorse. And the most important thing is that you already knew the truth, but they don't tell you it. But you really want to know the whole truth from the person who deceived you. Find out why he did it, why and how. Whether it happened by accident or on purpose. Although people are deceiving, they always take this step deliberately.

Well, to get a person to tell you the whole truth, first talk heart to heart with him. If he still does not confess, then proceed to measures of psychological coercion.

How to get someone to tell the truth

1) Most the best option, this is the one when you say that you know the whole truth, that you have already been told everything. A person begins to get scared, get lost, and he cannot quickly figure out a new excuse. He will begin to lay out the whole truth, everything he knows, everything how he deceived you. And you listen carefully and follow his facial expressions, gestures. You will immediately understand whether this person is telling the truth to you or lying again.

2) Have a casual conversation with him discuss some news, talk about business. And abruptly ask a question that interests you. The person will be confused, he will not expect that you will sharply ask such a question. He will not have time to invent new lies, he will have to tell you the whole truth. Get ready to hear everything, don't be upset. A person who cheats is never worth your feelings.

3) Meet this person and abruptly ask what you are interested in. He will not expect such frankness, he will begin to lay out to you everything that he knows, everything that he lied to. This is what you need. Surprise is the main the move of a man who waits for the truth. Immediately think of a question so that it sounds firm and clear, so that the person immediately understands what they want from him, no need to go around in circles and wait for this person to tell you everything. A person who deceives you will never tell the truth himself if he is not well-wishing to you.

4) The most desperate step - This blackmail. But use this is an extreme case, if you know something very bad about this person, then be sure to tell him this that you can use this information as you wish. But if he will tell you what you want to know, then you promise to be silent about this to a person. The argument must be valid. Otherwise, you will just laugh at yourself.

5) Use some tricks. You can get the person drunk in the course of communication in order to find out the whole truth that you want to know.

We wish you good luck so that you learn the whole truth from the person who is lying to you. Communicating with any person you have to be open and calm. Even if the information is not very pleasant, then you need to react calmly enough and think it over carefully. The main thing is not to be nervous, that person is definitely not worth it.

How to make a man tell the truth? - video

Alas, people often deceive each other. Lies can be manipulative and provocative, for the sake of words and for salvation, but the worst of all is the lie of concealment. As a rule, in order to lie, a person definitely needs a reason for this, so if you catch a person in a lie, think about why he is lying to you. It is likely that if you offer him ways to solve an existing problem, then the need for lies will disappear by itself, and you will not need to resort to methods of detecting lies.

Dream and truth

This method of revealing the truth is considered one of the most vague, since often in a dream a person can talk about what he is dreaming of, and not open the corners of his subconscious. So, how to find out the truth in a dream? The basis of this method is a conversation with a sleeping person who is prone to saying words, as well as whole phrases. It is believed that by asking leading questions, one can thus find out from a person all the ins and outs. Although this method is not scientifically sound, we will describe the main points that need to be done:

• a conversation with a sleeper should be from a few seconds to several minutes;
• it is necessary to ask monosyllabic questions that would have either “yes” or “no” in their answer;
• questions should be short;
• bodily contact with a person is necessary (hold him by the little finger);
• the volume of the voice should be muffled and rhythmic with the breathing of the sleeper.

If you didn’t get the information you need from the person, don’t worry. Below we describe the real ways to understand the truth in modern conditions of life.

Ways to Reveal the Truth

So, are there effective ways to determine the truth and find out if a person is lying to you or not? The following methods are currently known:

1. Direct impact method. Usually, these means include various methods of psychological and physical influence, which may be accompanied by torture, the use of various pharmacological agents that will suppress a person’s will, as well as the impact on a person’s subconscious through hypnosis and suggestion.
   • Reception of physical influence was widespread in the Middle Ages both in Europe and in Rus' (torture with a red-hot iron, tearing out of the nostrils, beating with sticks and whips, hammering nails under the nails, rack). The physical impact has a significant drawback: a person subjected to torture is able to subscribe to any offense, if only he was given a break, and this is no longer a search for truth, but immersion in another lie.
   • Taking pharmacological preparations is widely used in our time during interrogations (the famous "truth serum"). This technique can also include an old and tried-and-tested remedy - alcohol, but with the proviso that many drunks very often confuse reality with fiction. As a rule, pharmacological preparations are used together with psychological methods of suggestion, otherwise it is very difficult to achieve the truth.
   • Reception of psychological influence includes the use of a hypnotic session, as well as various ways suggestion. The latter include, for example, the famous method with two investigators (bad and good), which works almost flawlessly in a circle of ignorant people.
2. Method of bodily manifestation. These are the so-called non-verbal tricks of finding out how to find out the truth. The central place in this method is occupied by the well-known lie detector, which is used in their work by the internal affairs bodies. Using the method of bodily manifestation, you can only see that a person is either lying to you or not, but you will not know the truth itself. What should be paid attention to when talking with a person?
   • eyes (a person who composes on the go will raise his eyes up, narrow his eyes, strain his eyes);
   • facial expressions (a person who lies will never be able to portray sincerity - so he will get a smile only with the help of his mouth);
   • posture (deceiving people, as a rule, psychologically shrink, which is expressed in their posture - legs crossed, arms crossed, retraction of the head into the shoulders);
   • movements (if a person gesticulates strongly, and his hands involuntarily reach for the earlobe, nose, forehead, throat, neck, hair or eyes, then most likely he is lying);
   • blinking (if a person blinks more than six times a minute, then he is lying);
   • intonation (a person who shows strange intonations that are not characteristic of him, most likely composes on the go);
   • delay in speech (before answering a question, a lying person will involuntarily make a long pause).
3. Method of logical analysis. Using the deductive or inductive method, experts can determine whether the facts are true or the interlocutor is hiding the truth. Everyone is well aware of the deductive method of Sherlock Holmes, as well as other logical methods of famous detectives who use them in their work.
4. provocation method. This method is considered classic, as it forces the interlocutor to reveal all his cards in the end. By manipulating a person's consciousness and putting him in certain conditions, you can find out not only that a person is deceiving, but also hear the long-awaited truth. Among the most common methods of this method are:
   • reception of lulling vigilance;
   • reception of application of effect of surprise;
   • bluff reception;
   • reception of feigned doubt in the veracity of a person;
   • receiving a false alarm.

   The main thing in this method is to make a person worry, because being in an emotionally unstable state, he is able to reveal the truth. Skillful interrogators either play along, or show mock distrust, or get angry, or convince a person that they sincerely believe him. All these actions can confuse a person and betray the truth.

5. The method of using the personal qualities of a person. How to understand the truth in this case? This method uses the weaknesses of the interlocutor, his bright character traits, which will give out the truth as soon as the opponent splits.

WAYS TO REVEAL THE TRUTH

For thousands of years people have been forced to live next to lies and deceit. And all this time they are trying to find the truth, as they say, to separate the wheat from the chaff. You can go to the truth in different ways: through and through and roundabout ways, and there are no ready-made recipes for this for all occasions. For as many people and specific situations exist, there are as many ways to expose deception. All we can do is to sort out the typical methods for revealing the truth.

The first one is probably direct impact. It can be expressed in psychological impact or physical. In the latter case we are talking about torture as a means of finding out the truth. Often psychological and physical measures of influence are combined, sometimes pharmacological preparations are added to them, weakening the will and making a person more frank. Various types of hypnosis and suggestion in general adjoin here.

Deception detection methods based on bodily manifestation emotional reactions, the so-called non-verbal. A classic example of this group of methods is the lie detector. But it should be noted that this group of methods allows only to expose the deception, but not to find out the truth. These are precisely the "determinants of lies", but not the truth.

The third group of methods is based on logical analysis incoming information. The deductive method of the legendary Sherlock Holmes is the best illustration of the merits and limitations of such an analysis. In the future, a wide field of activity for the use of a computer will open here, but one important detail should be remembered: a person is full of emotions and this can make his behavior unpredictable.

The fourth group of methods can be conditionally designated as " provocations". This includes completely different ways of influencing the human psyche, which are united by one principle: active manipulation of consciousness. In order to find out the truth, a person must be placed in special conditions. These conditions are created on purpose, forcing the deceiver to reveal his cards. There is a lot similar to a combinative style of chess in which a piece is sacrificed in order to eventually checkmate.This includes techniques such as " lulling vigilance", "applying surprise effect", "bluff", "feigned doubt about the veracity of an opponent and other methods of revealing the truth.

Finally, the fifth group of methods reflects an individual approach to the "client" and is based on use of personal qualities of a person, his weaknesses and character traits.

Let's start illustrating the methods with direct action. A study of the history of legal proceedings shows us how many mistakes and misconceptions people had to endure along the way. The first ways to find out the truth in litigation in Rus' are described in the Russkaya Pravda, a handwritten code of laws introduced by Yaroslav the Wise and supplemented by Vladimir Monomakh. As N.I. Kostomarov writes in his "History ...", "The testimony of witnesses, the oath and, finally, the test with water and iron served as evidence at the trial."

The oath was called "rota". But although it was pronounced in church, in a solemn atmosphere, under the cross, it sometimes turned out to be false. Great importance had the testimony of "rumors" - witnesses. If there were doubts about the truth of the testimony, the so-called "God's court" was applied, which was quite cruel and did not guarantee justice. The accused was forced to pick up red-hot iron, and then, according to the nature of the burns, they judged whether he should be acquitted or accused. In Rus' in the old days there was a proverb: "You will not tell the real truth, so you will tell the ins and outs."

The original meanings of these words are largely forgotten, and now few of our contemporaries will be able to explain how the real truth differed from the inside story. It turns out that in medieval courts, torture began with sticks ( dlinnikov). The speeches made by the tortured under the sticks - under lengths, called authentic It was "the real truth". After the true truth, the tortured person was subjected to a new torture, forcing him to tell the truth. ins and outs- for this, iron nails were hammered under his fingernails. Torture has long been in use in Russian legal proceedings. Aleksey Tolstoy, who specially studied the materials of interrogations of the 16th-18th centuries, described the methods of interrogation in Rus' in the time of Peter the Great in the following way: the man came to life, and again they jerked up on their twisted hands, trying to find out the names of the main breeders ... "

It should be noted that torture and other methods of physical coercion are effective if investigators need to break a person’s will, force him to meekly obey the orders of the tormentors, but if we are talking about the search for truth, then in this regard, physical torture does not always lead to the desired result. Here is what military counterintelligence officer O. Pinta wrote on this issue: “Corporal torture has one serious drawback. Under their influence, very often an innocent person confesses to crimes that he never committed, and only in order to get a break. forced to tell anyone, but not necessarily the truth."

The persistence of a person in hiding the truth is modified under the influence of certain chemicals. Everyone has probably heard about the so-called "truth serum" - a substance that reduces volitional control, the introduction of which into a person's blood makes him more outspoken. However, many experts believe that pentazol did not live up to the expectations placed on it: firstly, they get used to it, so it may not have its effect, and, secondly, the "client" may be preliminarily subjected to a hypnosis session, so the introduction " truth serum" will only force him to give out another legend, previously "embedded" in him.

But, if few of us have dealt with pentasol, then of course, everyone has come across another drug that unties tongues - with ordinary alcohol. "What a sober man has on his mind, a drunk man has on his tongue," he says. folk proverb, and indeed - in a state of intoxication, a person becomes more frank and can blurt out his most cherished secrets.

The dislike of drunks towards sober members of their company is known. Perhaps one of its reasons is that a drunk person is sometimes too frank, which more sober drinking buddies can take advantage of. Historian V. Kostomarov cites an interesting episode on this topic, which concerns Count Peter Andreevich Tolstoy, a well-known figure of the Petrine era. He was quite a smart and cunning man. During the time of Princess Sophia and Ivan Miloslavsky, he was involved in the Streltsy rebellion and barely escaped execution, repenting of his sins to Peter in time. Subsequently, the tsar repeatedly used him for the most secret and delicate assignments - in 1717, the count deceived Tsarevich Alexei from Naples and brought him to Russia to certain death.

Somehow, in order to find out the necessary information, he decided to pretend to be drunk, but was exposed by the king. Here is how the historian tells about this case:

“Once, at a feast at the shipyard, the guests, after a spree and gratuitous, began to easily lay out to the tsar what everyone had at the bottom of their souls. Tolstoy, imperceptibly evading the glasses, sat down by the fire, dozed off, as if drunk, lowered his head and even took off his wig, meanwhile, swaying, he attentively listened to the frank chatter of the interlocutors of the king.Peter, who habitually walked up and down the room, noticed the trick of the cunning one and, pointing to him to those present, said:

Look, the head hung - as if it had not fallen off the shoulders.

Don't be afraid, your majesty," Tolstoy, who suddenly came to his senses, answered. "She is still faithful to you and is firm on me.

A! So he only pretended to be drunk, - Peter continued. - Give him three glasses of good flin (warmed beer with cognac and lemon juice). So he will catch up with us and will also crack like a magpie.

However, this method of drugging your opponent in order to find out the truth is not always perfect. After all, a drunken consciousness, clouded by alcohol vapors, does not distinguish reality from drunken fantasies, and therefore it is not at all easy to distinguish truth from lies in the words of a drunk person.

In N.V. Gogol's comedy "The Inspector General", the mayor, in order to extort more from Khlestakov, gets him drunk at dinner. But he is lying drunk with three boxes, which confuses the owner:

C o r o d n i h i y. And I'm not glad I got drunk. Well, what if half of what he said was true? (Thinks.) But how could it not be true? Walking, a person brings everything out. What is in the heart, is in the tongue. Of course, he leaned in a little. Why, without swearing, no speech is said. He plays with the ministers and travels to the palace ... "The mayor did not know what an unrestrained braggart he was dealing with. After all, Khlestakov, having drunk, himself sincerely believed in what he was talking about. And therefore, the mayor, who was adept at deceit, took everything at face value.

Whatever substance is used to "loosen the tongue" of a suspected lie, it does not in itself guarantee the revelation of the truth. "Truth serum" is useless without the use of active methods of suggestion, therefore, pharmacological and psychological methods of influence, as a rule, are used in combination. However, the use of a single hypnotic suggestion often produces good results.

The old, but tried and tested technique with two investigators - "good" and "bad" - still remains effective. As O. Pinto writes in the book "Spy Hunter", "... one of them plays the role of a rude person - he screams, threatens and knocks his fist on the table. The other, calm, handsome person, allegedly protects the suspect and does everything to calm down his rampaging colleague. The tension culminates when a "rude man" shouting insults and the most terrible threats is unexpectedly summoned somewhere. The interrogation continues with the "handsome" interrogator. He calms the suspect in a friendly tone and offers him a cigarette. An abrupt change of scene usually gives good results - the suspect confesses everything."

Now let's move on to another method of revealing the truth, which is very effective in capable hands - provocation, especially if it is applied taking into account the personality characteristics of the suspect. Tradition says that the legendary King Solomon, whose deeds are described in the Bible, was a great master of revealing the truth among the intricacies of lies. The Third Book of Kings of the Old Testament describes the court that the wise Solomon administered over two women who turned to him for justice. Each accused the other of stealing a baby. One of them claimed that her neighbor had replaced her stillborn child with her living one at night, the second woman denied all this.

Since each of the women stubbornly defended her rights to the baby, Solomon ordered the child to be cut into two parts and given to each woman in half. One of the women agreed with this cruel verdict, saying: “Let it be so - neither for me nor for her!”, while the second, after the decision of the king, refused the baby and asked to give the child to her rival - if only he would remain alive. Wise Solomon, of course, was not going to execute an innocent child - he only wanted to find out which of the two women cherishes him more, and by the cold-blooded reaction of the false mother, he revealed a lie.

Solomon was a born psychologist. He knew that under stress a person behaves differently than at rest, and that's when he tends to make mistakes. It was to this technique - to put a person in extreme conditions and watch his reactions - that Sherlock Holmes resorted to find out where Irene Adler keeps a photograph compromising the King of Bohemia.

"Holmes sat up on the sofa and began to writhe, like a man who does not have enough air. The maid rushed to open the window. At the same instant, Holmes raised his hand; at this signal, I threw a saber into the room and shouted:" Fire! my mouth, as the whole crowd took him in. Ragged men and gentlemen, grooms and maids, all yelled with one voice: “Fire!” Thick clouds of smoke swirled in the room and escaped through the open window. I saw people rushing about inside; a minute later, the voice of Holmes was heard, assuring that it was a false alarm ...

You did it cleverly, doctor, - said Holmes. - Never better. Everything is fine.

Did you get a photo?

No, but I now know where it is hidden.

How did you know?

She herself showed me, as I predicted.

I do not understand anything.

I'm not going to make a secret out of it," he said, laughing. - Everything is very simple. You probably guessed that all these onlookers on the street are my accomplices. I hired them for the evening.

Guessed.

I had some red paint in my hand. When the scuffle began, I rushed forward, fell, pressed my hand to my face and appeared in a deplorable state. Old trick.

I also understood this.

They carry me into the house. She is forced to agree - what can she do? I find myself in the living room, in the very room that I suspect. The photo is somewhere nearby, either in the living room or in the bedroom - I decided to find out. They lay me down on the couch, I pretend to be out of breath, they have to open the window, and you get to do your thing.

And what did you achieve?

A lot. When the house is on fire, instinct makes a woman save what is dearest to her. Married woman rushes to the child, the unmarried woman grabs the jewelry box. It was clear to me that for our lady there is nothing more precious than photography. She rushes to save her. The fire was well played out. There was enough smoke and screaming to make nerves of steel tremble. She did exactly what I expected. The photo is in a hiding place, behind a sliding panel, just above the bell cord. She instantly found herself there and half pulled out the photo - I even saw the edge. When I shouted that the alarm was false, she put the photograph back, glanced at the saber, and ran out of the room. I never saw her again."

Indeed, skilful provocation is a tried and tested means of revealing the truth. As long as a person is calm, collected and determined to keep a secret, it is difficult to get anything from him. But if by skillful actions or words to bring him out of balance, put him in a difficult position, force him to ill-considered response actions, the necessary information will come out by itself. The still unforgettable Baltasar Gracian wrote about this in his "Pocket Oracle". The two hundred and thirteenth point of his guide to novice intriguers is called: "Skillfully contradict."

"The best way to probe is not to get involved yourself, to unravel the other. An excellent master key that releases other people's passions from imprisonment, feigned distrust is emetic for secrets, the key to a forbidden heart. With particular subtlety, you make a double test, feelings and thoughts. Deliberate neglect in response to the mysterious you will lure the most cherished secrets from the depths and, gently leading by the bridle, you will direct them to the tongue - and there in the nets set up by your crafty intent. It was impenetrable. Feigned doubt is the best key by which curiosity will reveal everything it wants."

Another way to test a person's loyalty to yourself is to get him to act actively. This is how the Persian ruler Khosrov Parvez tested the loyalty of his vassals. When he saw in his entourage two courtiers bound by bonds of friendship and sympathy, he told one of them fictitious things about the other. Under great secrecy, he said that he decided to execute his friend on suspicion of treason. If after that the second courtier did not change his behavior in any way, then it was clear that the secret was kept. Then the courtier who was put to the test was rewarded and exalted. To close the issue with imaginary betrayal, Khosrow informed the courtier that the suspicions about his friend were not justified. If the second courtier, falsely accused by Khosrov, abruptly changed his behavior, avoided meetings with the king, behaved frightened or anxious, then it became clear that he knew about the imaginary plans of the king regarding him. In this case, the courtier who could not stand the test was disgraced and forced to go into exile.

A. Ignatenko, from whose book "How to Live and Rule" this example is taken, writes that "to check the close associates, Khosrow used women from his own harem. duties and forgetting about loyalty to the king, then he was subjected to a shameful punishment.

In order to obtain information about a certain person, it is possible to involve a third party - the only task is how to provoke this "third" person to provide information of interest. In the anecdote below, the "key" to revealing the truth is a strong emotional arousal combined with a deliberately false accusation:

An American and a Russian are talking about married life.

When I leave, - an American shares his experience, - I leave a tape recorder and a video camera turned on in the bedroom. And when I arrive, I find out if my wife cheated on me in my absence.

And when I return from a business trip, - says the Russian, - I just go to a neighbor and ask her: "Why are you cheating on your husband, bitch?" She replied: "I'm cheating? What then to say about your wife?" And for a long, long time he tells me who, when and how much my wife has ...

Above, we analyzed the biblical story with the judgment of Solomon. It turned out that the Jewish king had imitators, and no less talented ones. Revealing the truth by arousing in man his negative qualities not without success, the old rabbi used in the story of V. Veresaev, which is called "The Judgment of Solomon." I present it in abbreviation.

Until recently, patriarchal Jewish shtetls still existed in the western region, where the rabbi was not only an intermediary between people and God for the local population, but was also a judge and a general adviser. In all disputes and quarrels, the pious Jew resorted to his court.

Two Jewish women who lived in the same house quarreled: they were drying clothes in the attic, one of them lost several pieces, she blamed the neighbor for the loss, she in response began to blame her. Scream, clamor, no one could make out anything. The women went to the rabbi.

The old rabbi listened attentively to both of them and said:

Go and bring your own linen here.

The women brought The rabbi announced:

Let it lie with me until the morning, and come in the morning, and we will try to figure out what's the matter.

In the morning women came, and many other Jews also came - everyone was interested to see how the rabbi would judge this tricky case. The rabbi said:

Rosa Solomonovna! Rebekah Moiseevna! I know you both as respectable women and pious Jews. It can't be that any of you went to theft. But maybe one of you distractedly took a couple of pieces of the neighbor's underwear from the rope. Go through again, each one, here, in front of our eyes, your pile and see if someone else's underwear accidentally got into it.

Rosa Solomonovna proudly and confidently began sorting her heap. She took out the sheet - suddenly turned pale, then blushed and lowered her head low.

It's... It's not mine, she said shamefacedly.

That's how! Not yours? exclaimed Rebekah Moiseevna triumphantly. “And what a scandal you made, how you dishonored honest people!

Red with excitement and shame, Roza Solomonovna still put aside the towel, the man's shirt, and said in a drooping voice:

It's not mine either.

Also not yours? Rabbi, you see for yourself now.

The rabbi impassively interrupted the second woman.

Go through your pile now and see if you have someone else's linen.

Please. Only I vouch in advance: you will not find someone else's linen with me. I'm not one of those, I don't need someone else's, but it would burn my hands. Well, of course! Here. Nothing is alien. All is mine.

Is everything yours?

Only my.

The judge turned to the first woman, who was sadly waiting for a shameful condemnation, and ordered:

Go through your neighbor's pile and choose your underwear from it.

Everyone was in amazement. The first woman selected a few pieces from the pile and happily said:

Here is mine. And it's mine.

Take. It really is yours.

The second woman yelled indignantly:

How - her?! Let...

But the judge strictly said:

Into each heap I put a few pieces of my own linen at night. Rosa Solomonovna was not even afraid of condemnation and honestly admitted that the linen was not hers. And you, Revekka Moiseevna, if you declared my underwear as yours, then it would be even easier to declare Rosa Solomonovna's underwear as yours.

Conclusion:

To reveal the truth, make the person worry. What he hides in a calm state, he can give out, being in the power of emotions. Somewhere play along with him a little, somewhere a little angry, in one place show mock distrust, in another - pretend that you are sure of his sincerity. Adrenaline is a bad adviser to the mind...

People often lie for many reasons, some manage to reach incredible heights in the skill of lying. Sometimes it is very difficult to reveal a lie, but you still have to bring him to clean water.

1. Use words and manners to deceive the person from whom you want to hear the truth. Say that you know everything, and you want to offer him to act together.
2. Or say that the truth means nothing to you, and it is not so important, it is likely that the interlocutor will shake something up, trying to impress you or just brag.
3. You can look for evidence that will help bring the accomplice to clean water. Thus, you will not leave the slightest chance for a lie.
4. For a question that you want to find an answer, listen to the explanation, looking into the eyes of the interlocutor. It is quite difficult to lie like that when he looks straight into the eyes, not looking up or briefly looking for where to provoke the eye - this is the first hint that he is lying.
5. Try talking to friends and acquaintances of the interlocutor in order to understand his intentions, why he lies all the time, what is the reason for this behavior. But you need to remember that this situation can turn against you if his acquaintances remain on his side.
6. To find out the truth from an adult, you can give him alcohol to drink and find out the secret. But such a situation can also turn against you if a person remembers everything and understands that you did it for selfish purposes.
7. To find out about a small thing, you can accuse a person of committing a worse deed, thus, a liar will give out all the information, fearing punishment from a false accusation.
8. You can pretend that you heard a person talking in a dream, voicing the information that you think should bring a person to clean water. This will not cause any difficulty, especially if this is your relative.
9. Remain calm, only such a state will help to expose the liar. When communicating with a person, be open and respond to information calmly, stabilizing the situation.
10. Use forbidden tricks, blackmail or threat, this should be done when all methods have been tried and they have not given the desired result. Fear can provoke a liar to tell the truth.

Attention: when communicating with a person who tells a lie, try to ask questions all the time, confusing him with your own conversations. Very soon the truth will be revealed, and you will be able to have the information you need.

Reception of surprise- ask questions to the question that interests you unexpectedly, with a smile on your face, gently and naturally. This approach is highly likely to provide you with a truthful answer.

Blackmail reception- a dirty method, but quite effective, seeking the truth from a child - you need to promise him a ban on computer games, a husband - fasting nights, a wife - the absence of a mink coat, a friend - refusing to communicate with him, etc.

kind welcome- he denies scolding, obscene expressions, you need to pull yourself together and talk calmly, trying to expose the liar. Perhaps the opponent will see you as a friend and understand that it is useless to lie in such a situation.

Acceptance of emergencies- an extreme oddity, if at the moment of talking about a subject of interest something more reckless comes up, then the logical chain of a liar will begin to collapse. Moreover, the more extreme the strangeness, the more honest the answer.

Reception of a logical discrepancy- a simple and at the same time difficult method to understand. It turns out that when a person lies, a whole chain of events is formed in his mind, which can collapse from your single tactless question, for example, how is your personal life or what is there at school.

As they say, there would be a desire, but you can bring a person to clean water. The main thing is why it is for you. If it’s not so important, then don’t get involved in this dirty business, because sooner or later the lie will be revealed, and everything will fall into place. That's just who wants to communicate with a pathological liar.

There are people who want to embellish life all the time, they themselves believe in this lie, and they are supported by those who are also capable of such blasphemy. Anything can be expected from such individuals, and therefore it is better to keep a distance from them.

Children's lies need to be stopped, especially when it comes to the educational process, unwillingness to perform certain tasks, because the consequences can be the saddest - poor grades, poor progress, lack of motivation.

Here are some tips to help you live in the truth and never tell anyone anything but the truth. Lies have always been and will be punished! Why check it out for yourself!

Live truthfully, enjoy life, enjoy everything beautiful in the world, and those people who cannot live without lies, let them look for other people with whom they will be interested and exciting, giving birth to new false stories about their lives!